/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 Suppose \(\lambda\) denotes Lebe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose \(\lambda\) denotes Lebesgue measure on \((\mathbf{R}, \mathcal{L}),\) where \(\mathcal{L}\) is the \(\sigma\) -algebra of Lebesgue measurable subsets of \(\mathbf{R}\). Show that there exist subsets \(E\) and \(F\) of \(\mathbf{R}^{2}\) such that \- \(\quad F \in \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}\) and \((\lambda \times \lambda)(F)=0\) \(E \subset F\) but \(E \notin \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}\) [The measure space \((\mathbf{R}, \mathcal{L}, \lambda)\) has the property that every subset of a set with measure 0 is measurable. This exercise asks you to show that the measure space \(\left(\mathbf{R}^{2}, \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}, \lambda \times \lambda\right)\) does not have this property. \(]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
We have constructed subsets E and F of \(\mathbf{R}^2\) such that F is a measurable set with measure 0, as it is a subset of the unit square \([0, 1] \times [0, 1]\) containing the non-measurable Vitali set V along both coordinates. E is a subset of F but is non-measurable, as it consists of all points on the diagonal of the unit square that belong to the set F. This satisfies the conditions of the exercise, showing that the measure space \(\left(\mathbf{R}^{2}, \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}, \lambda \times \lambda\right)\) does not have the property that every subset of a set with measure 0 is measurable.

Step by step solution

01

Constructing a non-measurable set in R

: Let us consider the Vitali set V, which is a subset of the unit interval [0, 1]. V is a non-measurable set, meaning that it doesn't belong to the sigma-algebra of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R, i.e., V \(\notin \mathcal{L}\).
02

Constructing F in R^2

: To construct the set F in \(\mathbf{R}^2\), let's consider the set \(Q = \{(x, y) \in \mathbf{R}^2 : x, y \in V\}\), where V is the non-measurable Vitali set from Step 1. Since V is a subset of the unit interval [0, 1], the set Q is a subset of the unit square \([0, 1] \times [0, 1]\), i.e., \(Q \subseteq [0, 1] \times [0, 1]\). Now, we can observe that every horizontal and vertical line in \([0, 1] \times [0, 1]\) intersects the set Q, as Q contains a copy of the non-measurable Vitali set V along both coordinates. As a result, the Lebesgue measure of Q is 0, i.e., \(\lambda(Q) = 0\). This means that \(Q \in \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}\) and \((\lambda \times \lambda)(Q) = 0\). Thus, we can take the set F as Q.
03

Constructing E in R^2

: Now, let's consider the set \(E = \{(x, y) \in Q : x = y\}\), i.e., the set of all points on the diagonal of the unit square \([0, 1] \times [0, 1]\) that belong to the set Q. Since Q ⊆ [0, 1] × [0, 1], we have E ⊆ Q = F. However, due to the non-measurability of the Vitali set V, the set E is not measurable, i.e., \(E \notin \mathcal{L} \otimes \mathcal{L}\). In conclusion, we have constructed subsets E and F of \(\mathbf{R}^2\) such that F is a measurable set with measure 0, E is a subset of F but is non-measurable, which satisfies the conditions of the exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

non-measurable set
In mathematics, a **non-measurable set** is a set that defies the idea of measure within the Lebesgue framework. Lebesgue measure is a tool used to analyze sizes of sets in a space more flexibly and accurately than traditional methods. However, some sets do not fit within this framework because they cannot be neatly assigned a Lebesgue measure.

To illustrate, consider the Vitali set, which is a famous example often used in discussions about non-measurable sets. This set illustrates the complexities of measure theory by showing how certain sets, despite living within a measurable space like the real numbers, cannot be measured in the classical sense.

Let's break down what makes a set non-measurable:
  • It does not belong to the sigma-algebra of Lebesgue measurable subsets, meaning it cannot be constructed from countable operations of measurable sets.
  • Such sets challenge the notion that any set of real numbers can have a well-defined size. They are crucial in understanding the boundaries of measure theory.
As a result, non-measurable sets show that even sophisticated mathematical theories have limitations and need careful handling.
Vitali set
The **Vitali set** is a particular subset of the real numbers that is crucial in understanding non-measurability. Named after the Italian mathematician Giuseppe Vitali, this set challenges the assumption that every subset of real numbers can be measured with a well-defined value. Here’s why the Vitali set is so intriguing:

- To create a Vitali set, take the unit interval \([0, 1]\) and consider the relation between numbers modulo 1 (i.e., the fractional part of a number). Choose one representative from each equivalence class of numbers when considering their differences are rational numbers.- By selecting these representatives, you form the Vitali set, which is constructed in a way that it includes one member from each group of numbers differing by a rational number.- This construction means that if the Vitali set were measurable, it would simultaneously have a measure of 0 and a positive measure, which is impossible.

Thus, the Vitali set cannot be assigned a Lebesgue measure, making it non-measurable. It demonstrates how specific constructions in measure theory can lead to results that defy intuition. Understanding the Vitali set shows the limitations of extending the power of measure in mathematics.
sigma-algebra
A **sigma-algebra** is a fundamental concept in measure theory, providing a structured way to handle collections of sets in a consistent manner. It’s like a toolbox that helps mathematicians deal with sets in a systematic way. Unlike ordinary collections, a sigma-algebra must satisfy specific properties that facilitate working with measures.

The principle elements that characterize a sigma-algebra include:
  • **Closed under complementation**: If a set is in the sigma-algebra, then its complement must also be included.
  • **Closed under countable unions**: If you have an infinite sequence of sets that belong to the sigma-algebra, their union also belongs.
  • Contains the universal set and the empty set.
This structure ensures that we can define and work with measures, like the Lebesgue measure, on a wide variety of sets systematically. Without a sigma-algebra, it would be nearly impossible to perform consistent operations that are crucial for analysis, such as integration.

The concept of sigma-algebra is key in ensuring we can measure sets accurately, and it helps us understand when certain sets, like the Vitali set, are not measurable. By learning about sigma-algebras, students can grasp the intricate framework needed for rigorous analysis in mathematical spaces.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.