Chapter 1: Problem 21
Prove that if \(\mu \in(0, \infty)\) and \(|\lambda|<1\), then \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} n^{\mu} \lambda^{n}=0\).
Short Answer
Expert verified
The limit is 0 because exponential decay dominates polynomial growth as \( n \to \infty \).
Step by step solution
01
Understanding the Limit Expression
We want to evaluate the limit \( \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} = 0 \), where \( \mu \in (0, \infty) \) and \( |\lambda| < 1 \). This involves the behavior of functions involving both polynomial growth (\( n^{\mu} \)) and exponential decay (\( \lambda^{n} \)).
02
Analyzing the Exponential Decay
Since \( |\lambda| < 1 \), we know that \( \lambda^{n} \) tends to 0 as \( n \) goes to infinity. Exponentially decaying terms (like \( \lambda^n \)) go to zero much faster than polynomial terms grow, indicating that the exponential part dominates in the limit.
03
Considering the Polynomial Growth
The term \( n^{\mu} \) grows polynomially, where \( \mu > 0 \). However, the speed of polynomial growth is much slower compared to the exponential decay since any power \( n^{\mu} \) grows slower than the decay of an exponentially decreasing sequence like \( \lambda^n \).
04
Applying the Limit
As \( n \to \infty \), the exponential decay \( \lambda^n \to 0 \) faster than any polynomial \( n^\mu \) grows. Thus, the combination \( n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} \) converges to 0.
05
Concluding the Proof
By dominating the power function \( n^{\mu} \) by the exponentially decaying function \( \lambda^n \), the expression \( \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} \) can be seen to approach zero. Therefore, the limit is 0.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Understanding Exponential Decay
In calculus, exponential decay refers to a process where a quantity decreases at a rate proportional to its current value. This creates an exponential function, often expressed as \( \lambda^n \), where \( |\lambda| < 1 \). Here's why exponential decay is crucial:
- As \( n \) increases, \( \lambda^n \) approaches zero very quickly. This happens because multiplying a number less than 1 by itself repeatedly makes it shrink very fast.
- An exponentially decaying function like \( \lambda^n \) will eventually become negligible compared to other terms that grow slower, like polynomial terms.
- This concept helps us understand why in the expression \( n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} \), the exponential part ensures that the whole expression heads towards zero.
Exploring Polynomial Growth
Polynomial growth, expressed as \( n^{\mu} \) where \( \mu > 0 \), involves terms increasing as a power of \( n \). Here's what to know about polynomial growth compared to other types of growth:
- Although \( n^{\mu} \) does grow, the growth is relatively slow compared to exponential functions. It grows by adding powers, not multiplying factors like exponential functions.
- Despite having a rate influenced by the power \( \mu \), it cannot surpass the decay rate of \( \lambda^n \) when \( \lambda \) is a fraction less than 1.
- This slower growth rate helps in calculating limits, as even if \( n^{\mu} \) becomes large, it cannot offset the zeroing effect of \( \lambda^n \).
Applying Limit Proof Techniques
Limit proof techniques in calculus help determine how functions behave as they approach infinity or other critical points. Here's how these techniques apply to our problem:
- Comparative Growth Analysis: By comparing exponential decay and polynomial growth, one appreciates that exponential decay overwhelms polynomial growth at infinity, pushing the entire expression towards zero.
- Squeezing Arguments: Sometimes, finding an upper bound for \( n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} \) helps. Since \( \lambda^n \) rapidly approaches zero, even a relatively large polynomial term can't prevent the product from becoming negligible.
- Direct Calculation: In some cases, direct manipulation of the expression is sufficient to show that \( n^{\mu} \lambda^{n} \to 0 \).