/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Fire load \(\left(\mathrm{MJ} / ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Fire load \(\left(\mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\) is the heat energy that could be released per square meter of floor area by combustion of contents and the structure itself. The article "Fire Loads in Office Buildings" ( \(J\). of Structural Engr., 1997: 365-368) gave the following cumulative percentages (read from a graph) for fire loads in a sample of 388 rooms: \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Value } & 0 & 150 & 300 & 450 & 600 \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 0 & 19.3 & 37.6 & 62.7 & 77.5 \\ \text { Value } & 750 & 900 & 1050 & 1200 & 1350 \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 87.2 & 93.8 & 95.7 & 98.6 & 99.1 \\ \text { Value } & 1500 & 1650 & 1800 & 1950 & \\ \text { Cumulative \% } & 99.5 & 99.6 & 99.8 & 100.0 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a relative frequency histogram and comment on interesting features. b. What proportion of fire loads are less than 600 ? At least \(1200 ?\) c. What proportion of the loads are between 600 and 1200 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Skew to the right; b. 77.5% less than 600, 1.4% at least 1200; c. 21.1% between 600 and 1200.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Relative Frequencies

To construct a relative frequency histogram, first calculate the relative frequencies for each interval. We do this by subtracting the cumulative percentage of an interval from that of the preceding interval. For the range 0-150: \[ \text{Relative Frequency} = 19.3\% - 0\% = 19.3\% \]For the range 150-300: \[ \text{Relative Frequency} = 37.6\% - 19.3\% = 18.3\% \]For the range 300-450: \[ \text{Relative Frequency} = 62.7\% - 37.6\% = 25.1\% \]Continue in a similar manner for the rest of the intervals.
02

Construct the Histogram

Use the relative frequencies calculated to draw a histogram. On the x-axis, plot the fire load values (intervals like 0-150, 150-300, etc.). On the y-axis, plot the relative frequency percentages. Each bar's height corresponds to the relative frequency percentage of that interval. For instance, the first bar (0-150) would have a height of 19.3%.
03

Analyze Histogram Features

The histogram from the previous step visually illustrates the distribution of fire loads. Look for patterns such as skewness, peaks, or gaps. Observably, most frequencies (the majority of the data) are concentrated in lower fire load ranges, indicating a skew to the right.
04

Proportion less than 600

To find the proportion of fire loads less than 600, use the cumulative percentage for the value 600 from the table: The cumulative percentage is 77.5%. Thus, the proportion is 77.5% or 0.775 in decimal form.
05

Proportion at least 1200

To find the proportion of fire loads that are at least 1200, subtract the cumulative percentage for value 1200 from 100%: \[ 100\% - 98.6\% = 1.4\% \]Therefore, the proportion is 1.4% or 0.014 in decimal form.
06

Proportion between 600 and 1200

To find the proportion between 600 and 1200, subtract the cumulative percentage for 600 from that for 1200: \[ 98.6\% - 77.5\% = 21.1\% \]Thus, the proportion is 21.1% or 0.211 in decimal form.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative percentage is a way to express the total percentage of data points that lie below a certain value in a dataset. It adds up, or cumulates, the percentage of each interval to determine how many data points fall within a specific range.
In the fire load example, we have cumulative percentages listed for various fire load values:
  • For a fire load value of 0, the cumulative percentage is 0%, which implies no rooms have a fire load less than 0.
  • For 150 MJ/m², it's 19.3%, indicating that 19.3% of the rooms have fire loads of 150 MJ/m² or less.
  • At 1200 MJ/m², the cumulative percentage is 98.6%, meaning almost all rooms (98.6%) have fire loads up to this level.
The cumulative percentage helps visualize how the data accumulates, giving us an intuitive way to understand how many units are below a certain threshold. It's particularly useful when assessing relative positions of data in statistics.
Data Distribution
Data distribution represents how the data values are spread or dispersed across different ranges. A relative frequency histogram is often used to provide a visual representation of this distribution.
In the context of our exercise, the histogram reveals how commonly different fire load levels occur within the rooms studied.
  • The x-axis of the histogram represents the fire load ranges (e.g., 0-150 MJ/m², 150-300 MJ/m²).
  • The y-axis shows the relative frequency, essentially the cumulative percentages converted to individual percentages for each interval.
  • For instance, the 0-150 MJ/m² range, with a relative frequency of 19.3%, means that this value accounts for 19.3% of all data points.
A visual scan of the histogram reveals key traits of the data—like skewness or central tendency. In this case, most of the data aggregates toward lower fire load levels, illustrating a right skew (or positive skew). Such insights are crucial for knowing not only the range of values present but also the prevalence of each within the dataset.
Proportion Calculation
Proportion calculation in statistics helps determine the fraction of the dataset falling within specific intervals. It converts percentages into proportions, making the data easier to interpret mathematically.
For example, consider determining the proportion of fire loads less than a specific value. If the cumulative percentage for 600 MJ/m² is 77.5%, converting this to a proportion means:
\[\text{Proportion} = \frac{77.5}{100} = 0.775\]
This indicates 77.5% of rooms have a fire load less than 600 MJ/m². Similarly, for calculating the proportion of loads at least 1200 MJ/m²:
\[\text{Proportion} = 100\% - 98.6\% = 1.4\% = 0.014\]
This means 1.4% of the rooms have a fire load of at least 1200 MJ/m².
Finally, to find the proportion of loads between 600 and 1200 MJ/m²:
\[21.1\% = 0.211\]
Understanding these proportions allows us to make informed conclusions about how fire loads are distributed across rooms in the study. It's a fundamental step for interpreting real-world data and applying it to corresponding decision-making processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The value of Young's modulus (GPa) was determined for cast plates consisting of certain intermetallic substrates, resulting in the following sample observations ("Strength and Modulus of a Molybdenum-Coated Ti-25Al-10Nb-3U1Mo Intermetallic," J. of Materials Engr and Performance, 1997: 46-50): \(\begin{array}{lllll}116.4 & 115.9 & 114.6 & 115.2 & 115.8\end{array}\) a. Calculate \(\bar{x}\) and the deviations from the mean. b. Use the deviations calculated in part (a) to obtain the sample variance and the sample standard deviation. c. Calculate \(s^{2}\) by using the computational formula for the numerator \(S_{x x}\) d. Subtract 100 from each observation to obtain a sample of transformed values. Now calculate the sample variance of these transformed values, and compare it to \(s^{2}\) for the original data.

