/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 39 (a) Use a graphing utility to es... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) Use a graphing utility to estimate the root(s) of the equation to the nearest one-tenth (as in Example 6). (b) Solve the given equation algebraically by first rewriting it in logarithmic form. Give two forms for each answer: an exact expression and a calculator approximation rounded to three decimal places. Check to see that each result is consistent with the graphical estimate obtained in part (a). $$e^{1-4 t}=12.405$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The root is approximately \( t \approx -0.380 \), consistent with the graphical estimate.

Step by step solution

01

Graphical Estimation using a Graphing Utility

To estimate the root(s) of the equation \( e^{1-4t} = 12.405 \), you can use a graphing utility like Desmos or a graphing calculator. Graph the functions \( y = e^{1-4t} \) and \( y = 12.405 \). The x-coordinate of the intersection point of these two graphs gives the estimated root of the equation. From this, we can visually estimate that \( t \) should be around -0.3.
02

Rewriting the Equation in Logarithmic Form

To solve the equation algebraically, start by rewriting the equation \( e^{1-4t} = 12.405 \) into logarithmic form. Begin by taking the natural logarithm of both sides:\[\ln(e^{1-4t}) = \ln(12.405)\]Using the property of logarithms \( \ln(a^b) = b \ln(a) \), we simplify the equation to:\[1-4t = \ln(12.405)\] Thus, \(1-4t = 2.518 \).
03

Solving for t

Next, solve for \( t \) by isolating it on one side of the equation:\[4t = 1 - \ln(12.405) \t = \frac{1 - 2.518}{4} = -0.3795\]The exact expression for \( t \) is \( t = \frac{1 - \ln(12.405)}{4} \), and the approximate rounded solution to three decimal places is \( t \approx -0.380 \).
04

Checking Consistency with Graphical Estimate

Compare the algebraic solution \( t \approx -0.380 \) with the graphical estimation from Step 1, where \( t \) was approximately \(-0.3\). The solutions are close, confirming both the graphical estimation and algebraic manipulation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

graphical estimation
Graphical estimation is a powerful technique that allows us to get a rough idea of where the solution to an equation might lie. When we want to solve an equation like \( e^{1-4t} = 12.405 \), starting by using a graphing utility can be really helpful. Here’s how it works:
  • First, you graph the left side of the equation, \( y = e^{1-4t} \), to create one curve.
  • Then, graph the right side, \( y = 12.405 \), as a horizontal line.
The point where these two graphs intersect gives you the solution to the equation. Visually estimating the x-coordinate of this intersection lets you see where \( t \) might be. In this case, a graphing utility would show that the root is approximately at \( t \approx -0.3 \). This graphical approach provides a quick check before diving into algebraic solutions.
natural logarithm
The natural logarithm, denoted as \( \ln \), is a logarithm with base \( e \), where \( e \approx 2.718 \), a unique number known as Euler's number. When solving an equation like \( e^{1-4t} = 12.405 \), natural logarithms become essential. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides helps simplify exponential equations:\[\ln(e^{1-4t}) = \ln(12.405)\]Using the logarithmic identity \( \ln(a^b) = b \ln(a) \), it simplifies to \( 1-4t = \ln(12.405) \). This operation transforms the problem into a linearly solvable format by reducing the complexity of dealing with exponents. Recognizing how natural logarithms work is crucial because they strip away the exponential nature of an equation, making algebraic methods accessible.
exact expression
Finding the exact expression for a variable involves algebraic manipulation to express it in terms of known quantities. Once we have the equation \( 1 - 4t = \ln(12.405) \), we can solve for \( t \) as follows:
  • Rearrange the equation to isolate \( t \): \( 4t = 1 - \ln(12.405) \).
  • Divide through by 4 to solve for \( t \): \( t = \frac{1 - \ln(12.405)}{4} \).
This expression is exact because it retains the precise values from the logarithmic form without rounding. It demonstrates the accuracy of algebraic strategies, allowing for detailed insight into the problem-solving process. Exact expressions are pivotal in scenarios requiring precision, ensuring that approximations or round-offs do not interfere with the results.
calculator approximation
Calculator approximation involves evaluating complex expressions to a fixed number of decimal places for practical usage. After deriving the exact expression for \( t \), namely, \( t = \frac{1 - \ln(12.405)}{4} \), we use a calculator to acquire a numerical answer. Calculating \( \ln(12.405) \) approximately as 2.518 and substituting back gives:\[t \approx \frac{1 - 2.518}{4} \]Performing the arithmetic leads to \( t \approx -0.3795 \).Rounded to three decimal places, this becomes \( t \approx -0.380 \). It's important to check that this approximation aligns closely with the graphical estimate obtained earlier, which it does. Calculator approximations are vital in real-world applications where exact values are unnecessary or impractical, facilitating quick analyses and decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1969 the United States National Academy of Sciences issued a report entitled 91Ó°ÊÓ and Man. One conclusion in the report is that a world population of 10 billion "is close to (if not above) the maximum that an intensively managed world might hope to support with some degree of comfort and individual choice." (The figure "10 billion" is sometimes referred to as the carrying capacity of the Earth.) (a) When the report was issued in \(1969,\) the world population was about 3.6 billion, with a relative growth rate of \(2 \%\) per year. Assuming continued exponential growth at this rate, estimate the year in which the Earth's carrying capacity of 10 billion might be reached. (b) Repeat the calculations in part (a) using the following more recent data: In 2000 the world population was about 6.0 billion, with a relative growth rate of \(1.4 \%\) per year. How does your answer compare with that in part (a)?

