/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 79 Let \(y=\) sales at a fast-food ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(y=\) sales at a fast-food outlet ($$\$ 1000$$ 's ), \(x_{1}=\) number of competing outlets within a 1-mile radius, \(x_{2}=\) population within a 1-mile radius (1000's of people), and \(x_{3}\) be an indicator variable that equals 1 if the outlet has a drive-up window and 0 otherwise. Suppose that the true regression model is $$ Y=10.0-1.2 x_{1}+6.8 x_{2}+15.3 x_{3}+\varepsilon $$ a. What is the mean value of sales when the number of competing outlets is 2 , there are 8000 people within a 1-mile radius, and the outlet has a drive-up window? b. What is the mean value of sales for an outlet without a drive-up window that has three competing outlets and 5000 people within a 1-mile radius? c. Interpret \(\beta_{3}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) $77300, b) $40400, c) \(\beta_3 = 15.3\) implies a $15300 increase in sales with a drive-up window.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Given Information for Part (a)

To find the mean value of sales when \( x_1 = 2 \), \( x_2 = 8 \) (since the population is 8000, divide by 1000), and \( x_3 = 1 \) (because there is a drive-up window), we will plug these values into the regression function.
02

Compute the Mean Value of Sales for Part (a)

Substitute the given values into the regression equation:\[Y = 10.0 - 1.2 (2) + 6.8 (8) + 15.3 (1)\] Simplify this to find the mean value.
03

Calculate Result for Part (a)

First, calculate the impact of each variable:- Competing outlets impact: \(-1.2 \times 2 = -2.4\)- Population impact: \(6.8 \times 8 = 54.4\)- Drive-up window impact: \(15.3 \times 1 = 15.3\)Combine them with the intercept:\[Y = 10 + (-2.4) + 54.4 + 15.3 = 77.3\]The mean sales value is 77.3 (in \(1000s), or \)77300.
04

Identify Given Information for Part (b)

For an outlet without a drive-up window, (\(x_3 = 0\)), with \( x_1 = 3 \) competing outlets, and \( x_2 = 5 \) (5000 people within a 1-mile radius), substitute these values into the regression equation.
05

Compute the Mean Value of Sales for Part (b)

Substitute the given values into the equation:\[Y = 10.0 - 1.2 (3) + 6.8 (5) + 15.3 (0)\]Simplify the expression to find the mean sales value.
06

Calculate Result for Part (b)

Calculate the impact of each variable:- Competing outlets impact: \(-1.2 \times 3 = -3.6\)- Population impact: \(6.8 \times 5 = 34.0\)- No drive-up window impact: \(15.3 \times 0 = 0\)Combine them with the intercept:\[Y = 10 + (-3.6) + 34.0 + 0 = 40.4\]The mean sales value is 40.4 (in \(1000s), or \)40400.
07

Interpret \(\beta_3\)

