/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9.1-13SE Suppose that \({X_1},.....,{X_n}... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that \({X_1},.....,{X_n}\)form a random sample from the \({\chi ^2}\) distribution with unknown degrees of freedom\(\theta \)\((\theta = 1,2,...)\), and it is desired to test the following hypotheses at a given level of significance\({\alpha _0}\left( {0 < {\alpha _0} < 1} \right)\):

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\;\;\;\theta \le 8,\\{H_1}:\;\;\;\theta \ge 9.\end{array}\)

Show that there exists a UMP test, and the test specifies rejecting \({H_0}\)if \(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {log} {X_i} \ge k\) for some appropriate constant\(k\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Proved and showing that the family has an MLR property in\(_{i = 1}^n\log {X_i}\)

Step by step solution

01

To Show that the UMP testat \({\alpha _0}\left( {0 < {\alpha _0} < 1} \right)\)specifies rejecting\({H_0}\)if\(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {log} {X_i} \ge k\)

Take\({\theta _1} > {\theta _2}\). Then the likelihood ratio takes the value

\(\frac{{f\left( {{\bf{x}}\mid {\theta _1}} \right)}}{{f\left( {{\bf{x}}\mid {\theta _2}} \right)}} = {\left| {\frac{{{2^{\frac{{{\theta _2}}}{2}}}\Gamma \frac{{{\theta _2}}}{2}}}{{{2^{\frac{{{\theta _1}}}{2}}}\Gamma \frac{{{\theta _1}}}{2}}}} \right|^n}\)\({_{i = 1}^n}{x_i}^{\frac{{{\theta _1} - {\theta _2}}}{2}}\)

Which is an increasing function of\(_{i = 1}^n{X_i}\), or equivalently of\(T = _{i = 1}^n\log {X_i}\).

Thus the chi squared family has an MLR property in\(T\). Hence we reject the null for large values of\(T\), where the cutoff for being large is determined by the level condition. Thus, \(\exists k\)depending on level \({\alpha _0}\) such that we reject the null when\(T \ge k\).

Follows by showing that the family has an MLR property in\(_{i = 1}^n\log {X_i}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that \({X_1},....,{X_{10}}\)form a random sample from a normal distribution for which both the mean and the variance are unknown. Construct a statistic that does not depend on any unknown parameters and has the \(F\)distribution with three and five degrees of freedom.

Suppose that a sequence of Bernoulli trials is to be carried out with an unknown probabilityθof success on each trial, and the following hypotheses are to be tested:

H0 : θ = 0.1

H1 : θ = 0.2

Let X denote the number of trials required to obtain success, and suppose that H0 is to be rejected if X≤ 5. Determine the probabilities of errors of type I and type II.

Suppose that the 12 observations \({X_1},....,{X_{12}}\)form a random sample from the normal distribution with unknown mean \(\mu \)and unknown variance\({\sigma ^2}\). Describe how to carry out a \(t\)test of the following hypotheses at the level of significance\({\alpha _0} = 0.005\):

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\;\;\;\mu \ge 3 \\{H_1}:\;\;\;\mu < 3\end{array}\)

1. Consider again the situation described in Exercise 11 of Sec. 9.6. Test the null hypothesis that the variance of the fusion time for subjects who saw a picture of the object is no smaller than the variance for subjects who did see a picture. The alternative hypothesis is that the variance for subjects who saw a picture is smaller than the variance for subjects who did not see a picture. Use a level of significance of 0.05.

An unethical experimenter desires to test the following hypotheses:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}{\bf{:}}}&{{\bf{\theta = }}{{\bf{\theta }}_{\bf{0}}}}\\{{{\bf{H}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{:}}}&{{\bf{\theta }} \ne {{\bf{\theta }}_{\bf{0}}}}\end{array}\)

She draws a random sample \({{\bf{X}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{, \ldots ,}}{{\bf{X}}_{\bf{n}}}\) from a distribution with the p.d.f. \(f(x\mid \theta )\), and carries out a test of size \(\alpha \). If this test does not reject \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\), she discards the sample, draws a new independent random sample of \(n\)observations, and repeats the test based on the new sample. She continues drawing new independent samples in this way until she obtains a sample for which \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\) is rejected.

a. What is the overall size of this testing procedure?

b. If \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\) is true, what is the expected number of samples that the experimenter will have to draw until she rejects \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.