Chapter 0: Problem 8
Factor out the greatest common factor. $$x(2 x+1)+4(2 x+1)$$
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 0: Problem 8
Factor out the greatest common factor. $$x(2 x+1)+4(2 x+1)$$
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Use the strategy for solving word problems, modeling the verbal conditions of the problem with a linear inequality. To earn an A in a course, you must have a final average of at least \(90 \% .\) On the first four examinations, you have grades of \(86 \%, 88 \%, 92 \%,\) and \(84 \% .\) If the final examination counts as two grades, what must you get on the final to earn an A in the course?
Describe ways in which solving a linear inequality is similar to solving a linear equation.
Your local electronics store is having an end-of-the-year sale. The price on a plasma television had been reduced by \(30 \%\) Now the sale price is reduced by another \(30 \% .\) If \(x\) is the television's original price, the sale price can be modeled by $$(x-0.3 x)-0.3(x-0.3 x)$$ a. Factor out \((x-0.3 x)\) from each term. Then simplify the resulting expression. b. Use the simplified expression from part (a) to answer these questions. With a \(30 \%\) reduction followed by a \(30 \%\) reduction, is the television selling at \(40 \%\) of its original price? If not, at what percentage of the original price is it selling?
Determine whether each statement is true or false. If the statement is false, make the necessary change(s) to produce a true statement. What's wrong with this argument? Suppose \(x\) and \(y\) represent two real numbers, where \(x>y .\) $$\begin{aligned}2 &>1 \\\2(y-x) &>1(y-x) \\\2 y-2 x &>y-x \\\y-2 x &>-x \\\y &>x\end{aligned}$$ This is a true statement. Multiply both sides by \(y-x\) Use the distributive property. Subtract \(y\) from both sides. Add \(2 x\) to both sides. The final inequality, \(y>x,\) is impossible because we were initially given \(x>y\)
Describe how to solve an absolute value inequality involving the symbol \(>.\) Give an example.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.