The coefficient \(\beta_3 = 15.3\) represents the change in the mean value of sales when the outlet has a drive-up window.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Multiple Regression
Multiple regression is a powerful statistical tool used to examine the relationship between one dependent variable and two or more independent variables. In this context, our dependent variable is the sales at a fast-food outlet, denoted by \(y\). We want to understand how sales are influenced by different factors including the number of competing outlets (\(x_1\)), the population within a certain radius (\(x_2\)), and the presence of a drive-up window (\(x_3\)). The presence of multiple independent variables allows us to gain a more complete picture of the factors influencing sales. By using multiple regression, we can calculate the expected sales by plugging in values for these variables into the given equation:* \[ Y = 10.0 - 1.2x_1 + 6.8x_2 + 15.3x_3 + \varepsilon \]Each coefficient reflects the expected change in sales with a one-unit change in the respective variable, all else being equal.
Indicator Variables
Indicator variables, also known as dummy variables, are used in regression analysis to include categorical data by converting them into a binary format. Here, the indicator variable \(x_3\) is used to represent whether the fast-food outlet has a drive-up window. The variable can take the value of 1 (if the outlet has a drive-up window) or 0 (if it does not). This allows us to quantify the impact of having a drive-up window on sales.
  • If \(x_3 = 1\), the model adds the value of \(15.3\) to the sales prediction.
  • If \(x_3 = 0\), there is no addition to the sales prediction from this variable.
Indicator variables are crucial for including qualitative features into regression analysis and provide insights into how specific attributes can influence the dependent variable.
Mean Value Analysis
The concept of mean value analysis in regression refers to calculating the expected value of the dependent variable by substituting values into our model. This is useful in determining how different levels of the independent variables impact the outcome. In the exercise, we explored two scenarios to compute mean sales values:* For the first scenario, with \(x_1 = 2\), \(x_2 = 8\) (representing 8000 residents), and \(x_3 = 1\), substituting these values gives: \[ Y = 10.0 - 1.2(2) + 6.8(8) + 15.3(1) = 77.3 \] Hence, the mean sales value is estimated at \(77,300.* For the second scenario, \(x_1 = 3\), \(x_2 = 5\) (representing 5000 residents), and \(x_3 = 0\), the calculation becomes: \[ Y = 10.0 - 1.2(3) + 6.8(5) + 15.3(0) = 40.4 \] So, the mean value of sales is \)40,400.By performing mean value analysis, businesses can anticipate the potential impact of various market conditions on sales.
Coefficient Interpretation
In regression analysis, interpreting coefficients is key to understanding the relationship between variables. Each coefficient in the model provides insight into how changes in an individual predictor affect the dependent variable, holding all other factors constant. For instance:
  • \(\beta_1 = -1.2\): Every additional competing outlet decreases sales by \(1,200.
  • \(\beta_2 = 6.8\): For every additional 1,000 people in the vicinity, sales increase by \)6,800.
  • \(\beta_3 = 15.3\): Introducing a drive-up window increases sales by $15,300.
Understanding these coefficients helps stakeholders make informed decisions. Such interpretations lead to strategic planning and resource allocation, ultimately enhancing business effectiveness.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cardiorespiratory fitness is widely recognized as a major component of overall physical well-being. Direct measurement of maximal oxygen uptake \(\left(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max \right)\) is the single best measure of such fitness, but direct measurement is time-consuming and expensive. It is therefore desirable to have a prediction equation for \(\mathrm{VO}_{2}\) max in terms of easily obtained quantities. Consider the variables \(\begin{aligned} y &=\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max (\mathrm{L} / \mathrm{min}) \quad x_{1}=\text { weight }(\mathrm{kg}) \\ x_{2} &=\text { age }(\mathrm{yr}) \\\ x_{3} &=\text { time necessary to walk } 1 \text { mile }(\mathrm{min}) \\\ x_{4} &=\text { heart rate at the end of the walk }(\text { beats } / \mathrm{min}) \end{aligned}\) Here is one possible model, for male students, consistent with the information given in the article "Validation of the Rockport Fitness Walking Test in College Males and Females" (Res. Q. Exercise Sport, 1994: 152–158): $$ \begin{aligned} &Y=5.0+.01 x_{1}-.05 x_{2}-.13 x_{3}-.01 x_{4}+\varepsilon \\ &\sigma=.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Interpret \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{3}\). b. What is the expected value of \(\mathrm{VO}_{2} \max\) when weight is \(76 \mathrm{~kg}\), age is 20 year, walk time is \(12 \mathrm{~min}\), and heart rate is 140 beats \(/ \mathrm{min}\) ? c. What is the probability that \(\mathrm{VO}_{2}\) max will be between \(1.00\) and \(2.60\) for a single observation made when the values of the predictors are as stated in part (b)?

The article "Some Field Experience in the Use of an Accelerated Method in Estimating 28-Day Strength of Concrete" (J. Amer. Concrete Institut., 1969: 895) considered regressing \(y=28\)-day standard-cured strength (psi) against \(x=\) accelerated strength (psi). Suppose the equation of the true regression line is \(y=1800+1.3 x\). a. What is the expected value of 28-day strength when accelerated strength \(=2500\) ? b. By how much can we expect 28-day strength to change when accelerated strength increases by 1 psi? c. Answer part (b) for an increase of \(100 \mathrm{psi}\). d. Answer part (b) for a decrease of 100 psi.

