/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Compared to their stay-at-home p... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Compared to their stay-at-home peers, women employed outside the home have higher levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL), the "good" cholesterol associated with lower risk for heart attacks. A study of cholesterol levels in 2000 women, aged \(25-64\), living in Augsburg, Germany, was conducted by Ursula Haertel, Ulrigh Keil, and colleagues \(^{\star}\) at the GSF-Medis Institut in Munich. Of these 2000 women, the \(48 \%\) who worked outside the home had HDL levels that were between 2.5 and 3.6 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) higher than the HDL levels of their stay-at-home counterparts. Suppose that the difference in HDL levels is normally distributed, with mean 0 (indicating no difference between the two groups of women) and standard deviation \(1.2 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\). If you were to select an employed woman and a stay-at-home counterpart at random, what is the probability that the difference in their HDL levels would be between 1.2 and \(2.4 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability is approximately 13.59%.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to find the probability of the difference in HDL levels between employed women and stay-at-home women, which is normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.2 mg/dL, being between 1.2 and 2.4 mg/dL.
02

Standardize the Range

To calculate probabilities for a normal distribution, we first convert the HDL difference range (1.2 to 2.4 mg/dL) to standard normal variable (z-scores). Use the formula for z-score: \( z = \frac{(X - \mu)}{\sigma} \). Given \( \mu = 0 \) and \( \sigma = 1.2 \), compute the z-scores for 1.2 and 2.4.
03

Calculate Z-scores

Convert the range limits to z-scores: - Lower limit: \( z = \frac{(1.2 - 0)}{1.2} = 1.0 \)- Upper limit: \( z = \frac{(2.4 - 0)}{1.2} = 2.0 \). These z-scores help in looking up probabilities in the standard normal distribution table.
04

Find Probabilities from Standard Normal Table

Look up the cumulative probabilities for \( z = 1.0 \) and \( z = 2.0 \):- Probability for \( z = 1.0 \) is approximately 0.8413- Probability for \( z = 2.0 \) is approximately 0.9772.
05

Calculate the Desired Probability

Subtract the cumulative probability at \( z = 1.0 \) from the cumulative probability at \( z = 2.0 \): \[ P(1.2 < X < 2.4) = P(Z < 2.0) - P(Z < 1.0) = 0.9772 - 0.8413 = 0.1359 \].
06

