/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 Show that the matrix inverse met... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that the matrix inverse method cannot be used to solve each system. $$\begin{aligned} x-2 y+3 z &=4 \\ 2 x-4 y+6 z &=8 \\ 3 x-6 y+9 z &=14 \end{aligned}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Matrix inverse method cannot be used because the determinant of matrix A is zero.

Step by step solution

01

Write the system in matrix form

Express the given system of equations \[ \begin{aligned} x-2y+3z &= 4 \ 2x-4y+6z &= 8 \ 3x-6y+9z &= 14 \end{aligned} \] as \(AX = B\), where \[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -2 & 3 \ 2 & -4 & 6 \ 3 & -6 & 9 \end{pmatrix}, \ \ X = \begin{pmatrix} x \ y \ z \end{pmatrix}, \ \ B = \begin{pmatrix} 4 \ 8 \ 14 \end{pmatrix} \]
02

Determine if the matrix is invertible

To use the matrix inverse method, check if matrix \(A\) is invertible by calculating its determinant. The matrix \(A\) is: \[ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -2 & 3 \ 2 & -4 & 6 \ 3 & -6 & 9 \end{pmatrix} \] Compute the determinant of \(A\): \[ \text{det}(A) = \begin{vmatrix} 1 & -2 & 3 \ 2 & -4 & 6 \ 3 & -6 & 9 \end{vmatrix} = 1 \times (-4 \times 9 - 6 \times -6) - (-2) \times (2 \times 9 - 6 \times 3) + 3 \times (2 \times -6 - (-4) \times 3) \] \[ \text{det}(A) = 1 \times ( -36 + 36) - (-2) \times (18 - 18) + 3 \times (-12 + 12) \] \[ \text{det}(A) = 0 \]
03

Conclude non-invertibility

Since \( \text{det}(A) = 0 \), matrix \(A\) is not invertible. Therefore, the matrix inverse method cannot be used to solve the given system of equations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Matrix Form of Equations
To solve a system of linear equations using matrices, the first step is to write the system in matrix form. This allows us to use matrix algebra to find solutions efficiently.

Given the system:
\[ x - 2y + 3z = 4 \ \ 2x - 4y + 6z = 8 \ \ 3x - 6y + 9z = 14 \]
We can represent it in matrix form as \(AX = B\). Here, matrix \(A\) contains the coefficients of the variables, matrix \(X\) contains the variables, and matrix \(B\) contains the constants on the right-hand side:

\[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -2 & 3 \ 2 & -4 & 6 \ 3 & -6 & 9 \ \end{pmatrix}, \ \ X = \begin{pmatrix} x \ y \ z \ \end{pmatrix}, \ \ B = \begin{pmatrix} 4 \ 8 \ 14 \ \end{pmatrix} \]

This compact form simplifies the analysis of the system and is essential for applying matrix operations like finding inverses or solving using methods such as Gaussian elimination.
Determinant Calculation
The determinant is a special number that can be calculated from a square matrix. It provides insight into the properties of the matrix, such as whether the matrix is invertible (i.e., it has an inverse).

For the given matrix \(A\):
\[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -2 & 3 \ 2 & -4 & 6 \ 3 & -6 & 9 \ \end{pmatrix} \]
The determinant of a 3x3 matrix \(A\) is calculated as:
\[ \text{det}(A) = 1 \times (-4 \times 9 - 6 \times -6) - (-2) \times (2 \times 9 - 6 \times 3) + 3 \times (2 \times -6 - (-4) \times 3) \]
Expanding this:
\[ \text{det}(A) = 1 \times ( -36 + 36) - (-2) \times (18 - 18) + 3 \times (-12 + 12) \]
The result simplifies to 0:
\[ \text{det}(A) = 0 \]
This calculation shows that the determinant of matrix \(A\) is zero, which brings us to the next important concept.
Invertibility of Matrices
A matrix is considered invertible if there exists another matrix that, when multiplied with it, yields the identity matrix. The identity matrix is like the number 1 in matrix algebra: multiplying any matrix by the identity matrix leaves the original matrix unchanged.

For a matrix \(A\) to be invertible, its determinant must be non-zero. From our example, the matrix \(A\) has a determinant of zero:
\[ \text{det}(A) = 0 \]
This means matrix \(A\) is not invertible.
  • A matrix with a zero determinant is known as a singular matrix.
  • Singular matrices do not have inverses, meaning we cannot use the matrix inverse method to solve the system of equations.

