/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Mist (airborne droplets or aeros... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Mist (airborne droplets or aerosols) is generated when metal-removing fluids are used in machining operations to cool and lubricate the tool and workpiece. Mist generation is a concern to OSHA, which has recently lowered substantially the workplace standard. The article "Variables Affecting Mist Generaton from Metal Removal Fluids" (Lubrication Engr., 2002: 10-17) gave the accompanying data on \(x=\) fluid-flow velocity for a \(5 \%\) soluble oil \((\mathrm{cm} / \mathrm{sec})\) and \(y=\) the extent of mist droplets having diameters smaller than \(10 \mu \mathrm{m}\left(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) : $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccc} x & 89 & 177 & 189 & 354 & 362 & 442 & 965 \\ \hline y & .40 & .60 & .48 & .66 & .61 & .69 & .99 \end{array} $$ a. The investigators performed a simple linear regression analysis to relate the two variables. Does a scatter plot of the data support this strategy? b. What proportion of observed variation in mist can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between velocity and mist? c. The investigators were particularly interested in the impact on mist of increasing velocity from 100 to 1000 (a factor of 10 corresponding to the difference between the smallest and largest \(x\) values in the sample). When \(x\) increases in this way, is there substantial evidence that the true average increase in \(y\) is less than .6? d. Estimate the true average change in mist associated with a \(1 \mathrm{~cm} / \mathrm{sec}\) increase in velocity, and do so in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A scatter plot supports linear regression; \(R^2\) shows the proportion of variation explained; the impact for \(x\) from 100 to 1000 is likely less than 0.6; estimate the slope for change per unit velocity with a confidence interval.

Step by step solution

01

Construct a Scatter Plot

Plot the given data points with the fluid-flow velocity \(x\) values on the horizontal axis and the mist extent \(y\) values on the vertical axis. Each pair \((x_i, y_i)\) represents a point on this scatter plot.
02

Analyze Data Trend

Inspect the scatter plot for a linear trend by visually examining how well the data points can be approximated by a straight line. This will help determine if a simple linear regression model is appropriate.
03

Determine Proportion of Variation

Calculate the coefficient of determination \(R^2\) from the regression analysis output. \(R^2\) represents the proportion of variation in \(y\) that is explained by the linear relationship with \(x\). Obtain \(R^2\) from regression software or statistical tools.
04

Evaluate Increasing Velocity Impact

Using the regression model, calculate the predicted increase in mist \(y\) when velocity \(x\) increases from 100 to 1000 cm/s. Compute the confidence interval for the predicted increase and assess if it includes the value 0.6 mg/m³. This will show if there is substantial evidence of an increase less than 0.6 mg/m³.
05

Estimate Change per Unit Increase

Using the estimated slope \(b_1\) from the regression analysis, estimate the average change in mist \(y\) for a 1 cm/s increase in velocity \(x\). Calculate the standard error of the slope and use it to form a confidence interval for this estimate to assess precision and reliability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot
A scatter plot is a valuable tool in visualizing the relationship between two continuous variables. In this context, the two variables are fluid-flow velocity and mist extent. The data points are plotted on a graph, where the fluid-flow velocity values serve as the x-values and the extent of mist droplets form the y-values. Each data pair represents a unique point on the graph.

Let's consider the plot of this particular study. By looking at the distribution of points, we can attempt to determine if there is a linear relationship. If the points in the scatter plot seem to fall along a straight line, it suggests that a linear regression model might be appropriate for the data.

This examination is crucial, as it visually suggests whether further statistical analysis will yield meaningful insights. If points are highly scattered, it might indicate that a simple linear model may not be the best approach. However, if a clear pattern emerges, as hypothesized in this study, it justifies proceeding with regression analysis to mathematically quantify the relationship.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \(R^2\), is a key summary statistic in regressional analysis. It quantifies how much of the observed variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable.

In a linear regression model, \(R^2\) values range from 0 to 1. A higher \(R^2\) value indicates a better fit, meaning more of the variance of the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable. For instance, an \(R^2\) of 0.80 suggests that 80% of the variation in mist extent can be attributed to changes in fluid-flow velocity.

Calculating \(R^2\) helps in determining the efficacy of the regression model. In the context of this exercise, we rely on statistical software to compute \(R^2\) effectively. A high \(R^2\) would support the initial hypothesis that the velocity of the fluid flow has a significant impact on mist generation, validating the use of a linear regression model.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing. It indicates whether the results of an analysis are likely to occur by chance or reflect a true effect in the population. After performing regression analysis, we can assess the significance of our results through p-values associated with the model coefficients.

The p-value tells us about the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, which typically claims no relationship exists between the variables. A p-value lower than a chosen significance level (such as 0.05) suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis and thus, supporting the validity of our alternative hypothesis.

In this case, the investigators want to determine if an increase in fluid velocity leads to a substantive change in mist generation, specifically less than 0.6 mg/m³. By constructing confidence intervals around our regression estimates and examining the p-value, we can get a clearer picture of the statistical significance, providing insights into whether the observed trend in data holds for the wider population.
Regression Model
A regression model, specifically a linear regression model in this context, is used to predict the value of a dependent variable based on the value of an independent variable. Linear regression models are depicted as equations of a line: \(y = b_0 + b_1x\), where \(b_0\) is the y-intercept and \(b_1\) is the slope of the line.