Final Result

The probability that the difference in HDL levels is between 1.2 and 2.4 mg/dL is 0.1359, or approximately 13.59%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Z-score
A Z-score tells us how many standard deviations away a data point is from the mean of a distribution. It helps in standardizing different data points on the same scale. By converting raw scores into Z-scores, we can easily determine their position in the normal distribution. For this exercise, we're given that the mean difference in HDL levels between employed and stay-at-home women is 0, with a standard deviation of 1.2 mg/dL.
To compute a Z-score, use the formula: \( z = \frac{(X - \mu)}{\sigma} \).
  • Lower limit: For an HDL difference of 1.2 mg/dL, the Z-score calculation is \( z = \frac{(1.2 - 0)}{1.2} = 1.0 \).
  • Upper limit: For an HDL difference of 2.4 mg/dL, you calculate \( z = \frac{(2.4 - 0)}{1.2} = 2.0 \).
These Z-scores allow us to use the standard normal distribution table to find probabilities. They provide a straightforward way to interpret where the values lie in the distribution.
Cumulative Probability
Cumulative probability refers to the likelihood that a random variable is less than or equal to a specific value. In the context of a normal distribution, it's the integral of the probability density function (PDF) from negative infinity up to a specific value. Finding the cumulative probability involves looking up a value in the standard normal distribution table using a Z-score.
For this exercise, we use cumulative probability to find the likelihood that the HDL level difference falls within a specified range.
  • The cumulative probability for Z = 1.0 is indicated as 0.8413, which represents the probability that a value is less than 1.0 standard deviations from the mean.
  • For Z = 2.0, the cumulative probability is approximately 0.9772, indicating a higher likelihood of being less than 2.0 standard deviations.
To find the probability of the HDL level difference being between 1.2 mg/dL and 2.4 mg/dL, we subtract the cumulative probability at Z = 1.0 from the cumulative probability at Z = 2.0, yielding the desired probability—approximately 13.59%.
Standard Normal Table
The standard normal table, also known as the Z-table, is a handy tool that provides the cumulative probability associated with each Z-score in a standard normal distribution. The table essentially maps Z-scores to cumulative probabilities, which indicate the probability of a standard normal variable falling below the given Z-score.
  • In our example problem, after calculating the Z-scores (1.0 and 2.0) for the specified HDL difference range, we refer to the standard normal table.
  • At Z = 1.0, the table provides the cumulative probability of 0.8413, while for Z = 2.0, it gives 0.9772.
Using these cumulative probabilities, we determine the specific probability of the HDL level difference falling between the calculated Z-scores. This table is crucial for understanding the spread of data in a normal distribution, enabling efficient probability calculation without needing complex mathematical functions every time.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A pharmaceutical company wants to know whether an experimental drug has an effect on systolic blood pressure. Fifteen randomly selected subjects were given the drug and, after sufficient time for the drug to have an impact, their systolic blood pressures were recorded. The data appear below:$$\begin{array}{lllll} 172 & 140 & 123 & 130 & 115 \\ 148 & 108 & 129 & 137 & 161 \\ 123 & 152 & 133 & 128 & 142 \end{array}$$ a. Approximate the value of \(s\) using the range approximation. b. Calculate the values of \(\bar{y}\) and \(s\) for the 15 blood pressure readings. c. Use Tchebysheff's theorem (Exercise 1.32 ) to find values \(a\) and \(b\) such that at least \(75 \%\) of the blood pressure measurements lie between \(a\) and \(b\) d. Did Tchebysheff's theorem work? That is, use the data to find the actual percent of blood pressure readings that are between the values \(a\) and \(b\) you found in part (c). Is this actual percentage greater than \(75 \%\) ?

Resting breathing rates for college-age students are approximately normally distributed with mean 12 and standard deviation 2.3 breaths per minute. What fraction of all college-age students have breathing rates in the following intervals? a. 9.7 to 14.3 breaths per minute b. 7.4 to 16.6 breaths per minute c. 9.7 to 16.6 breaths per minute d. Less than 5.1 or more than 18.9 breaths per minute

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, chloroform, which in its gaseous form is suspected to be a cancer-causing agent, is present in small quantities in all the country's 240,000 public water sources. If the mean and standard deviation of the amounts of chloroform present in water sources are 34 and 53 micrograms per liter \((\mu g / \mathrm{L})\), respectively, explain why chloroform amounts do not have a normal distribution.

A random sample of 100 foxes was examined by a team of veterinarians to determine the prevalence of a specific parasite. Counting the number of parasites of this specific type, the veterinarians found that 69 foxes had no parasites of the type of interest, 17 had one parasite of the type under study, and so on. A summary of their results is given in the following table: $$\begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} \text { Number of Parasites } & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Number of Foxes } & 69 & 17 & 6 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. Construct the relative frequency histogram for the number of parasites per fox. b. Calculate \(\bar{g}\) and \(s\) for the data given. c. What fraction of the parasite counts falls within 2 standard deviations of the mean? Within 3 standard deviations? Do your results agree with Tchebysheff's theorem (Exercise 1.32 ) and/or the empirical rule?

The manufacturer of a new food additive for beef cattle claims that \(80 \%\) of the animals fed a diet including this additive should have monthly weight gains in excess of 20 pounds. A large sample of measurements on weight gains for cattle fed this diet exhibits an approximately normal distribution with mean 22 pounds and standard deviation 2 pounds. Do you think the sample information contradicts the manufacturer's claim? (Calculate the probability of a weight gain exceeding 20 pounds.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.