/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 Suppose that \(10 \%\) of all st... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that \(10 \%\) of all steel shafts produced by a process are nonconforming but can be reworked (rather than having to be scrapped). Consider a random sample of 200 shafts, and let \(X\) denote the number among these that are nonconforming and can be reworked. What is the (approximate) probability that \(X\) is a. At most 30 ? b. Less than 30 ? c. Between 15 and 25 (inclusive)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 0.9934, b. 0.9875, c. 0.8064

Step by step solution

01

Define the Distribution

We start by determining the type of distribution that applies to the problem. Here, \(X\), the number of nonconforming shafts, follows a binomial distribution. This is because each shaft can be nonconforming with a probability of \(p = 0.1\) and there are a fixed number of independent trials, \(n = 200\). Hence, \(X \sim \text{Binomial}(n=200, p=0.1)\).
02

Apply the Normal Approximation

For large \(n\), the binomial distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution. The mean and variance of \(X\) are \(\mu = np = 200 \times 0.1 = 20\) and \(\sigma^2 = np(1-p) = 200 \times 0.1 \times 0.9 = 18\). Thus, \(X\) can be represented approximately as \(N(20, 18)\).
03

Calculate Probability for Part (a)

For part (a), we need to find \(P(X \leq 30)\). Using the normal approximation, calculate the z-score: \[ z = \frac{30 + 0.5 - \mu}{\sigma} = \frac{30.5 - 20}{\sqrt{18}} \approx 2.48 \] We then find \(P(Z \leq 2.48)\) using the standard normal distribution table, which gives approximately 0.9934.
04

Calculate Probability for Part (b)

For part (b), calculate \(P(X < 30)\). This is \(P(X \leq 29)\) due to continuity correction: \[ z = \frac{29 + 0.5 - 20}{\sqrt{18}} = \frac{29.5 - 20}{\sqrt{18}} \approx 2.24 \] \(P(Z \leq 2.24)\) is approximately 0.9875 from the z-table.
05

Calculate Probability for Part (c)

For part (c), calculate \(P(15 \leq X \leq 25)\). Use the continuity correction to find \(P(14.5 < X < 25.5)\).Calculate z-scores:- For 14.5: \[ z = \frac{14.5 - 20}{\sqrt{18}} \approx -1.30 \]- For 25.5: \[ z = \frac{25.5 - 20}{\sqrt{18}} \approx 1.30 \]Using the z-table,\(P(Z \leq 1.30) \approx 0.9032\) and \(P(Z \leq -1.30) \approx 0.0968\).Hence, the probability is \(0.9032 - 0.0968 = 0.8064\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Approximation
When dealing with a binomial distribution, the normal approximation can be a handy tool. This approximation is most useful when the number of trials, denoted by \( n \), is large, and the probability of success, denoted by \( p \), is neither too close to 0 nor too close to 1. In our exercise, we're working with 200 steel shafts, and 10% of these are nonconforming. Given this is a large number, a normal approximation simplifies calculations.

A binomial distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution when \( np > 5 \) and \( n(1-p) > 5 \). In this example, \( np = 20 \) and \( n(1-p) = 180 \), which easily meet these criteria. The mean (\( \mu \)) and variance (\( \sigma^2 \)) of the binomial distribution are \( np \) and \( np(1-p) \) respectively. Thus, the normal distribution's parameters in this scenario are calculated as a mean of 20 and standard deviation calculated as the square root of 18. Now, instead of complex binomial probability calculations, we can use normal distribution tables, which are usually easier to interpret.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation using normal approximation involves converting binomial data to a standard normal distribution problem. This involves z-scores, which are standardized scores that relate binomial counts to the standard normal distribution.

To find the probability that a variable \( X \) falls within a certain range, you will often compute a z-score using the formula: \[ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma} \] Where:\( x \) is the value of \( X \) you're interested in, \( \mu \) is the mean of the distribution, and \( \sigma \) is the standard deviation.

