/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 The game of roulette involves sp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The game of roulette involves spinning a wheel with 38 slots: 18 red, 18 black, and 2 green. A ball is spun onto the wheel and will eventually land in a slot, where each slot has an equal chance of capturing the ball. (a) You watch a roulette wheel spin 3 consecutive times and the ball lands on a red slot each time. What is the probability that the ball will land on a red slot on the next spin? (b) You watch a roulette wheel spin 300 consecutive times and the ball lands on a red slot each time. What is the probability that the ball will land on a red slot on the next spin? (c) Are you equally confident of your answers to parts (a) and (b)? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \( \frac{9}{19} \); (b) \( \frac{9}{19} \); Yes, both are equally confident due to independent spins.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Total Outcomes

The roulette wheel has 38 slots: 18 red, 18 black, and 2 green. Each outcomes of a ball landing on any slot is equally likely. Thus, regardless of past spins, each spin is independent.
02

Calculate Probability for Part (a)

For part (a), which asks for the probability of landing on a red slot in the next spin, the probability is the ratio of red slots to total slots. This is given by \( \frac{18}{38} = \frac{9}{19} \approx 0.4737 \).
03

Calculate Probability for Part (b)

For part (b), even though the wheel landed on red 300 consecutive times previously, the wheel's spin remains independent. The probability of landing on a red slot on the next spin is again \( \frac{18}{38} = \frac{9}{19} \approx 0.4737 \).
04

Evaluate Confidence for Part (c)

In part (c), since each spin is independent, the probability remains the same in both cases. Thus, from a probabilistic standpoint, our confidence should be the same for both (a) and (b) despite the number of spins.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Roulette
The game of roulette is both thrilling and heavily reliant on the principles of probability. A standard roulette wheel contains 38 slots, which consist of 18 red slots, 18 black slots, and 2 green slots. Each slot has an equal chance of capturing the ball, making it a game that is fair in terms of probability.

When you spin the wheel, where the ball lands is entirely random and does not depend on the previous outcomes. This randomness is a fundamental part of how roulette works and why it entices so many to play. Understanding this randomness helps in comprehending the probability distribution of the game and highlights that past spins have no influence on future spins.

The allure of roulette also lies in its simplicity—just guess where the ball will land. However, despite its simplicity, the underlying probability concepts are essential to grasp!
Independence in Probability
Independence in probability is a crucial concept to understand, especially in games like roulette. When we say that a spin in roulette is independent, it means that the result of one spin does not affect the outcome of any other spin. Each spin has its own unique probability of landing on red, black, or green.

In probability terms, independence can be explained as follows: if two events A and B are independent, the probability of both occurring is the product of their probabilities. So in roulette, whether the ball has landed on red previously does not increase or decrease the chance of landing on red in the following spin. Each time the wheel spins, the probability resets.

This concept can sometimes feel counterintuitive, especially when a particular color appears frequently, but each spin remains unaffected by the history of previous spins.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation is an essential skill for analyzing outcomes in games and statistical scenarios. In roulette, the probability of landing on a red slot is calculated by dividing the number of red slots by the total number of slots.

Specifically, the calculation would be:
\[ P( ext{red}) = \frac{18}{38} = \frac{9}{19} \approx 0.4737 \]
This fraction indicates that about 47.37% of the time, the ball will land on red, assuming each slot is equally likely. This calculation remains constant, irrespective of previous spins.

To ensure accuracy in outcomes, always break down the problem into understanding the total number of favorable outcomes (in this case, red slots) over the total possible outcomes (total slots on the wheel).
Confidence in Probability
Having confidence in probability involves understanding and trusting the mathematical principles behind it. In the roulette example, students may question their confidence when faced with different scenarios: seeing reds after only a few spins versus seeing reds 300 times.

From a probabilistic perspective, confidence should be the same in both scenarios. This is because, due to the independence of each event (spin), the theoretical probability does not change regardless of prior results.

However, human intuition may lead people to feel less confident when observing unlikely events—such as 300 consecutive reds. Yet, relying on probabilistic principles assures us that each spin is still a fresh chance, with no memory of previous outcomes. Confidence should be rooted in this understanding, not just the number of trials or outcomes observed.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Backgammon is a board game for two players in which the playing pieces are moved according to the roll of two dice. Players win by removing all of their pieces from the board, so it is usually good to roll high numbers. You are playing backgammon with a friend and you roll two 6 s in your first roll and two 6 s in your second roll. Your friend rolls two \(3 \mathrm{~s}\) in his first roll and again in his second row. Your friend claims that you are cheating, because rolling double 6 s twice in a row is very unlikely. Using probability, show that your rolls were just as likely as his.

Assortative mating is a nonrandom mating pattern where individuals with similar genotypes and/or phenotypes mate with one another more frequently than what would be expected under a random mating pattern. Researchers studying this topic collected data on eye colors of 204 Scandinavian men and their female partners. The table below summarizes the results. For simplicity, we only include heterosexual relationships in this exercise. \(^{42}\) $$\begin{array}{lcccc} & {\text { Partner (female) }} & \\ & \text { Blue } & \text { Brown } & \text { Green } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Blue } & 78 & 23 & 13 & 114 \\ \text { Brown } & 19 & 23 & 12 & 54 \\ \text { Green } & 11 & 9 & 16 & 36 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 108 & 55 & 41 & 204\end{array}$$ (a) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent or his partner has blue eyes? (b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent with blue eyes has a partner with blue eyes? (c) What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent with brown eyes has a partner with blue eyes? What about the probability of a randomly chosen male respondent with green eyes having a partner with blue eyes? (d) Does it appear that the eye colors of male respondents and their partners are independent? Explain your reasoning.

A Pew Research poll asked 1,306 Americans "From what you've read and heard, is there solid evidence that the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades, or not?". The table below shows the distribution of responses by party and ideology, where the counts have been replaced with relative frequencies. $$\begin{array}{lcccc} &{\text { Response }} & \\ & \begin{array}{c}\text { Earth is } \\ \text { warming }\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Not } \\\\\text { warming } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Don't Know } \\\\\text { Refuse }\end{array} & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Conservative Republican } & 0.11 & 0.20 & 0.02 & 0.33 \\ \text { Mod/Lib Republican } & 0.06 & 0.06 & 0.01 & 0.13 \\ \text { Mod/Cons Democrat } & 0.25 & 0.07 & 0.02 & 0.34 \\ \text { Liberal Democrat } & 0.18 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.20 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 0.60 & 0.34 & 0.06 & 1.00 \end{array}$$ (a) Are believing that the earth is warming and being a liberal Democrat mutually exclusive? (b) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming or is a liberal Democrat? (c) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming given that he is a liberal Democrat? (d) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent believes the earth is warming given that he is a conservative Republican? (e) Does it appear that whether or not a respondent believes the earth is warming is independent of their party and ideology? Explain your reasoning. (f) What is the probability that a randomly chosen respondent is a moderate/liberal Republican given that he does not believe that the earth is warming?

A Pew Research survey asked 2,373 randomly sampled registered voters their political affiliation (Republican, Democrat, or Independent) and whether or not they identify as swing voters. \(35 \%\) of respondents identified as Independent, \(23 \%\) identified as swing voters, and \(11 \%\) identified as both. \(^{21}\) (a) Are being Independent and being a swing voter disjoint, i.e. mutually exclusive? (b) Draw a Venn diagram summarizing the variables and their associated probabilities. (c) What percent of voters are Independent but not swing voters? (d) What percent of voters are Independent or swing voters? (e) What percent of voters are neither Independent nor swing voters? (f) Is the event that someone is a swing voter independent of the event that someone is a political Independent?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.