/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Underage drinking, Part II. We l... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Underage drinking, Part II. We learned in Exercise 4.17 that about \(70 \%\) of \(18-20\) year olds consumed alcoholic beverages in any given year. We now consider a random sample of fifty \(18-20\) year olds. (a) How many people would you expect to have consumed alcoholic beverages? And with what standard deviation? (b) Would you be surprised if there were 45 or more people who have consumed alcoholic beverages? (c) What is the probability that 45 or more people in this sample have consumed alcoholic beverages? How does this probability relate to your answer to part (b)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
We expect 35 individuals with a std dev of 3.24. 45 or more would be surprising, with probability <0.2%.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Expected Value

Given that the probability of an \(18-20\) year old consuming alcoholic beverages is \(70\%\) or \(0.7\), and there is a sample of \(50\) individuals, the expected number \(E(x)\) is calculated as follows:\[ E(x) = n \times p = 50 \times 0.7 = 35 \]So, we expect 35 individuals to have consumed alcoholic beverages.
02

Compute Standard Deviation

The formula for the standard deviation of a binomial distribution is given by \( \sigma = \sqrt{n \times p \times (1-p)} \).Substitute the values:\[ \sigma = \sqrt{50 \times 0.7 \times 0.3} = \sqrt{10.5} \approx 3.24 \]Thus, the standard deviation is approximately \(3.24\).
03

Evaluate the Surprising Outcome

To determine if having 45 or more people who consumed alcohol is surprising, consider how many standard deviations away this is from the mean. The mean is \(35\), and if we compare 45 to the mean:\[ Z = \frac{45 - 35}{3.24} = \frac{10}{3.24} \approx 3.09 \]A Z-score of \(3.09\) is quite high, usually indicating an outcome in the tail of the distribution, suggesting it might be surprising.
04

Calculate Probability for 45 or More

We need to find the probability of \( X \geq 45 \) for a binomial distribution with \( n = 50 \) and \( p = 0.7 \). This is typically done using a normal approximation, or by calculating binomial probabilities, as normal distribution tables and Z-scores are often used.The normal approximation step:For a normal approximation, convert binomial to normal using \(\mu = 35\) and \(\sigma = 3.24\).Calculate the Z-score for 44.5 (continuity correction):\[ Z = \frac{44.5 - 35}{3.24} \approx 2.93 \]Using the standard normal distribution tables, the probability of a Z-score greater than 2.93 is very small (typically less than 0.002). This indicates a probability of \( X \geq 45 \) being very low.
05

Interpret and Relate to Part (b)

The probability of 45 or more individuals consuming alcohol is very low (less than 0.2\%). Based on typical levels for statistical significance (e.g., \(5\%\)), this would be considered surprising or unusual, which is consistent with the outcome from part (b).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Value
When dealing with a binomial distribution, the expected value represents what you predict to happen on average over many trials. For example, in our problem, we're considering young adults consuming alcohol. With a total of 50 young people and a probability of 0.7 (or 70%) that any one of them drinks, we can calculate the expected number of drinkers. The expected value, denoted as \( E(x) \), is found using the formula \( n \times p \), where \( n \) is the number of trials, and \( p \) is the probability. In our example, this results in \( 50 \times 0.7 = 35 \). So, under these conditions, the typical expectation is that about 35 young adults in this sample consume alcohol.
Standard Deviation
The standard deviation in a binomial distribution helps us understand how much the number of successes (e.g., people drinking) might deviate from the expected value. A smaller standard deviation suggests the outcomes tend to be closer to the expected value, while a larger standard deviation indicates more spread or variability. For our sample of 50 people, with each having a 0.7 chance of drinking, the standard deviation \( \sigma \) is calculated using the formula \( \sqrt{n \times p \times (1-p)} \). Substituting in the values, we find \( \sqrt{50 \times 0.7 \times 0.3} = \sqrt{10.5} \approx 3.24 \). This means on average, the number of drinkers will deviate from the expected 35 by about 3.24 individuals.
Probability
Probability is the measure of how likely an event is to occur. In a binomial distribution, it allows us to calculate the likelihood of a certain number of outcomes happening. When trying to determine if 45 or more young people might drink, you would want to calculate the probability of this event. Generally, you would sum the probabilities of all scenarios involving 45 or more drinkers. However, with a large number like 50 trials, this is often done using approximations such as the normal distribution, which simplifies calculations. The specific probability of some exact figures can be very small when they're far from the expected value, indicating unlikely events.
Z-score
A Z-score is a statistical measure that indicates how many standard deviations an element is from the mean in a distribution. For example, if we want to know whether having 45 drinkers is unusual, we calculate the Z-score: \( Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} \). Here, \( X \) is the observed outcome (45 drinkers), \( \mu \) is the mean (35), and \( \sigma \) is the standard deviation (3.24). Thus, \( Z = \frac{45 - 35}{3.24} \approx 3.09 \). A Z-score of 3.09 is high, as it suggests 45 is far from the mean. In the context of a normal distribution, this result would be uncommon, reinforcing our intuition that 45 out of 50 is indeed a surprising amount.
Normal Approximation
The normal approximation is a method used to simplify calculations in large sample binomial distributions using the normal distribution. When dealing with a high number of trials, such as 50, direct probability calculations can be cumbersome. By approximating the binomial distribution with a normal distribution that has the same mean and standard deviation, we can use Z-scores and normal distribution tables for calculations. For instance, when checking 45 or more drinkers, we convert 44.5 (due to continuity correction) to a Z-score and find the probability for greater values. With \( Z \approx 2.93 \), we determine this probability is small (below 0.2%). This approach simplifies complex calculations, providing a reasonable estimate in analyzing such scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