In practice, probabilities are determined by checking z-score values against a standard normal distribution table or using technology to find the area under the curve for those z-scores. For instance, to find the probability of \( X \leq 30 \), we determine the z-score and then find the corresponding probability in the z-table. This approach converts an otherwise intricate set of binomial calculations into more manageable normal distribution queries.
Continuity Correction
A crucial factor when using normal approximation for discrete distributions like the binomial is the continuity correction. This adjustment offers a more accurate approximation. When converting from a discrete to a continuous distribution, small adjustments (usually ±0.5) are added to the value of \( X \) before calculating a z-score.

This means, for the probability \( P(X \leq 30) \), instead, calculate \( P(X \leq 30.5) \). By adding 0.5, you're correcting for the fact that a continuous distribution assumes data between whole numbers. It's like smoothing out the steps between the intervals of a staircase, which better approximates the cumulative nature of a standard normal distribution.

  • For "at most" scenarios like \( P(X \leq 30) \), use \( 30.5 \) instead.

  • For "less than" cases, such as \( P(X < 30) \), use \( 29.5 \) to represent just beneath the threshold.

  • When considering "between" scenarios like \( P(15 \leq X \leq 25) \), apply continuity correction on both bounds: \( 14.5 \) and \( 25.5 \).


This correction helps ensure the approximation closely reflects the true probability, leading to more reliable solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A mode of a continuous distribution is a value \(x^{*}\) that maximizes \(f(x)\). a. What is the mode of a normal distribution with parameters \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) ? b. Does the uniform distribution with parameters \(A\) and \(B\) have a single mode? Why or why not? c. What is the mode of an exponential distribution with parameter \(\lambda\) ? (Draw a picture.) d. If \(X\) has a gamma distribution with parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), and \(\alpha>1\), find the mode. [Hint: \(\ln [f(x)]\) will be maximized if and only if \(f(x)\) is, and it may be simpler to take the derivative of \(\ln [f(x)]\).] e. What is the mode of a chi-squared distribution having \(v\) degrees of freedom?

Based on data from a dart-throwing experiment, the article "Shooting Darts" (Chance, Summer 1997: 16-19) proposed that the horizontal and vertical errors from aiming at a point target should be independent of each other, each with a normal distribution having mean 0 and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). It can then be shown that the pdf of the distance \(V\) from the target to the landing point is $$ f(v)=\frac{v}{\sigma^{2}} \cdot e^{-v^{2} /\left(2 \sigma^{2}\right)} \quad v>0 $$ a. This pdf is a member of what family introduced in this chapter? b. If \(\sigma=20 \mathrm{~mm}\) (close to the value suggested in the paper), what is the probability that a dart will land within \(25 \mathrm{~mm}\) (roughly \(1 \mathrm{in.}\) ) of the target?

The article "The Load-Life Relationship for M50 Bearings with Silicon Nitride Ceramic Balls" (Lubricat. Engrg., 1984: 153-159) reports the accompanying data on bearing load life (million revs.) for bearings tested at a \(6.45-\mathrm{kN}\) load. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrr}47.1 & 68.1 & 68.1 & 90.8 & 103.6 & 106.0 & 115.0 \\\ 126.0 & 146.6 & 229.0 & 240.0 & 240.0 & 278.0 & 278.0 \\ 289.0 & 289.0 & 367.0 & 385.9 & 392.0 & 505.0 & \end{array}\) a. Construct a normal probability plot. Is normality plausible? b. Construct a Weibull probability plot. Is the Weibull distribution family plausible?

Suppose only \(70 \%\) of all drivers in a state regularly wear a seat belt. A random sample of 500 drivers is selected. What is the probability that a. Between 320 and 370 (inclusive) of the drivers in the sample regularly wear a seat belt? b. Fewer than 325 of those in the sample regularly wear a seat belt? Fewer than 315 ?

Let \(X\) denote the ultimate tensile strength (ksi) at \(-200^{\circ}\) of a randomly selected steel specimen of a certain type that exhibits "cold brittleness" at low temperatures. Suppose that \(X\) has a Weibull distribution with \(\alpha=20\) and \(\beta=100\). a. What is the probability that \(X\) is at most \(105 \mathrm{ksi}\) ? b. If specimen after specimen is selected, what is the long-run proportion having strength values between 100 and \(105 \mathrm{ksi}\) ? c. What is the median of the strength distribution?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.