/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 A Pew Research survey asked 2,37... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A Pew Research survey asked 2,373 randomly sampled registered voters their political affiliation (Republican, Democrat, or Independent) and whether or not they identify as swing voters. \(35 \%\) of respondents identified as Independent, \(23 \%\) identified as swing voters, and \(11 \%\) identified as both. \(^{21}\) (a) Are being Independent and being a swing voter disjoint, i.e. mutually exclusive? (b) Draw a Venn diagram summarizing the variables and their associated probabilities. (c) What percent of voters are Independent but not swing voters? (d) What percent of voters are Independent or swing voters? (e) What percent of voters are neither Independent nor swing voters? (f) Is the event that someone is a swing voter independent of the event that someone is a political Independent?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) No, they are not disjoint. (b) Drawn as described. (c) 24%. (d) 47%. (e) 53%. (f) No, they are not independent.

Step by step solution

01

Determine If Events Are Mutually Exclusive

Two events are disjoint or mutually exclusive if they cannot occur at the same time. Here, being Independent and being a swing voter are not disjoint because 11% of respondents identified as both. This means some respondents are both politically Independent and swing voters.
02

Draw a Venn Diagram

Draw two overlapping circles, one representing Independents (35%) and the other representing swing voters (23%). In the overlapping region, which represents respondents who are both Independent and swing voters, place 11%. The part of the Independent circle not overlapping is 35% - 11% = 24%, and for swing voters 23% - 11% = 12%.
03

Calculate Percent Independent but Not Swing Voter

The part of the circle for Independents that does not overlap with swing voters is 35% (Independents) - 11% (both Independent and swing voters) = 24%. Thus, 24% of voters are Independent but not swing voters.
04

Calculate Percent Independent or Swing Voter

Use the formula for the union of two sets: \( P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) \). Here, \( P(A) = 0.35 \), \( P(B) = 0.23 \), and \( P(A \cap B) = 0.11 \). Therefore, \( P(A \cup B) = 0.35 + 0.23 - 0.11 = 0.47 \). Thus, 47% of voters are either Independent or swing voters.
05

Calculate Percent Neither Independent nor Swing Voter

Since 47% are either Independent or swing voters, 100% - 47% = 53% of voters are neither Independent nor swing voters.
06

Check for Independence of Events

Two events, \( A \) and \( B \), are independent if \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \times P(B) \). Here, \( P(\text{Independent}) = 0.35 \), \( P(\text{Swing}) = 0.23 \), \( P(\text{Independent} \cap \text{Swing}) = 0.11 \). The product \( P(A) \times P(B) = 0.35 \times 0.23 = 0.0805 \), which is not equal to 0.11. Therefore, these events are not independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mutually Exclusive Events
In probability theory, mutually exclusive events are those that cannot happen at the same time. Imagine having two groups that share no overlap. For this particular exercise, we need to determine if being an Independent voter and being a swing voter are mutually exclusive.
Since 11% of the respondents identified as both Independent voters and swing voters, this overlap indicates that these events are not mutually exclusive. If they were mutually exclusive, it would be impossible for someone to be in both groups simultaneously.
This example shows how to recognize non-mutually exclusive events in probability calculations by observing intersections in sets.
Venn Diagram
A Venn diagram is a helpful tool for visualizing the relationship between different groups. In probability, it allows us to show overlaps and calculate probabilities accurately. In this problem, we use two circles to represent the groups: one for Independents and the other for swing voters.
The circle for Independents represents 35%, and the swing voter circle represents 23%. The intersection of these circles, which illustrates individuals who are both Independent and swing voters, holds 11%.
This visualization helps us easily see that there are respondents who fit both categories and enables simple calculations for finding members exclusive to one group.
Independence of Events
Events are considered independent if the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other. Mathematically, two events A and B are independent if the probability of both events occurring is equal to the product of their individual probabilities: \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \times P(B) \).
In this exercise, Independence probability is 0.35, swing voter probability is 0.23, and the probability that someone is both is 0.11. Calculating the product gives 0.0805, not equal to 0.11.
Thus, identifying as an Independent voter does impact the likelihood of being a swing voter, showing these events aren't independent.
Probability Calculation
Understanding probability calculations is crucial for answering questions like those in this exercise. Let's discuss how to find probabilities for these groups based on given data.
First, to calculate the percentage of voters who are Independent but not swing voters, subtract the overlap (11%) from Independents (35%), giving us 24%.
Next, to find voters who fall into either category, use the union formula: \( P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) \). Substituting the values, we get 0.35 + 0.23 - 0.11 = 0.47 or 47%.
Finally, the complement of this gives us the probability of voters who fall into neither category: 100% - 47% = 53%. This exercise enhances our skills in practical probability calculations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assortative mating is a nonrandom mating pattern where individuals with similar genotypes and/or phenotypes mate with one another more frequently than what would be expected under a random mating pattern. Researchers studying this topic collected data on eye colors of 204 Scandinavian men and their female partners. The table below summarizes the results. For simplicity, we only include heterosexual relationships in this exercise. \(^{42}\) $$\begin{array}{lcccc} & {\text { Partner (female) }} & \\ & \text { Blue } & \text { Brown } & \text { Green } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Blue } & 78 & 23 & 13 & 114 \\ \text { Brown } & 19 & 23 & 12 & 54 \\ \text { Green } & 11 & 9 & 16 & 36 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 108 & 55 & 41 & 204\end{array}$$ (a) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent or his partner has blue eyes? (b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent with blue eyes has a partner with blue eyes? (c) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent with brown eyes has a partner with blue eyes? What about the probability of a randomly chosen male respondent with green eyes having a partner with blue eyes? (d) Does it appear that the eye colors of male respondents and their partners are independent? Explain your reasoning.

