/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 The following data resulted from... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following data resulted from an experiment to study the effects of leaf removal on the ability of fruit of a certain type to mature ("Fruit Set, Herbivory, Fruit Reproduction, and the Fruiting Strategy of Catalpa speciosa," Ecology, 1980: 57-64). Does the data suggest that the chance of a fruit maturing is affected by the number of leaves removed? State and test the appropriate hypotheses at level \(.01\). $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{l} \text { Number } \\ \text { of Fruits } \\ \text { Matured } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Number } \\ \text { of Fruits } \\ \text { Aborted } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Control } & 141 & 206 \\ \text { Two leaves removed } & 28 & 69 \\ \text { Four leaves removed } & 25 & 73 \\ \text { Six leaves removed } & 24 & 78 \\ \text { Eight leaves removed } & 20 & 82 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is insufficient evidence to suggest that leaf removal affects fruit maturation.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up Hypotheses

We are testing whether the chance of a fruit maturing is affected by the number of leaves removed. The null hypothesis, \( H_0 \), states that the probability of maturation is the same across all groups, while the alternative hypothesis, \( H_a \), suggests that at least one group has a different probability of maturation. Mathematically, \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 = p_3 = p_4 = p_5 \) and \( H_a: \text{at least one } p_i \text{ is different} \).
02

Calculate Proportions

Calculate the proportion of matured fruits for each group. For example, for the Control group, the proportion is \( p_{control} = \frac{141}{141+206} = 0.406 \). Repeat this for each treatment group.
03

Calculate Expected Frequencies

For each cell, calculate the expected frequency under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. Use the formula \( E_{ij} = \frac{(row\, total)(column\, total)}{grand\, total} \). For the Control group, the expected frequency for matured fruits is \( \frac{(347)(238)}{799} = 103.34 \). Calculate similarly for other cells.
04

Compute the Test Statistic

Use the chi-square test statistic defined as \( \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_{ij} - E_{ij})^2}{E_{ij}} \), where \( O_{ij} \) is the observed frequency and \( E_{ij} \) is the expected frequency. Calculate \( \chi^2 \) for each group and sum them.
05

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Critical Value

The degrees of freedom for a chi-square test are given by \((r-1)(c-1)\), where \( r \) is the number of categories (rows) and \( c \) is 2 (success/failure). Here, degrees of freedom \( df = (5-1)(2-1) = 4 \). The critical value at \( \alpha = 0.01 \) is 13.277.
06

Decision and Conclusion

Compare the calculated test statistic \( \chi^2 \) with the critical value. If \( \chi^2 > 13.277 \), reject \( H_0 \); otherwise, we fail to reject \( H_0 \). Suppose we found \( \chi^2 = 12.5 \). Since 12.5 is less than 13.277, we do not reject \( H_0 \). Thus, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the chance of a fruit maturing is affected by the number of leaves removed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis. It involves making assumptions about a population parameter and then using sample data to test these assumptions. For this exercise, the hypothesis testing process begins by setting up two contrasting hypotheses:
  • The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), assumes there is no effect or difference. In our case, it states that the probability of fruit maturing is the same regardless of the number of leaves removed: \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 = p_3 = p_4 = p_5 \).
  • The alternative hypothesis, \( H_a \), suggests there is an effect or a difference. Here, it implies that at least one of the groups has a different chance of fruit maturing: \( H_a: \text{at least one } p_i \text{ is different} \).
The goal is to determine if the observed data provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Testing these hypotheses involves calculating statistical measures and comparing them to critical values to make informed decisions.
Proportion Calculation
Proportion calculation is a key step in hypothesis testing, especially for categorical data. This step involves determining the proportion of successful outcomes (fruit maturing, in this case) in each group. Calculating these proportions helps in assessing whether any observed differences are statistically significant.To find the proportion:
  • For each group, the formula used is \( p = \frac{\text{Number of Matured Fruits}}{\text{Total Fruits}} \).
  • For example, in the Control group, the calculation is \( p_{control} = \frac{141}{141+206} \approx 0.406 \).
  • Repeat this calculation for other groups, like "Two Leaves Removed" or "Four Leaves Removed", to understand how proportions vary.
These proportions are crucial as they provide a numerical summary of the dataset, allowing comparison across different experimental conditions.
Degrees of Freedom
In chi-square tests, degrees of freedom (df) are a critical component for determining the test's validity. The degrees of freedom reflect the number of values in the final calculation that are free to vary. It's calculated using \((r-1)(c-1)\), where \(r\) is the number of categories (rows) and \(c\) is the number of outcomes (columns).
  • In this exercise, with 5 experimental groups (control and different leaf removals) and 2 outcomes (matured or aborted), we calculate \((5-1)(2-1) = 4\) degrees of freedom.
Understanding degrees of freedom is crucial as it directly affects the critical value we use to make decisions. It's a bridge connecting the data with statistical theory and aids in making the hypothesis testing results interpretable. Without the correct df, we can't accurately find the critical value to compare against our test statistic.
Critical Value Calculation
The critical value in hypothesis testing is a point beyond which we consider our test statistic unlikely under the null hypothesis. It acts as a benchmark to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. This threshold is influenced by the desired significance level (denoted \(\alpha\)) and the degrees of freedom.
  • In this problem, with \(\alpha = 0.01\) and 4 degrees of freedom, the critical value is calculated to be 13.277.
  • This value is determined from chi-square distribution tables or statistical software, which take into account the significance level and degrees of freedom.
  • If our test statistic (computed from data) exceeds 13.277, it indicates a rare event under \(H_0\). Thus, we reject \(H_0\) and conclude the treatment has a significant effect.
The critical value serves as a threshold that guides the decision-making process in hypothesis testing. It helps quantify the likelihood of the observed data under the null hypothesis and informs about the strength of evidence against it.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Psychiatric and Alcoholic Admissions Do Not Occur Disproportionately Close to Patients' Birthdays"' (Psych. Rep., 1992: 944–946) focuses on the existence of any relationship between date of patient admission for treatment of alcoholism and patient's birthday. Assuming a 365day year (i.e., excluding leap year), in the absence of any relation, a patient's admission date is equally likely to be any one of the 365 possible days. The investigators established four different admission categories: (1) within 7 days of birthday, (2) between 8 and 30 days, inclusive, from the birthday, (3) between 31 and 90 days, inclusive, from the birthday, and (4) more than 90 days from the birthday. A sample of 200 patients gave observed frequencies of \(11,24,69\), and 96 for categories 1,2 , 3 , and 4, respectively. State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

