/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 (a) Give an example that shows t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) Give an example that shows that the sum of two irrational numbers can be a rational number. (b) Now explain why the following proof that \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is an irrational number is not a valid proof: Since \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{5}\) are both irrational numbers, their sum is an irrational number. Therefore, \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is an irrational number. Note: You may even assume that we have proven that \(\sqrt{5}\) is an irrational number. (We have not proven this.) (c) Is the real number \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) a rational number or an irrational number? Justify your conclusion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) An example of the sum of two irrational numbers being a rational number is \( \sqrt{2} + (-\sqrt{2}) = 0 \), where 0 is a rational number. (b) The given proof is not valid because it doesn't provide a rigorous justification and, as shown in part (a), the sum of two irrational numbers can indeed be rational. (c) The real number \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is an irrational number because assuming it to be rational leads to a contradiction, as shown in the detailed proof.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Example of sum of two irrational numbers being a rational number.

Let's consider two irrational numbers, \( \sqrt{2} \) and \( -\sqrt{2} \). Their sum is: \[ \sqrt{2} + (-\sqrt{2}) = \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{2} = 0 \] Since 0 is a rational number, we found an example where the sum of two irrational numbers results in a rational number.
02

(b) Explain why the given proof is not valid.

The given proof argues that since \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{5}\) are both irrational numbers, their sum must be an irrational number. However, this argument doesn't provide any rigorous justification. As shown in part (a), it's not always true that the sum of two irrational numbers is irrational.
03

(c) Determine if \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is rational or irrational.

To answer this question, we will assume that \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is rational and try to find a contradiction, which would prove that it is actually irrational. Suppose that \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is a rational number, then it can be expressed as a fraction \(\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are integers with no common factors other than 1 (i.e., they are coprime) and \(q\) is nonzero. Then we could write: \[ \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{5} = \frac{p}{q} \] Now, let's square both sides of the equation: \begin{align*} (\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{5})^2 &= (\frac{p}{q})^2 \\ (2 + 2\sqrt{2}\sqrt{5} + 5) &= \frac{p^2}{q^2} \end{align*} Simplify the left side of the equation: \[7 + 2\sqrt{10} = \frac{p^2}{q^2} \] Notice that the right side of the equation is a rational number (as the squares of an integer divided by the square of another integer is still a fraction). In order to maintain equality, the left side must also simplify to a rational number. However, the left side consists of the sum of two terms, \(7\) which is rational, and \(2\sqrt{10}\) which is irrational. This implies that the equation: \[7 + 2\sqrt{10} = \frac{p^2}{q^2} \] cannot be true, because the sum of a rational number and an irrational number must be irrational. Thus, our initial assumption that \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is rational leads to a contradiction. Therefore, \((\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5})\) is, in fact, an irrational number.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rational and Irrational Numbers
Understanding the difference between rational and irrational numbers is foundational in mathematics. A rational number is any number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction \frac{p}{q} of two integers, where the numerator p is an integer, and the denominator q is a non-zero integer. Familiar examples include \frac{1}{2}, \frac{4}{3}, and -\frac{5}{1}, which can also be represented as decimal numbers that either terminate or repeat.

Conversely, an irrational number cannot be expressed as a simple fraction. This means that its decimal representation does not terminate or repeat; it goes on forever without a repeating pattern. Classic examples are \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\pi\), which continue infinitely without repetition. One significant property to remember is that the sum or product of a rational and an irrational number is always irrational, which partly arises from the definition of irrational numbers not being representable as fractions or repeating decimals.
Proof By Contradiction
The method of proof by contradiction is a powerful tool in mathematics used to establish the truth of a statement. This type of proof starts by assuming the opposite of what you want to prove. If this assumption leads to an absurdity or a logical contradiction, then the initial assumption must have been false, confirming that the original statement is true.

This technique is particularly useful in proofs involving irrational numbers. As indicated in the exercise, assuming that \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) is rational creates a contradiction since it would imply the sum of a rational and an irrational number is rational, which violates the fundamental properties of these types of numbers. This contradiction confirms that our assumption is false and hence, the original proposition that \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) is irrational is corroborated.
Properties of Square Roots
Properties of square roots are essential to understanding why certain numbers are irrational. A square root of a number x is a number that, when multiplied by itself, gives x. For example, the square root of 4 is 2, because \(2 \times 2 = 4\). However, not all square roots are as straightforward.

When Is a Square Root Irrational?

When you take the square root of a nonsquare natural number—meaning the number cannot be expressed as the square of an integer—the result is usually an irrational number. This is the case with numbers such as \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{5}\), which do not produce a tidy integer upon extraction of the root. When you add two square roots of nonsquare numbers, like in the textbook exercise \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\), the properties of square roots generally suggest that the result will often be irrational, although this isn't always enough to prove it without additional reasoning, such as proof by contradiction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove the following proposition: Let \(a\) be an integer. If there exists an integer \(n\) such that \(a \mid(4 n+3)\) and \(a \mid(2 n+1),\) then \(a=1\) or \(a=-1\).

