/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Use Simpson's Composite rule wit... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use Simpson's Composite rule with \(n=4,6,8, \ldots\), until successive approximations to the following integrals agree to within \(10^{-6}\). Determine the number of nodes required. Use the Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm to approximate the integral to within \(10^{-6}\), and count the number of nodes. Did Adaptive quadrature produce any improvement? a. \(\int_{0}^{x} x \cos x^{2} d x\) b. \(\int_{0}^{\pi} x \sin x^{2} d x\) c. \(\int_{0}^{\pi} x^{2} \cos x d x\) d. \(\int_{0}^{\pi} x^{2} \sin x d x\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer will be a list of numbers: The quantity of nodes required for each of the input integrals using both Simpson’s rule and the Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm. This will help ascertain which method was the most efficient in each case. Since the actual computation of these values requires numerical methods that can't be easily calculated without the help of a computer or calculator, a more precise answer will be unavailable here.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up the Integration Using Simpson's Rule

Simpson's rule is used as a numerical approximation to the definite integral of a function. Start applying the rule to the first integral of too. Remember to set \(n = 4\) initially. Divide the interval of integration [0,x] or [0,Ï€] into n equal parts, where n is an even integer. For each subinterval, approximate the area under the curve with a parabola.
02

Increase the Number of Nodes for Simpson's Rule

If the difference between successive approximations (i.e., the results from \(n = 4\) nodes and \(n = 6\) nodes, \(n = 6\) nodes and \(n = 8\) nodes, etc.) is greater than \(10^{-6}\), increase the number of nodes by 2 and repeat Step 1. Keep doing this until the difference is less than \(10^{-6}\). Count and note down the number of nodes required for the approximations to agree within \(10^{-6}\).
03

Set Up the Integration using Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm

Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm provides a more accurate approximation to the definite integral of a function over the same interval. Repeat the same process as in Step 1 but this time applying Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm.
04

Increase the Number of Nodes for Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm

Similarly, if the difference between successive approximations is greater than \(10^{-6}\), increase the number of nodes and repeat Step 3. Keep doing this until the difference is less than \(10^{-6}\). Count and note down the number of nodes.
05

Compare the Number of Nodes Required for Both the Methods

Finally, compare the number of nodes required for both Simpson’s Composite Rule and Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm. Determine if Adaptive quadrature produced any improvement, i.e., required fewer nodes to obtain an agreement within \(10^{-6}\). Repeat the same Steps 1-5 for the remaining integrals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Numerical Integration
Numerical integration is a cornerstone of computational mathematics, providing a means to approximate the area under a curve when the exact integral is difficult or impossible to find analytically.

It operates on a basic premise: since the exact area under a curve is challenging to calculate due to the curve's complexity, we can instead approximate this area by summing up the areas of simpler geometric shapes, such as rectangles, trapezoids, or parabolas, that closely 'fit' under the curve.

Techniques like the Midpoint Rule, Trapezoidal Rule, and Simpson's Rule emerge from this idea. Specifically, Simpson's Rule, which is the focus of our example problems, uses parabolas to approximate sections of the curve, striking a balance between accuracy and computational complexity for smooth functions.
Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm
While fixed-step methods like Simpson's Rule apply the same formula across evenly divided intervals, the Adaptive Quadrature Algorithm takes a more tailored approach. It intelligently adjusts the interval sizes based on the function's behavior.

The algorithm starts by estimating the integral over the entire interval. If the approximation does not meet the desired precision, the interval is subdivided, and the estimation process is repeated on these smaller intervals.

This 'divide and conquer' method allows the algorithm to use a finer mesh where the function changes rapidly and a coarser mesh where the function is smooth. Such adaptability typically results in fewer computations to achieve the same precision compared to non-adaptive methods, making it a powerful tool for numerical integration.
Successive Approximations
Successive approximations are iterative procedures where each guess at a solution is used to generate a more accurate subsequent guess.