A Pew Research poll asked 1,306 Americans "From what you've read and heard, is there solid evidence that the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades, or not?". The table below shows the distribution of responses by party and ideology, where the counts have been replaced with relative frequencies. $$\begin{array}{lcccc} &{\text { Response }} & \\ & \begin{array}{c}\text { Earth is } \\ \text { warming }\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Not } \\\\\text { warming } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Don't Know } \\\\\text { Refuse }\end{array} & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Conservative Republican } & 0.11 & 0.20 & 0.02 & 0.33 \\ \text { Mod/Lib Republican } & 0.06 & 0.06 & 0.01 & 0.13 \\ \text { Mod/Cons Democrat } & 0.25 & 0.07 & 0.02 & 0.34 \\ \text { Liberal Democrat } & 0.18 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.20 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 0.60 & 0.34 & 0.06 & 1.00 \end{array}$$ (a) Are believing that the earth is warming and being a liberal Democrat mutually exclusive? (b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming or is a liberal Democrat? (c) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming given that he is a liberal Democrat? (d) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming given that he is a conservative Republican? (e) Does it appear that whether or not a respondent believes the earth is warming is independent of their party and ideology? Explain your reasoning. (f) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent is a moderate/liberal Republican given that he does not believe that the earth is warming?

A 2010 SurveyUSA poll asked 500 Los Angeles residents, "What is the best hamburger place in Southern California? Five Guys Burgers? In-N-Out Burger? Fat Burger? Tommy's Hamburgers? Umami Burger? Or somewhere else?" The distribution of responses by gender is shown below. \({ }^{41}\) $$\begin{array}{lrrr} & {\text { Gender }} & \\ & \text { Male } & \text { Female } & \text { Total } \\\\\hline \text { Five Guys Burgers } & 5 & 6 & 11 \\ \text { In-N-Out Burger } & 162 & 181 & 343 \\\\\text { Fat Burger } & 10 & 12 & 22 \\ \text { Tommy's Hamburgers } & 27 & 27 & 54 \\\\\text { Umami Burger } & 5 & 1 & 6 \\ \text { Other } & 26 & 20 & 46 \\\\\text { Not Sure } & 13 & 5 & 18 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 248 & 252 & 500\end{array}$$ (a) Are being female and liking Five Guys Burgers mutually exclusive? (b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male likes In-N-Out the best? (c) What is the probability that a randomly chosen female likes In-N-Out the best? (d) What is the probability that a man and a woman who are dating both like In-N-Out the best? Note any assumption you make and evaluate whether you think that assumption is reasonable. (e) What is the probability that a randomly chosen person likes Umami best or that person is female?

Imagine you have an urn containing 5 red, 3 blue, and 2 orange marbles in it. (a) What is the probability that the first marble you draw is blue? (b) Suppose you drew a blue marble in the first draw. If drawing with replacement, what is the probability of drawing a blue marble in the second draw? (c) Suppose you instead drew an orange marble in the first draw. If drawing with replacement, what is the probability of drawing a blue marble in the second draw? (d) If drawing with replacement, what is the probability of drawing two blue marbles in a row? (e) When drawing with replacement, are the draws independent? Explain.

About \(30 \%\) of human twins are identical, and the rest are fraternal. Identical twins are necessarily the same sex - half are males and the other half are females. One-quarter of fraternal twins are both male, one-quarter both female, and one-half are mixes: one male, one female. You have just become a parent of twins and are told they are both girls. Given this information, what is the probability that they are identical?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.