/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 85 If \(A\) and \(B\) are independe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If \(A\) and \(B\) are independent events, show that \(A\) and \(\bar{B}\) are also independent. Are \(\bar{A}\) and \(\bar{B}\) independent?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, both \(A\) and \(\bar{B}\), and \(\bar{A}\) and \(\bar{B}\) are independent.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Independence

Two events, say A and B, are independent if the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other. Mathematically, events A and B are independent if \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B) \). This is the condition we need to verify for \( A \) and \( \bar{B} \), and also for \( \bar{A} \) and \( \bar{B} \).
02

Defining Complementary Events for B

For any event B, the complement \( \bar{B} \) occurs when B does not occur. The probability of \( \bar{B} \) is given by \( P(\bar{B}) = 1 - P(B) \). This means that we want to check if \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) = P(A) \cdot (1 - P(B)) \).
03

Using Probability Rules to Find \(P(A \cap \bar{B})\)

Since \( A \) and \( B \) are independent, \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B) \). Also, \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) + P(A \cap B) = P(A) \) because these two events are complementary with respect to A. We can express \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) \) as \( P(A) - P(A \cap B) \).
04

Calculating \(P(A \cap \bar{B})\)

Substituting \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B) \) into the expression for \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) \), we get: \[ P(A \cap \bar{B}) = P(A) - P(A) \cdot P(B) = P(A) (1 - P(B)) \]. This shows that \( A \) and \( \bar{B} \) are independent because \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) = P(A) \cdot P(\bar{B}) \).
05

Defining Complementary Events for A

Investigate the independence of \( \bar{A} \) and \( \bar{B} \) by using their complements: \( P(\bar{A} \cap \bar{B}) = 1 - P(A \cup B) \). With \( P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) \) and using independence, \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) P(B) \).
06

Checking Independence for \(\bar{A}\) and \(\bar{B}\)

Calculate \( P(\bar{A} \cap \bar{B}) \) as follows: \[ P(\bar{A} \cap \bar{B}) = 1 - (P(A) + P(B) - P(A)P(B)) \]. Let's simplify: \[ P(\bar{A} \cap \bar{B}) = 1 - P(A) - P(B) + P(A)P(B) \]. Compare \( P(\bar{A})P(\bar{B}) \) which is \((1 - P(A))(1 - P(B)) = 1 - P(A) - P(B) + P(A)P(B) \). This confirms \( \bar{A} \) and \( \bar{B} \) are also independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Complementary Events
When exploring probability, complementary events play a crucial role. Let's consider an event, say "B." Its complementary event, denoted as \(\bar{B}\), is the event that "B" does not occur. The probability of a complementary event is found by subtracting the probability of the original event from one. In mathematical terms, \(P(\bar{B}) = 1 - P(B)\). This equation simply expresses that either the event occurs, or it does not—a foundational concept in probability.
This definition becomes especially useful when analyzing independent events. If two events, like "A" and "B" in this exercise, are independent, then calculating the probability of "A" and \(\bar{B}\) together requires understanding these complementary principles. They help us extend our analysis from original pairs of events to the complements of those events effortlessly.
Probability Rules
In probability, certain rules help establish relationships between events and their probabilities. One key probability rule is for independent events, where the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of another event. Mathematically, for two independent events "A" and "B", the relationship is expressed as \( P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B) \).
Applying this knowledge, the probability for the joint occurrence of "A" and \(\bar{B}\)—the complement of "B"—should adjust to reflect these independence concepts. This means we reformulate the probability to fit the complementary event: \(P(A \cap \bar{B}) = P(A) \cdot (1 - P(B))\). This calculation maintains the independence established between "A" and "B" even when one of the events is replaced by its complement, showcasing the flexibility and consistency of probability rules.
Mathematical Proof
Developing a mathematical proof involves logical reasoning, expressed through equations and derived results. In this case, we explore the proof by applying known probability rules and complementary event principles.
First, we validate the rule for "A" and \(\bar{B}\). Using known independence of "A" and "B", we find \( P(A \cap \bar{B}) = P(A) (1 - P(B))\), matching \(P(A) \cdot P(\bar{B})\). Checking this confirms "A" and \(\bar{B}\) are independent.
Next, explore "\bar{A}" and "\bar{B}". Starting with \(P(\bar{A}\cap\bar{B}) = 1 - (P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B))\), applying \(P(A \cap B)=P(A)P(B)\), simplifies it to \(1 - P(A) - P(B) + P(A)P(B)\). Notice this equals \((1-P(A))(1-P(B))\), proving independence for "\bar{A}" and "\bar{B}". This step-by-step logical progression highlights the elegance and rigor of mathematical proof.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How many different seven-digit telephone numbers can be formed if the first digit cannot be zero?

Articles coming through an inspection line are visually inspected by two successive inspectors. When a defective article comes through the inspection line, the probability that it gets by the first inspector is .1. The second inspector will "miss" five out of ten of the defective items that get past the first inspector. What is the probability that a defective item gets by both inspectors?

Five firms, \(F_{1}, F_{2}, \ldots, F_{5},\) each offer bids on three separate contracts, \(C_{1}, C_{2},\) and \(C_{3} .\) Any one firm will be awarded at most one contract. The contracts are quite different, so an assignment of \(C_{1}\) to \(F_{1},\) say, is to be distinguished from an assignment of \(C_{2}\) to \(F_{1}\). a. How many sample points are there altogether in this experiment involving assignment of contracts to the firms? (No need to list them all.) b. Under the assumption of equally likely sample points, find the probability that \(F_{3}\) is awarded a contract.

A policy requiring all hospital employees to take lie detector tests may reduce losses due to theft, but some employees regard such tests as a violation of their rights. Past experience indicates that lie detectors have accuracy rates that vary from \(92 \%\) to \(99 \% .^{\star}\) To gain some insight into the risks that employees face when taking a lie detector test, suppose that the probability is .05 that a lie detector concludes that a person is lying who, in fact, is telling the truth and suppose that any pair of tests are independent. What is the probability that a machine will conclude that a. each of three employees is lying when all are telling the truth? b. at least one of the three employees is lying when all are telling the truth?

The eight-member Human Relations Advisory Board of Gainesville, Florida, considered the complaint of a woman who claimed discrimination, based on sex, on the part of a local company. The board, composed of five women and three men, voted \(5-3\) in favor of the plaintiff, the five women voting in favor of the plaintiff, the three men against. The attorney representing the company appealed the board's decision by claiming sex bias on the part of the board members. If there was no sex bias among the board members, it might be reasonable to conjecture that any group of five board members would be as likely to vote for the complainant as any other group of five. If this were the case, what is the probability that the vote would split along sex lines (five women for, three men against)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.