This exercise demonstrates the very slow growth of the natural logarithm function \(y=\ln x .\) We consider the following question: How large must \(x\) be before the graph of \(y=\ln x\) reaches a height of \(10 ?\) (a) Graph the function \(y=\ln x\) using a viewing rectangle that extends from 0 to 10 in the \(x\) -direction and 0 to 12 in the \(y\) -direction. Note how slowly the graph rises. Use the graphing utility to estimate the height of the curve (the \(y\) -coordinate) when \(x=10\) (b) since we are trying to see when the graph of \(y=\ln x\) reaches a height of 10 , add the horizontal line \(y=10\) to your picture. Next, adjust the viewing rectangle so that \(x\) extends from 0 to \(100 .\) Now use the graphing utility to estimate the height of the curve when \(x=100 .\) [As both the picture and the \(y\) -coordinate indicate, we're still not even halfway to \(10 .\) Go on to part (c).] (c) Change the vicwing rectangle so that \(x\) extends to \(1000,\) then estimate the \(y\) -coordinate corresponding to \(x=1000 .\) (You'll find that the height of the curve is almost \(7 .\) We're getting closer.) (d) Repeat part (c) with \(x\) extending to \(10,000 .\) (You'll find that the height of the curve is over \(9 .\) We're almost there. \()\) (e) The last step: Change the viewing rectangle so that \(x\) extends to \(100,000,\) then use the graphing utility to estimate the \(x\) -value for which \(\ln x=10 .\) As a check on your estimate, rewrite the equation \(\ln x=10\) in exponential form, and evaluate the expression that you obtain for \(x\)

Exercises \(55-60\) introduce a model for population growth that takes into account limitations on food and the environment. This is the logistic growth model, named and studied by the nineteenth century Belgian mathematician and sociologist Pierre Verhulst. (The word "logistic" has Latin and Greek origins meaning "calculation" and "skilled in calculation," respectively. However, that is not why Verhulst named the curve as he did. See Exercise 56 for more about this.) In the logistic model that we "I study, the initial population growth resembles exponential growth. But then, at some point owing perhaps to food or space limitations, the growth slows down and eventually levels off, and the population approaches an equilibrium level. The basic equation that we'll use for logis- tic growth is where \(\mathcal{N}\) is the population at time \(t, P\) is the equilibrium population (or the upper limit for population), and a and b are positive constants. $$\mathcal{N}=\frac{P}{1+a e^{-b t}}$$ The following figure shows the graph of the logistic function \(\mathcal{N}(t)=4 /\left(1+8 e^{-t}\right) .\) Note that in this equation the equilibrium population \(P\) is 4 and that this corresponds to the asymptote \(\mathcal{N}=4\) in the graph. (a) Use the graph and your calculator to complete the following table. For the values that you read from the graph, estimate to the nearest \(0.25 .\) For the calculator values, round to three decimal places. (b) As indicated in the graph, the line \(\mathcal{N}=4\) appears to be an asymptote for the curve. Confirm this empirically by computing \(\mathcal{N}(10), \mathcal{N}(15),\) and \(\mathcal{N}(20) .\) Round each answer to eight decimal places. (c) Use the graph to estimate, to the nearest integer, the value of \(t\) for which \(\mathcal{N}(t)=3\) (d) Find the exact value of \(t\) for which \(\mathcal{N}(t)=3 .\) Evaluate the answer using a calculator, and check that it is consistent with the result in part (c). TABLE AND GRAPH CANT COPY

The age of some rocks can be estimated by measuring the ratio of the amounts of certain chemical elements within the rock. The method known as the rubidium-strontium method will be discussed here. This method has been used in dating the moon rocks brought back on the Apollo missions. Rubidium-87 is a radioactive substance with a half-life of \(4.7 \times 10^{10}\) years. Rubidium- 87 decays into the substance strontium- \(87,\) which is stable (nonradioactive). We are going to derive the following formula for the age of a rock: $$T=\frac{\ln \left[\left(\mathcal{N}_{s} / \mathcal{N}_{r}\right)+1\right]}{-k}$$ where \(T\) is the age of the rock, \(k\) is the decay constant for rubidium-87, \(\mathcal{N}_{s}\) is the number of atoms of strontium-87 now present in the rock, and \(\mathcal{N},\) is the number of atoms of rubidium-87 now present in the rock. (a) Assume that initially, when the rock was formed, there were \(\mathcal{N}_{0}\) atoms of rubidium-87 and none of strontium-87. Then, as time goes by, some of the rubidium atoms decay into strontium atoms, but the to tal number of atoms must still be \(\mathcal{N}_{0} .\) Thus, after \(T\) years, we have \(\mathcal{N}_{0}=\mathcal{N}_{r}+\mathcal{N}_{s}\) or, equivalently, $$ \mathcal{N}_{s}=\mathcal{N}_{0}-\mathcal{N}_{r}$$However, according to the law of exponential decay for the rubidium-87, we must have \(\mathcal{N}_{r}=\mathcal{N}_{0} e^{k T} .\) Solve this equation for \(\mathcal{N}_{0}\) and then use the result to eliminate \(\mathcal{N}_{0}\) from equation \((1) .\) Show that the result can be written $$\mathcal{N}_{s}=\mathcal{N}_{r} e^{-k T}-\mathcal{N}_{r}$$ (b) Solve equation (2) for \(T\) to obtain the formula given at the beginning of this exercise.

A sound level of \(\beta=120 \mathrm{db}\) is at the threshold of pain. (Some loud rock concerts reach this level.) The sound intensity that corresponds to \(\beta=120 \mathrm{db}\) is \(1 \mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). Use this information and the equation \(\beta=10 \log _{10}\left(I / I_{0}\right)\) to determine \(I_{0}\), the intensity of a barely audible sound at the threshold of hearing. What is the decibel level, \(\beta\), of a barely audible sound?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.