/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 Explain how to find the partial ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain how to find the partial fraction decomposition of a rational expression with a prime quadratic factor in the denominator.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The prime quadratic is verified in the denominator of the rational expression, and the general formula for partial fraction decomposition is applied, mostly in the form \(A/(x-B) + (Cx+D)/(x^2+1)\). The equation derived is solved for the constants. Then, the results are checked by substituting the values of the constants back into the decomposed fraction.

Step by step solution

01

Identify and Verify Prime Quadratic Factor.

First, the expression should be studied to recognize the quadratic factor that cannot be factored further in the denominator. As it is a prime quadratic factor, it will have no factors other than itself and 1. An example of a rational expression with a prime quadratic factor in the denominator could be \( \frac{2x+1}{x^2+1} \). Here, \( x^2+1 \) is the prime quadratic factor as it cannot be simplified further.
02

Apply Formula for Partial Fraction Decomposition.

Once the prime quadratic factor in the denominator is identified, it can be factored out and the formula for the partial fraction decomposition can be used. Since it is a prime quadratic factor, we will have a linear term in the numerator of the decomposed fraction and the prime quadratic factor in its denominator. It would be essentially written out as \( \frac{A}{x-B} + \frac{Cx+D}{x^2+1} \), where \( A, B, C, D \) are constants that need to be figured out.
03

Solve for constants.

Next, combine the two fractions on the right side and equate it to the original fraction. This would give an equation that equates the original expression and the decomposed expression. Now, the constants can be isolated and their values can be determined. To derive the constants, the equation derived can be equated by equating the coefficients on both sides or simply finding the roots (if possible).
04

Recheck the Decomposition.

After finding the constants, substitute them back into the decomposed fraction to check the accuracy. It is a validation step to ensure the correctness of the decomposition achieved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rational Expressions
Rational expressions are fractions wherein both the numerator and the denominator are polynomials. Just like fractions in basic arithmetic, rational expressions can be simplified, added, subtracted, multiplied, and divided. An important aspect of working with rational expressions is to find an equivalent expression that is easier to work with or to understand. This is where partial fraction decomposition comes into play.

Partial fraction decomposition is a process used to break down complex rational expressions into simpler ones, especially when the denominator contains multiple factors. This procedure facilitates the integration, differentiation, or simplification of algebraic expressions and is essential in calculus and higher algebra.
Prime Quadratic Factor
A prime quadratic factor refers to a quadratic polynomial that cannot be broken down into simpler linear factors. In other words, it's irreducible over the field of real numbers. The expression \( x^2+1 \) exemplifies a prime quadratic as it lacks real roots, and therefore it cannot be factored into real linear terms. When faced with a prime quadratic factor in the denominator of a rational expression, the partial fraction decomposition will include a term with the prime quadratic in the denominator and a linear expression in the numerator.
Denominator Factoring
Factoring the denominator is a crucial step in partial fraction decomposition. It involves breaking down a polynomial into a product of its factors, which can be primes or higher-order polynomials. In many cases, factoring reveals repetitive or distinct linear factors that help to form the basis of the partial fraction decomposition setup.

For instance, a polynomial like \( x^3 - x^2 - x + 1 \) might factor into \( (x - 1)(x^2 + 1) \), containing both a linear factor \( x - 1 \) and a prime quadratic factor \( x^2 + 1 \) in its decomposition. It's important to remember that for proper partial fraction decomposition, the degree of the numerator should always be less than the degree of the denominator. If it's not, polynomial long division must be used first to rewrite the expression accordingly.
Solving for Constants
In partial fraction decomposition, solving for constants such as \( A, B, C, \) and \( D \), is where the algebra comes into play. Once you’ve established the form of the decomposition, the original rational expression equates to the sum of its partial fractions. By finding a common denominator and equating the numerators of both sides, you create an equation concerning your constants.

By matching coefficients or substituting convenient values for \( x \) to cancel out terms, we can solve for these unknowns. For example, if we set \( x \) to zero or any other value that simplifies the equation, this allows us to isolate and solve for one constant at a time. Once all constants are determined, they can be plugged back into the decomposed form to verify the solution.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A system for tracking ships indicates that a ship lies on a path described by \(2 y^{2}-x^{2}=1 .\) The process is repeated and the ship is found to lie on a path described by \(2 x^{2}-y^{2}=1 .\) If it is known that the ship is located in the first quadrant of the coordinate system, determine its exact location.

Graphing utilities can be used to shade regions in the rectangular coordinate system, thereby graphing an inequality in two variables. Read the section of the user's manual for your graphing utility that describes how to shade a region. Then use your graphing utility to graph the inequalities. $$y \geq \frac{1}{2} x^{2}-2$$

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I graphed a nonlinear system that modeled the orbits of Earth and Mars, and the graphs indicated the system had a solution with a real ordered pair.

Harsh, mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses account for more than half the population in U.S. federal prisons. The bar graph shows the number of inmates in federal prisons, in thousands, for drug offenses and all other crimes in 1998 and \(2010 .\) (Other crimes include murder, robbery, fraud, burglary, weapons offenses, immigration offenses, racketeering, and perjury.) (GRAPH CAN'T COPY) a. In \(1998,\) there were 60 thousand inmates in federal prisons for drug offenses. For the period shown by the graph, this number increased by approximately 2.8 thousand inmates per year. Write a function that models the number of inmates, \(y,\) in thousands, for drug offenses \(x\) years after 1998. b. In \(1998,\) there were 44 thousand inmates in federal prisons for all crimes other than drug offenses. For the period shown by the graph, this number increased by approximately 3.8 thousand inmates per year. Write a function that models the number of inmates, \(y,\) in thousands, for all crimes other than drug offenses \(x\) years after 1998 . c. Use the models from parts (a) and (b) to determine in which year the number of federal inmates for drug offenses was the same as the number of federal inmates for all other crimes. How many inmates were there for drug offenses and for all other crimes in that year?

Explain how to graph the solution set of a system of inequalities.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.