Evaluation of proofs This type of exercise will appear frequently in the book. In each case, there is a proposed proof of a proposition. However, the proposition may be true or may be false. \- If a proposition is false, the proposed proof is, of course, incorrect. In this situation, you are to find the error in the proof and then provide a counterexample showing that the proposition is false. \- If a proposition is true, the proposed proof may still be incorrect. In this case, you are to determine why the proof is incorrect and then write a correct proof using the writing guidelines that have been presented in this book. \- If a proposition is true and the proof is correct, you are to decide if the proof is well written or not. If it is well written, then you simply must indicate that this is an excellent proof and needs no revision. On the other hand, if the proof is not well written, then you must then revise the proof by writing it according to the guidelines presented in this text.(a) Proposition. If \(m\) is an even integer, then \((5 m+4)\) is an even integer. \mathrm{\\{} \text { Proof. We see that } 5 m + 4 = 1 0 n + 4 \(=2(5 n+2)\). Therefore, \((5 m+4)\) is an even integer. (b) Proposition. For all real numbers \(x\) and \(y,\) if \(x \neq y, x>0,\) and \(y>0,\) then \(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}>2\) \mathrm{\\{} P r o o f . ~ S i n c e ~ \(x\) and \(y\) are positive real numbers, \(x y\) is positive and we can multiply both sides of the inequality by \(x y\) to obtain $$ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}\right) \cdot x y &>2 \cdot x y \\ x^{2}+y^{2} &>2 x y \end{aligned} $$ By combining all terms on the left side of the inequality, we see that \(x^{2}-2 x y+y^{2}>0\) and then by factoring the left side, we obtain \((x-y)^{2}>0 .\) Since \(x \neq y,(x-y) \neq 0\) and so \((x-y)^{2}>0 .\) This proves that if \(x \neq y, x>0,\) and \(y>0,\) then \(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}>2\) (c) Proposition. For all integers \(a, b,\) and \(c,\) if \(a \mid(b c),\) then \(a \mid b\) or \(a \mid c\). \mathrm{\\{} P r o o f . ~ W e ~ a s s u m e ~ t h a t ~ \(a, b,\) and \(c\) are integers and that \(a\) divides \(b c\). So, there exists an integer \(k\) such that \(b c=k a\). We now factor \(k\) as \(k=m n,\) where \(m\) and \(n\) are integers. We then see that $$ b c=m n a . $$ This means that \(b=m a\) or \(c=n a\) and hence, \(a \mid b\) or \(a \mid c\). (d) Proposition. For all positive integers \(a, b,\) and \(c,\left(a^{b}\right)^{c}=a^{\left(b^{c}\right)}\). This proposition is false as is shown by the following counterexample: If we let \(a=2, b=3,\) and \(c=2,\) then $$ \begin{aligned} \left(a^{b}\right)^{c} &=a^{\left(b^{c}\right)} \\ \left(2^{3}\right)^{2} &=2^{\left(3^{2}\right)} \\ 8^{2} &=2^{9} \\ 64 & \neq 512 \end{aligned} $$

See the instructions for Exercise (19) on page 100 from Section 3.1 . (a) For each real number \(x,\) if \(x\) is irrational and \(m\) is an integer, then \(m x\) is irrational. \mathrm{Proof. We assume that } x \text { is a real number and is irrational. This means } that for all integers \(a\) and \(b\) with \(b \neq 0, x \neq \frac{a}{b} .\) Hence, we may conclude that \(m x \neq \frac{m a}{h}\) and, therefore, \(m x\) is irrational. (b)For all real numbers \(x\) and \(y,\) if \(x\) is irrational and \(y\) is rational, then \(x+y\) is irrational. Proof. We will use a proof by contradiction. So we assume that the proposition is false, which means that there exist real numbers \(x\) and \(y\) where \(x \notin \mathbb{Q}, y \in \mathbb{Q},\) and \(x+y \in \mathbb{Q} .\) Since the rational numbers are closed under subtraction and \(x+y\) and \(y\) are rational, we see that $$ (x+y)-y \in \mathbb{Q} $$ However, \((x+y)-y=x,\) and hence we can conclude that \(x \in \mathbb{Q}\). This is a contradiction to the assumption that \(x \notin \mathbb{Q}\). Therefore, the proposition is not false, and we have proven that for all real numbers \(x\) and \(y,\) if \(x\) is irrational and \(y\) is rational, then \(x+y\) is irrational. (c) Proposition. For each real number \(x, x(1-x) \leq \frac{1}{4}\). \mathrm{Proof. A proof by contradiction will be used. So we assume the propo- } sition is false. This means that there exists a real number \(x\) such that \(x(1-x)>\frac{1}{4} .\) If we multiply both sides of this inequality by \(4,\) we obtain \(4 x(1-x)>1\). However, if we let \(x=3,\) we then see that $$ \begin{array}{r} 4 x(1-x)>1 \\ 4 \cdot 3(1-3)>1 \\ -12>1 \end{array} $$ The last inequality is clearly a contradiction and so we have proved the proposition.

Consider the following statement: For each positive real number \(r,\) if \(r^{2}=18,\) then \(r\) is irrational. (a) If you were setting up a proof by contradiction for this statement, what would you assume? Carefully write down all conditions that you would assume. (b) Complete a proof by contradiction for this statement.

(a) Write the contrapositive of the following statement: For all positive real numbers \(a\) and \(b\), if \(\sqrt{a b} \neq \frac{a+b}{2},\) then \(a \neq b\). (b) Is this statement true or false? Prove the statement if it is true or provide a counterexample if it is false.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.