/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a uniform distribution on the interval \([0, \theta]\), so that $$ f(x)= \begin{cases}\frac{1}{\theta} & 0 \leq x \leq \theta \\ 0 & \text { otherwise }\end{cases} $$ Then if \(Y=\max \left(X_{i}\right)\), by the first proposition in Section \(5.5, U=Y / \theta\) has density function $$ f_{U}(u)=\left\\{\begin{array}{cl} n u^{n-1} & 0 \leq u \leq 1 \\ 0 & \text { otherwise } \end{array}\right. $$ a. Use \(f_{U}(u)\) to verify that $$ P\left[(\alpha / 2)^{1 / n} \leq \frac{Y}{\theta} \leq(1-\alpha / 2)^{1 / n}\right]=1-\alpha $$ and use this to derive a \(100(1-\alpha) \%\) CI for \(\theta\). b. Verify that \(P\left(\alpha^{1 / n} \leq Y / \theta \leq 1\right)=1-\alpha\), and derive a \(100(1-\alpha) \%\) CI for \(\theta\) based on this probability statement. c. Which of the two intervals derived previously is shorter? If your waiting time for a morning bus is uniformly distributed and observed waiting times are \(x_{1}=4.2, x_{2}=3.5, x_{3}=1.7\), \(x_{4}=1.2\), and \(x_{5}=2.4\), derive a 95\% CI for \(\theta\) by using the shorter of the two intervals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The shorter CI is from Step 3: [4.2, 9.27].

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Given Distribution and Variable Transformation

The problem gives a random sample from a uniform distribution on the interval \([0, \theta]\). The maximum of the sample \(Y = \max(X_i)\) is transformed into \(U = \frac{Y}{\theta}\), which has a derived density function \(f_U(u) = nu^{n-1}\) for \(0 \leq u \leq 1\). We use this knowledge to find a confidence interval for \(\theta\).
02

Confidence Interval Derivation for Part (a)

To verify and derive the confidence interval (CI), we calculate \(P((\alpha/2)^{1/n} \leq U \leq (1-\alpha/2)^{1/n})\). Integrating the density function, we get:\[P((\alpha/2)^{1/n} \leq U \leq (1-\alpha/2)^{1/n}) = \int_{(\alpha/2)^{1/n}}^{(1-\alpha/2)^{1/n}} n u^{n-1} \, du\]This integral evaluates to:\[[(1-\alpha/2)^{1/n}]^n - [(\alpha/2)^{1/n}]^n = 1 - \alpha\]Thus, the \(100(1-\alpha)\%\) CI for \(\theta\) using this method is:\[\frac{Y}{(1-\alpha/2)^{1/n}} \leq \theta \leq \frac{Y}{(\alpha/2)^{1/n}}\]
03

Confidence Interval Derivation for Part (b)

For \(P(\alpha^{1/n} \leq Y/\theta \leq 1) = 1 - \alpha\), use the cumulative method:\[P(\alpha^{1/n} \leq U \leq 1) = \int_{\alpha^{1/n}}^{1} n u^{n-1} \, du\]Evaluating it gives:\[1 - (\alpha^{1/n})^n = 1 - \alpha\]Hence, the \(100(1-\alpha)\%\) CI for \(\theta\) is:\[Y \leq \theta \leq \frac{Y}{\alpha^{1/n}}\]
04

Compare CI Lengths for Parts (a) and (b)

To find which interval is shorter, compare:1. From Step 2: \(\frac{Y}{(1-\alpha/2)^{1/n}} - \frac{Y}{(\alpha/2)^{1/n}}\)2. From Step 3: \(\frac{Y}{\alpha^{1/n}} - Y\)Interval 2 (Step 3) is usually shorter as it begins at \(Y\), giving more precision.
05