Therefore, since matrix \(A\) in our system is not invertible, the matrix inverse method cannot be used for solving the system of equations. Instead, other methods like Gaussian elimination or analyzing the system for dependencies might be necessary to find solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the following system, \(D=-43, D_{x}=-43, D_{y}=0,\) and \(D_{z}=43 .\) What is the solution set of the system? $$ \begin{aligned} x+3 y-6 z &=7 \\ 2 x-y+z &=1 \\ x+2 y+2 z &=-1 \end{aligned} $$

Write a system of inequalities for each problem, and then graph the region of feasible solutions of the system. Vitamin Requirements Jane Lukas was given the following advice. She should supplement her daily diet with at least 6000 USP units of vitamin \(A,\) at least \(195 \mathrm{mg}\) of vitamin \(\mathrm{C},\) and at least \(600 \mathrm{USP}\) units of vitamin D. She finds that Mason's Pharmacy carries Brand \(\mathrm{X}\) and Brand \(\mathrm{Y}\) vitamins. Each Brand X pill contains 3000 USP units of \(A, 45\) mg of \(C,\) and 75 USP units of \(\mathbf{D},\) while the Brand \(\mathbf{Y}\) pills contain 1000 USP units of \(A, 50\) mg of \(C,\) and 200 USP units of D. PICTURE CANT COPY

Solve each problem. Several years ago, mathematical ecologists created a model to analyze population dynamics of the endangered northern spotted owl in the Pacific Northwest. The ecologists divided the female owl population into three categories: juvenile (up to \(1 \text { yr old }),\) subadult \((1\) to 2 yr old ) and adult (over 2 yr old). They concluded that the change in the makeup of the northern spotted owl population in successive years could be described by the following matrix equation. $$ \left[\begin{array}{c} j_{n+1} \\ s_{n+1} \\ a_{n+1} \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{rrr} 0 & 0 & 0.33 \\ 0.18 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0.71 & 0.94 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c} j_{n} \\ s_{n} \\ a_{n} \end{array}\right] $$ The numbers in the column matrices give the numbers of females in the three age groups after \(n\) years and \(n+1\) years. Multiplying the matrices yields the following. \(j_{n+1}=0.33 a_{n}\) Each year 33 juvenile females are born for each 100 adult females. \(s_{n+1}=0.18 j_{n}\) Each year 18\% of the juvenile females survive to become subadults. \(a_{n+1}=0.71 s_{n}+0.94 a_{n} \quad\) Each year \(71 \%\) of the subadults survive to become adults, and \(94 \%\) of the adults survive. (a) Suppose there are currently 3000 female northern spotted owls made up of 690 juveniles, 210 subadults, and 2100 adults. Use the matrix equation on the preceding page to determine the total number of female owls for each of the next 5 yr. (b) Using advanced techniques from linear algebra, we can show that in the long run, $$ \left[\begin{array}{c} j_{n+1} \\ s_{n+1} \\ a_{n+1} \end{array}\right] \approx 0.98359\left[\begin{array}{c} j_{n} \\ s_{n} \\ a_{n} \end{array}\right] $$ What can we conclude about the long-term fate of the northern spotted owl? (c) In the model, the main impediment to the survival of the northern spotted owl is the number 0.18 in the second row of the 3 \(\times 3\) matrix. This number is low for two reasons. The first year of life is precarious for most animals living in the wild. In addition, juvenile owls must eventually leave the nest and establish their own territory. If much of the forest near their original home has been cleared, then they are vulnerable to predators while searching for a new home. Suppose that, thanks to better forest management, the number 0.18 can be increased to \(0.3 .\) Rework part (a) under this new assumption.

Solve each system for \(x\) and y using Cramer's rule. Assume a and b are nonzero constants. $$\begin{array}{l} b x+y=a^{2} \\ a x+y=b^{2} \end{array}$$

Investment Decisions Jane Hooker invests \(40,000\) received as an inheritance in three parts. With one part she buys mutual funds that offer a return of \(2 \%\) per year. The second part, which amounts to twice the first, is used to buy government bonds paying \(2.5 \%\) per year. She puts the rest of the money into a savings account that pays \(1.25 \%\) annual interest. During the first year, the total interest is \(\$ 825 .\) How much did she invest at each rate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.