CAPM. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is a financial model that assumes returns on a portfolio are normally distributed. Suppose a portfolio has an average annual return of \(14.7 \%\) (i.e. an average gain of \(14.7 \%\) ) with a standard deviation of \(33 \%\). A return of \(0 \%\) means the value of the portfolio doesn't change, a negative return means that the portfolio loses money, and a positive return means that the portfolio gains money. (a) What percent of years does this portfolio lose money, i.e. have a return less than \(0 \% ?\) (b) What is the cutoff for the highest \(15 \%\) of annual returns with this portfolio?

Is it Bernoulli? Determine if each trial can be considered an independent Bernoulli trial for the following situations. (a) Cards dealt in a hand of poker. (b) Outcome of each roll of a die.

Arachnophobia. A Gallup Poll found that \(7 \%\) of teenagers (ages 13 to 17 ) suffer from arachnophobia and are extremely afraid of spiders. At a summer camp there are 10 teenagers sleeping in each tent. Assume that these 10 teenagers are independent of each other. \({ }^{33}\) (a) Calculate the probability that at least one of them suffers from arachnophobia. (b) Calculate the probability that exactly 2 of them suffer from arachnophobia. (c) Calculate the probability that at most 1 of them suffers from arachnophobia. (d) If the camp counselor wants to make sure no more than 1 teenager in each tent is afraid of spiders, does it seem reasonable for him to randomly assign teenagers to tents?

Area under the curve, Part I. What percent of a standard normal distribution \(N(\mu=0, \sigma=1)\) is found in each region? Be sure to draw a graph. (a) \(Z<-1.35\) (b) \(Z>1.48\) (c) \(-0.42\)

GRE scores, Part I. Sophia who took the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scored 160 on the Verbal Reasoning section and 157 on the Quantitative Reasoning section. The mean score for Verbal Reasoning section for all test takers was 151 with a standard deviation of \(7,\) and the mean score for the Quantitative Reasoning was 153 with a standard deviation of 7.67 . Suppose that both distributions are nearly normal. (a) Write down the short-hand for these two normal distributions. (b) What is Sophia's Z-score on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? Draw a standard normal distribution curve and mark these two Z-scores. (c) What do these Z-scores tell you? (d) Relative to others, which section did she do better on? (e) Find her percentile scores for the two exams. (f) What percent of the test takers did better than her on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? (g) Explain why simply comparing raw scores from the two sections could lead to an incorrect conclusion as to which section a student did better on. (h) If the distributions of the scores on these exams are not nearly normal, would your answers to parts (b) \- (f) change? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.