Application of the CI Using Given Data

Given observed values \(x_1=4.2, x_2=3.5, x_3=1.7, x_4=1.2, x_5=2.4\), calculate \(Y = \max(x_i) = 4.2\). For a 95% CI using the shorter interval (Step 3):\[\frac{Y}{\alpha^{1/n}} = \frac{4.2}{0.05^{1/5}} \approx 9.27\]Thus, the 95% CI for \(\theta\) using the shorter interval is \([4.2, 9.27]\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) is a method used in statistics to estimate the parameters of a probability distribution. Essentially, it seeks the parameter values that make the observed data most probable. Suppose you are working with a uniform distribution on the interval \([0, \theta]\). The likelihood function for a sample \(X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n\) becomes maximal when \(\theta\) is equal to the maximum observed value, \(Y = \max(X_i)\). In our exercise, this is why \(Y\) is used extensively in calculating the confidence interval for \(\theta\). MLE provides a point estimate of the parameter, and such estimates are often foundational for constructing confidence intervals.
Probability Density Function
The Probability Density Function (PDF) represents how the probability of a continuous random variable is distributed over its possible values. For a uniform distribution, the PDF is constant over its interval, meaning every outcome is equally likely within that range. In the given problem, the PDF is defined as: - \(f(x) = \frac{1}{\theta}\) for \(0 \leq x \leq \theta\) - 0 otherwise.For the derived variable \(U = \frac{Y}{\theta}\), the PDF is: - \(f_U(u) = nu^{n-1}\) for \(0 \leq u \leq 1\) - 0 otherwise.This mathematical function is crucial because it allows the calculation of probabilities and, consequently, the confidence intervals for \(\theta\). By integrating the PDF over a given range, we can find the probabilities required to inform our confidence interval calculations.
Uniform Distribution
Uniform Distribution is a type of probability distribution in which every outcome in the interval has an equal likelihood of occurring. This distribution is one of the simplest to understand and is used often to model situations where we assume all values are equally likely. In our exercise, we deal with a continuous uniform distribution defined over the interval \([0, \theta]\). This means that any value within this range is equally likely to be sampled. This simplicity makes the uniform distribution an excellent starting point for statistical analysis and exercises involving maximum likelihood estimation, as seen in this problem. With uniform distributions, the maximum observed value \(Y\) becomes a natural estimator for \(\theta\), further simplifying statistical computations and interpretations. Understanding uniform distribution can significantly enhance your grasp of foundational statistical methods and their applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If you go to a major league baseball game, how long do you expect the game to be? From the 2,429 games played in 2001 , here is a random sample of 25 times in minutes: \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}352 & 150 & 164 & 167 & 225 & 159 & 142 & 182 & 229 & 163 \\ 188 & 197 & 189 & 235 & 161 & 195 & 177 & 166 & 195 & 160 \\ 154 & 130 & 189 & 188 & 225 & & & & & \end{array}\) This is one of those rare instances in which we can do a confidence interval and compare with the true population mean. The mean of all 2,429 lengths is \(178.29\) (almost \(3 \mathrm{~h}\) ). a. Compute the \(t\)-based confidence interval of Section \(8.3 .\) b. Use a normal plot to see if part (a) is valid. c. Generate a bootstrap sample of 999 means. d. Use the standard deviation for part (c) to get a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean. e. Investigate the distribution of the bootstrap means to see if the CI of part (d) is valid. f. Use part (c) to form the \(95 \%\) confidence interval using the percentile method. g. Say which interval should be used and explain why. Does your interval include the true value, \(178.29\) ?

According to the article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" (Polymer Testing, 2009: 567-571), "tests currently used for condoms are surrogates for the challenges they face in use", including a test for holes, an inflation test, a package seal test, and tests of dimensions and lubricant quality (all fertile territory for the use of statistical methodology!). The investigators developed a new test that adds cyclic strain to a level well below breakage and determines the number of cycles to break. A sample of 20 condoms of one particular type resulted in a sample mean number of 1584 and a sample standard deviation of 607 . Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at the \(99 \%\) confidence level for the true average number of cycles to break. [Note: The article presented the results of hypothesis tests based on the \(t\) distribution; the validity of these depends on assuming normal population distributions.]

It is important that face masks used by firefighters be able to withstand high temperatures because firefighters commonly work in temperatures of \(200-500^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). In a test of one type of mask, 11 of 55 masks had lenses pop out at \(250^{\circ}\). Construct a \(90 \%\) CI for the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at \(250^{\circ}\).

Aphid infestation of fruit trees can be controlled either by spraying with pesticide or by inundation with ladybugs. In a particular area, four different groves of fruit trees are selected for experimentation. The first three groves are sprayed with pesticides 1,2 , and 3 , respectively, and the fourth is treated with ladybugs, with the following results on yield: \begin{tabular}{llll} \hline Treatment & \multicolumn{1}{l}{\(n_{i}\) (number of } & \({\bar{x}_{i}}\) (bushels/ \\ & trees) & tree) & \\ \hline 1 & 100 & \(10.5\) & \(1.5\) \\ 2 & 90 & \(10.0\) & \(1.3\) \\ 3 & 100 & \(10.1\) & \(1.8\) \\ 4 & 120 & \(10.7\) & \(1.6\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Let \(\mu_{i}=\) the true average yield (bushels/tree) after receiving the \(i\) th treatment. Then $$ \theta=\frac{1}{3}\left(\mu_{1}+\mu_{2}+\mu_{3}\right)-\mu_{4} $$ measures the difference in true average yields between treatment with pesticides and treatment with ladybugs. When \(n_{1}, n_{2}, n_{3}\), and \(n_{4}\) are all large, the estimator \(\hat{\theta}\) obtained by replacing each \(\mu_{i}\) by \(\bar{X}_{i}\) is approximately normal. Use this to derive a large-sample \(100(1-\alpha) \%\) CI for \(\theta\), and compute the \(95 \%\) interval for the given data.

Even as traditional markets for sweetgum lumber have declined, large section solid timbers traditionally used for construction bridges and mats have become increasingly scarce. The article "Development of Novel Industrial Laminated Planks from Sweetgum Lumber" (J. of Bridge Engr., 2008: 64-66) described the manufacturing and testing of composite beams designed to add value to low- grade sweetgum lumber. Here is data on the modulus of rupture (psi; the article contained summary data expressed in MPa): \(\begin{array}{llllll}6807.99 & 7637.06 & 6663.28 & 6165.03 & 6991.41 & 6992.23 \\ 6981.46 & 7569.75 & 7437.88 & 6872.39 & 7663.18 & 6032.28 \\\ 6906.04 & 6617.17 & 6984.12 & 7093.71 & 7659.50 & 7378.61 \\ 7295.54 & 6702.76 & 7440.17 & 8053.26 & 8284.75 & 7347.95 \\ 7422.69 & 7886.87 & 6316.67 & 7713.65 & 7503.33 & 7674.99\end{array}\) a. Verify the plausibility of assuming a normal population distribution. b. Estimate the true average modulus of rupture in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. c. Predict the modulus for a single beam in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. How does the resulting prediction compare to the estimate in (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.