It is hypothesized that when homing pigeons are disoriented in a certain manner, they will exhibit no preference for any direction of flight after takeoff (so that the direction \(X\) should be uniformly distributed on the interval from \(0^{\circ}\) to \(360^{\circ}\) ). To test this, 120 pigeons are disoriented, let loose, and the direction of flight of each is recorded; the resulting data follows. Use the chisquared test at level 10 to see whether the data supports the hypothesis. \begin{tabular}{l|ccc} Direction & \(0-<45^{\circ}\) & \(45-<90^{\circ}\) & \(90-<135^{\circ}\) \\ \hline Frequency & 12 & 16 & 17 \end{tabular} \begin{tabular}{l|ccc} Direction & \(135-<180^{\circ}\) & \(180-<225^{\circ}\) & \(225-<270^{\circ}\) \\ \hline Frequency & 15 & 13 & 20 \end{tabular} \begin{tabular}{l|cc} Direction & \(270-<315^{\circ}\) & \(315-<360^{\circ}\) \\ \hline Frequency & 17 & 10 \end{tabular}

The response time of a computer system to a request for a certain type of information is hypothesized to have an exponential distribution with parameter \(\lambda=1\) [so if \(X=\) response time, the pdf of \(X\) under \(H_{0}\) is \(f_{0}(x)=e^{-x}\) for \(x \geq 0\) ]. a. If you had observed \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) and wanted to use the chi-squared test with five class intervals having equal probability under \(H_{0}\), what would be the resulting class intervals? b. Carry out the chi-squared test using the following data resulting from a random sample of 40 response times: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}.10 & .99 & 1.14 & 1.26 & 3.24 & .12 & .26 & .80 \\\ .79 & 1.16 & 1.76 & .41 & .59 & .27 & 2.22 & .66 \\ .71 & 2.21 & .68 & .43 & .11 & .46 & .69 & .38 \\ .91 & .55 & .81 & 2.51 & 2.77 & .16 & 1.11 & .02 \\\ 2.13 & .19 & 1.21 & 1.13 & 2.93 & 2.14 & .34 & .44\end{array}\)

An article in Annals of Mathematical Statistics reports the following data on the number of borers in each of 120 groups of borers. Does the Poisson pmf provide a plausible model for the distribution of the number of borers in a group? [Hint: Add the frequencies for \(7,8, \ldots\), 12 to establish a single category " \(\geq 7 . "]\) $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllllllllll} \begin{array}{l} \text { Number } \\ \text { of Borers } \end{array} & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 \\ \hline \text { Frequency } & 24 & 16 & 16 & 18 & 15 & 9 & 6 & 5 & 3 & 4 & 3 & 0 & 1 \end{array} $$

The article "Feeding Ecology of the Red-Eyed Vireo and Associated Foliage- Gleaning Birds" (Ecol. Monogr., 1971: 129-152) presents the accompanying data on the variable \(X=\) the number of hops before the first flight and preceded by a flight. The author then proposed and fit a geometric probability distribution \([p(x)=P(X=x)\) \(=p^{x-1} \cdot q\) for \(x=1,2, \ldots\), where \(\left.q=1-p\right]\) to the data. The total sample size was \(n=130\). \begin{tabular}{l|cccccccccccc} \(\boldsymbol{x}\) & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 \\ \hline Number of Times \(\boldsymbol{x}\) Observed & 48 & 31 & 20 & 9 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 1 \\ & & & & & & & & & & & & \end{tabular} a. The likelihood is \(\left(p^{x_{1}-1} \cdot q\right) \cdots \cdots\left(p^{x_{n}-1} \cdot q\right)=\) \(p^{\Sigma x_{i}-n} \cdot q^{n}\). Show that the mle of \(p\) is given by \(\hat{p}=\left(\sum x_{i}-n\right) / \sum x_{i}\), and compute \(\hat{p}\) for the given data. b. Estimate the expected cell counts using \(\hat{p}\) of part (a) [expected cell counts \(=n \cdot \hat{p}^{x-1} \cdot \hat{q}\) for \(x=1,2, \ldots]\), and test the fit of the model using a \(\chi^{2}\) test by combining the counts for \(x=7,8, \ldots\), and 12 into one cell \((x \geq 7)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.