In practical terms, the slope \(b_1\) represents the average change in the dependent variable (mist generation) for every one-unit increase in the independent variable (fluid-flow velocity). Calculating this slope helps in understanding the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables.

Using a linear regression model involves estimating these coefficients from the data and checking assumptions such as linearity, homoscedasticity, and normality of residuals. In this study, once the model is built, it is used to predict how mist generation changes as velocity scales, thereby providing a practical tool for anticipating and mitigating workplace mist hazards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The efficiency ratio for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{ft}^{2}\) ). The article "Statistical Process Control of a Phosphate Coating Line" (Wire J. Intl., May 1997: 78-81) gave the accompanying data on tank temperature \((x)\) and efficiency ratio \((y)\). $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrrr} \text { Temp. } & 170 & 172 & 173 & 174 & 174 & 175 & 176 \\ \text { Ratio } & .84 & 1.31 & 1.42 & 1.03 & 1.07 & 1.08 & 1.04 \\ \text { Temp. } & 177 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 180 & 181 \\ \text { Ratio } & 1.80 & 1.45 & 1.60 & 1.61 & 2.13 & 2.15 & .84 \\ \text { Temp. } & 181 & 182 & 182 & 182 & 182 & 184 & 184 \\ \text { Ratio } & 1.43 & .90 & 1.81 & 1.94 & 2.68 & 1.49 & 2.52 \\ \text { Temp. } & 185 & 186 & 188 & & & & \\ \text { Ratio } & 3.00 & 1.87 & 3.08 & & & & \end{array} $$ a. Construct stem-and-leaf displays of both temperature and efficiency ratio, and comment on interesting features. b. Is the value of efficiency ratio completely and uniquely determined by tank temperature? Explain your reasoning. c. Construct a scatter plot of the data. Does it appear that efficiency ratio could be very well predicted by the value of temperature? Explain your reasoning.

The decline of water supplies in certain areas of the United States has created the need for increased understanding of relationships between economic factors such as crop yield and hydrologic and soil factors. The article "Variability of Soil Water Properties and Crop Yield in a Sloped Watershed" (Water 91Ó°ÊÓ Bull., 1988: 281-288) gives data on grain sorghum yield \((y\), in \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}\)-row \()\) and distance upslope \((x\), in \(\mathrm{m})\) on a sloping watershed. Selected observations are given in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 0 & 10 & 20 & 30 & 45 & 50 & 70 \\ \hline y & 500 & 590 & 410 & 470 & 450 & 480 & 510 \\ x & 80 & 100 & 120 & 140 & 160 & 170 & 190 \\ \hline y & 450 & 360 & 400 & 300 & 410 & 280 & 350 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot. Does the simple linear regression model appear to be plausible? b. Carry out a test of model utility. c. Estimate true average yield when distance upslope is 75 by giving an interval of plausible values.

The article "Photocharge Effects in Dye Sensitized \(\mathrm{Ag}[\mathrm{Br}, \mathrm{I}]\) Emulsions at Millisecond Range Exposures" (Photographic Sci. and Engr., 1981: 138-144) gives the accompanying data on \(x=\%\) light absorption at \(5800 \mathrm{~A}\) and \(y=\) peak photovoltage. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} x & 4.0 & 8.7 & 12.7 & 19.1 & 21.4 \\ \hline y & .12 & .28 & .55 & .68 & .85 \\ x & 24.6 & 28.9 & 29.8 & 30.5 & \\ \hline y & 1.02 & 1.15 & 1.34 & 1.29 & \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot of this data. What does it suggest? b. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is appropriate, obtain the equation of the estimated regression line. c. What proportion of the observed variation in peak photovoltage can be explained by the model relationship? d. Predict peak photovoltage when \% absorption is 19.1, and compute the value of the corresponding residual. e. The article's authors claim that there is a useful linear relationship between \% absorption and peak photovoltage. Do you agree? Carry out a formal test. f. Give an estimate of the change in expected peak photovoltage associated with a \(1 \%\) increase in light absorption. Your estimate should convey information about the precision of estimation. g. Repeat part (f) for the expected value of peak photovoltage when \% light absorption is 20 .

The following data is representative of that reported in the article "An Experimental Correlation of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Power Boilers Based on Field Data" (J. of Engr: for Power; July 1973: 165-170), with \(x=\) burner-area liberation rate \(\left(\mathrm{MBtu} / \mathrm{hr}^{-\mathrm{ft}^{2}}\right)\) and \(y=\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate (ppm): $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 100 & 125 & 125 & 150 & 150 & 200 & 200 \\ \hline y & 150 & 140 & 180 & 210 & 190 & 320 & 280 \\ x & 250 & 250 & 300 & 300 & 350 & 400 & 400 \\ \hline y & 400 & 430 & 440 & 390 & 600 & 610 & 670 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid, obtain the least squares estimate of the true regression line. b. What is the estimate of expected \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate when burner area liberation rate equals 225 ? c. Estimate the amount by which you expect \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate to change when burner area liberation rate is decreased by 50 . d. Would you use the estimated regression line to predict emission rate for a liberation rate of 500 ? Why or why not?

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" (J. of the Air and Water Mgmnt. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (yr) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emissions \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{kWh})\) : $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.