The article "Effects of Bike Lanes on Driver and Bicyclist Behavior" (ASCE Transportation Engrg. J., 1977: 243-256) reports the results of a regression analysis with \(x=\) available travel space in feet (a convenient measure of roadway width, defined as the distance between a cyclist and the roadway center line) and separation distance \(y\) between a bike and a passing car (determined by photography). The data, for ten streets with bike lanes, follows: $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrr} x & 12.8 & 12.9 & 12.9 & 13.6 & 14.5 \\ \hline y & 5.5 & 6.2 & 6.3 & 7.0 & 7.8 \\ x & 14.6 & 15.1 & 17.5 & 19.5 & 20.8 \\ \hline y & 8.3 & 7.1 & 10.0 & 10.8 & 11.0 \end{array} $$ a. Verify that \(\sum x_{i}=154.20, \sum y_{i}=80\), \(\sum x_{i}^{2}=2452.18, \quad \sum x_{i} y_{i}=1282.74, \quad\) and \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=675.16 .\) b. Derive the equation of the estimated regression line. c. What separation distance would you predict for another street that has \(15.0\) as its available travel space value? d. What would be the estimate of expected separation distance for all streets having available travel space value \(15.0\) ?

The article "Increases in Steroid Binding Globulins Induced by Tamoxifen in Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast" \((J\). Endocrinol., 1978: 219-226) reports data on the effects of the drug tamoxifen on change in the level of cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) of patients during treatment. With age \(=x\) and \(\Delta \mathrm{CBG}=y\), summary values are \(n=26, \sum x_{i}=1613, \sum\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}=3756.96\), \(\sum y_{i}=281.9, \quad \sum\left(y_{i}-\bar{y}\right)^{2}=465.34, \quad\) and \(\sum x_{i} y_{i}=16,731\) a. Compute a \(90 \%\) CI for the true correlation coefficient \(\rho\). b. Test \(H_{0}: \rho=-.5\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \rho<-.5\) at level \(.05\). c. In a regression analysis of \(y\) on \(x\), what proportion of variation in change of cortisol-binding globulin level could be explained by variation in patient age within the sample? d. If you decide to perform a regression analysis with age as the dependent variable, what proportion of variation in age is explainable by variation in \(\triangle \mathrm{CBG}\) ?

Utilization of sucrose as a carbon source for the production of chemicals is uneconomical. Beet molasses is a readily available and lowpriced substitute. The article "Optimization of the Production of \(\beta\)-Carotene from Molasses by Blakeslea trispora" \((J .\) Chem. Tech. Biotech., 2002: 933-943) carried out a multiple regression analysis to relate the dependent variable \(y=\) amount of \(\beta\)-carotene \(\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{dm}^{3}\right)\) to the three predictors: amount of linoleic acid, amount of kerosene, and amount of antioxidant (all \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{dm}^{3}\) ). a. Fitting the complete second-order model in the three predictors resulted in \(R^{2}=.987\) and adjusted \(R^{2}=974\), whereas fitting the first-order model gave \(R^{2}=.016\). What would you conclude about the two models? b. For \(x_{1}=x_{2}=30, x_{3}=10\), a statistical software package reported that \(\hat{y}=.66573, s_{\hat{Y}}=.01785\) based on the complete second-order model. Predict the amount of \(\beta\)-carotene that would result from a single experimental run with the designated values of the independent variables, and do so in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. $$ \begin{array}{lccrc} \hline \text { Obs } & \text { Linoleic } & \text { Kerosene } & \text { Antiox } & \text { Betacaro } \\ \hline 1 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.7000 \\ 2 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.6300 \\ 3 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 18.41 & 0.0130 \\ 4 & 40.00 & 40.00 & 5.00 & 0.0490 \\ 5 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.7000 \\ 6 & 13.18 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.1000 \\ 7 & 20.00 & 40.00 & 5.00 & 0.0400 \\ 8 & 20.00 & 40.00 & 15.00 & 0.0065 \\ 9 & 40.00 & 20.00 & 5.00 & 0.2020 \\ 10 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.6300 \\ 11 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 1.59 & 0.0400 \\ 12 & 40.00 & 20.00 & 15.00 & 0.1320 \\ 13 & 40.00 & 40.00 & 15.00 & 0.1500 \\ 14 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.7000 \\ 15 & 30.00 & 46.82 & 10.00 & 0.3460 \\ 16 & 30.00 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.6300 \\ 17 & 30.00 & 13.18 & 10.00 & 0.3970 \\ 18 & 20.00 & 20.00 & 5.00 & 0.2690 \\ 19 & 20.00 & 20.00 & 15.00 & 0.0054 \\ 20 & 46.82 & 30.00 & 10.00 & 0.0640 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.