In the context of numerical integration, successive approximations involve calculating the integral with an increasing number of nodes (or a decreasing step size), and then observing how the numerical result changes. If each successive approximation does not significantly differ from the previous one (within a pre-specified tolerance like \(10^{-6}\)), the process can be stopped, and the current approximation is accepted as sufficiently accurate.

This process is intrinsic to numerical methods like Simpson's Rule and Adaptive Quadrature, which iteratively refine their estimates to produce an accurate result.
Definite Integrals
Definite integrals serve as the fundamental concept behind all the numerical integration techniques, representing the exact area under the curve of a function between two specific points.

In essence, a definite integral gives the accumulated value, such as total distance traveled given a speed function, over the interval \([a, b]\). For many functions, especially those without elementary antiderivatives, numerical methods must be employed to estimate this area.

Using numerical methods to estimate definite integrals allows us to handle complex, real-world problems involving rates of change, such as calculating the work done by a variable force or the charge collected over time by a variable electric current.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

All calculus students know that the derivative of a function \(f\) at \(x\) can be defined as $$ f^{\prime}(x)=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$ Choose your favorite function \(f\), nonzero number \(x\), and computer or calculator. Generate approximations \(f_{n}^{\prime}(x)\) to \(f^{\prime}(x)\) by $$ f_{n}^{\prime}(x)=\frac{f\left(x+10^{-n}\right)-f(x)}{10^{-n}} $$ for \(n=1,2, \ldots, 20\), and describe what happens.

To simulate the thermal characteristics of disk brakes (see the following figure), D. A. Secrist and R. W. Hornbeck [SH] needed to approximate numerically the "area averaged lining temperature," \(T\), of the brake pad from the equation $$ T=\frac{\int_{r_{e}}^{r_{0}} T(r) r \theta_{p} d r}{\int_{r_{e}}^{r} r \theta_{p} d r} $$ where \(r_{e}\) represents the radius at which the pad-disk contact begins, \(n\) represents the outside radius of the pad-disk contact, \(\theta_{p}\) represents the angle subtended by the sector brake pads, and \(T(r)\) is the temperature at each point of the pad, obtained numerically from analyzing the heat equation (see Section 12.2). Suppose \(r_{e}=0.308 \mathrm{ft}, r_{0}=0.478 \mathrm{ft}, \theta_{p}=0.7051\) radians, and the temperatures given in the following table have been calculated at the various points on the disk. Approximate \(T\). $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline r(\mathrm{ft}) & T(r)\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right) & r(\mathrm{ft}) & T(r)\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right) & r(\mathrm{ft}) & T(r)\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right) \\ \hline 0.308 & 640 & 0.376 & 1034 & 0.444 & 1204 \\ 0.325 & 794 & 0.393 & 1064 & 0.461 & 1222 \\ 0.342 & 885 & 0.410 & 1114 & 0.478 & 1239 \\ 0.359 & 943 & 0.427 & 1152 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Romberg integration for approximating \(\int_{a}^{b} f(x) d x\) gives \(R_{11}=8, R_{22}=16 / 3\), and \(R_{33}=208 / 45\). Find \(R_{31}\).

Use the forward-difference formulas and backward-difference formulas to determine each missing entry in the following tables. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { a. }\\\ &\begin{array}{c|c|c} x & f(x) & f^{\prime}(x) \\ \hline-0.3 & 1.9507 & \\ -0.2 & 2.0421 & \\ -0.1 & 2.0601 & \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { b. }\\\ &\begin{array}{c|c|c} x & f(x) & f^{\prime}(x) \\ \hline 1.0 & 1.0000 & \\ 1.2 & 1.2625 & \\ 1.4 & 1.6595 & \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

Consider the function $$ e(h)=\frac{\varepsilon}{h}+\frac{h^{2}}{6} M $$ where \(M\) is a bound for the third derivative of a function. Show that \(e(h)\) has a minimum at \(\sqrt[3]{3 \varepsilon / M}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.