A sample of 20 glass bottles of a particular type was selected, and the internal pressure strength of each bottle was determined. Consider the following partial sample information: \(\begin{array}{lrrr}\text { median }=202.2 & \text { lower fourth }=196.0 & \\\ \begin{array}{l}\text { upper fourth }=216.8\end{array} & & & \\ & & & \\\ \text { Three smallest observations } & 125.8 & 188.1 & 193.7 \\ \text { Three largest observations } & 221.3 & 230.5 & 250.2\end{array}\) a. Are there any outliers in the sample? Any extreme outliers? b. Construct a boxplot that shows outliers, and comment on any interesting features.

Consider a sample \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) and suppose that the values of \(\bar{x}, s^{2}\), and \(s\) have been calculated. a. Let \(y_{i}=x_{i}-\bar{x}\) for \(i=1, \ldots, n\). How do the values of for the \(x_{i}\) 's? Explain. b. Let \(z_{i}=\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right) / s\) for \(i=1, \ldots, n\). What are the values of the sample variance and sample standard deviation for the \(z_{i} \mathrm{~s}\) ?

Lengths of bus routes for any particular transit system will typically vary from one route to another. The article "Planning of City Bus Routes" \((J\). of the Institution of Engineers, 1995: 211-215) gives the following information on lengths \((\mathrm{km})\) for one particular system: \(\begin{array}{lccccc}\text { Length } & 6-<8 & 8-<10 & 10-<12 & 12-<14 & 14-<16 \\ \text { Frequency } & 6 & 23 & 30 & 35 & 32 \\ \text { Length } & 16-<18 & 18-<20 & 20-<22 & 22-<24 & 24-<26 \\ \text { Frequency } & 48 & 42 & 40 & 28 & 27 \\ \text { Length } & 26-<28 & 28-<30 & 30-<35 & 35-<40 & 40-<45 \\\ \text { Frequency } & 26 & 14 & 27 & 11 & 2\end{array}\) a. Draw a histogram corresponding to these frequencies. b. What proportion of these route lengths are less than 20 ? What proportion of these routes have lengths of at least 30 ? c. Roughly what is the value of the \(90^{\text {th }}\) percentile of the route length distribution? d. Roughly what is the median route length?

Many universities and colleges have instituted supplemental instruction (SI) programs, in which a student facilitator meets regularly with a small group of students enrolled in the course to promote discussion of course material and enhance subject mastery. Suppose that students in a large statistics course (what else?) are randomly divided into a control group that will not participate in SI and a treatment group that will participate. At the end of the term, each student's total score in the course is determined. a. Are the scores from the SI group a sample from an existing population? If so, what is it? If not, what is the relevant conceptual population? b. What do you think is the advantage of randomly dividing the students into the two groups rather than letting each student choose which group to join? c. Why didn't the investigators put all students in the treatment group? Note: The article "Supplemental Instruction: An Effective Component of Student Affairs Programming" (J. of College Student Devel., 1997: 577-586) discusses the analysis of data from several SI programs.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.