The article "The Gap Between Wine Expert Ratings and Consumer Preferences"
(Intl. J. of Wine Business Res., 2008: 335-351) studied differences between
expert and consumer ratings by considering medal ratings for wines, which
could be gold \((G)\), silver (S), or bronze (B). Three categories were then
established: 1. Rating is the same \([(\mathrm{G}, \mathrm{G}),(\mathrm{B},
\mathrm{B}),(\mathrm{S}, \mathrm{S})]\); 2. Rating differs by one medal
\([(\mathrm{G}, \mathrm{S}),(\mathrm{S}, \mathrm{G}),(\mathrm{S},
\mathrm{B}),(\mathrm{B}, \mathrm{S})]\); and 3. Rating differs by two medals
\([(G, B),(B, G)]\). The observed frequencies for these three categories were
69,102 , and 45 , respectively. On the hypothesis of equally likely expert
ratings and consumer ratings being assigned completely by chance, each of the
nine medal pairs has probability \(1 / 9\). Carry out an appropriate chi-squared
test using a significance level of 10 by first obtaining \(P\)-value
information.