/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Prove the following proposition:... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prove the following proposition: For all integers \(a\) and \(b\), if 3 divides \(\left(a^{2}+b^{2}\right)\), then 3 divides \(a\) and 3 divides \(b\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
We can prove the given proposition using modular arithmetic and considering the possible remainders of \(a\) and \(b\) when divided by 3. The only case satisfying the condition that 3 divides \(\left(a^{2}+b^{2}\right)\) is when both \(a\) and \(b\) have a remainder of 0 when divided by 3, indicating that 3 divides both \(a\) and \(b\).

Step by step solution

01

Recall the definition of divisibility

Recall that if an integer \(n\) divides another integer \(m\), denoted as \(n|m\), there exists an integer \(k\) such that \(nk = m\). In this exercise, we have that 3 divides \(\left(a^{2}+b^{2}\right)\), so we can write 3k = \(a^2 + b^2\) for some integer \(k\).
02

Investigate possible cases for a and b

There are three possible cases of remainders when dividing an integer by 3, which are 0, 1, and 2. We will use modular arithmetic to analyze the remainders of \(a^2\) and \(b^2\) for each case.
03

Analyze the case where the remainders are 0

If both \(a\) and \(b\) have a remainder of 0 when divided by 3, i.e., \(a\equiv 0\pmod{3}\) and \(b\equiv 0\pmod{3}\), then both of them are divisible by 3 and the proposition is true in this case.
04

Analyze the case where the remainders are 1

Consider the case where \(a\equiv 1\pmod{3}\) and \(b\equiv 1\pmod{3}\). It follows that \(a^2 \equiv 1^2 \equiv 1\pmod{3}\) and \(b^2 \equiv 1^2 \equiv 1 \pmod{3}\). Therefore, \(a^2 + b^2 \equiv 1 + 1 \equiv 2\pmod{3}\). In this case, \(a^2+b^2\) is not divisible by 3, which means this case does not satisfy the given condition.
05

Analyze the case where the remainders are 2

Consider the case where \(a\equiv 2\pmod{3}\) and \(b\equiv 2\pmod{3}\). It follows that \(a^2 \equiv 2^2 \equiv 4 \equiv 1 \pmod{3}\) and \(b^2 \equiv 2^2 \equiv 4 \equiv 1\pmod{3}\). Therefore, \(a^2 + b^2 \equiv 1 + 1 \equiv 2\pmod{3}\). In this case, \(a^2+b^2\) is not divisible by 3, which means this case also does not satisfy the given condition.
06

Conclusion

From the analysis above, we observe that the only possible case satisfying the given condition, i.e., 3 divides \(\left(a^{2}+b^{2}\right)\), is when both \(a\) and \(b\) have a remainder of 0 when divided by 3. In other words, when 3 divides both \(a\) and \(b\). Therefore, we can conclude that the given proposition is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Modular Arithmetic
Modular arithmetic, a cornerstone of number theory, can feel perplexing at first, but it is, at its core, an elegant way to handle the remainders of division problems. At its simplest, it involves computing the remainder when one number is divided by another—termed the modulus. The term 'modulus' here is the divisor, which is 3 in the case of our exercise.

Imagine a clock with only three hours: any time beyond 3 o’clock loops back to the beginning. Similarly, in modular arithmetic, once we reach our modulus (which is like '3 o'clock'), we wrap around. For example, 4 modulo 3 would bring us back to 1, since 3 goes into 4 one time with a remainder of 1. Understanding this 'wrap around' or cyclic nature is key.

When embarking on proving statements that involve divisibility, modular arithmetic proves its might. It allows careful inspection of the possible remainders an integer could have when divided by another specific integer, neatly outlining the possible 'clock positions'. For instance, in the exercise provided, by considering the squares of integers modulo 3, we rigorously dissect all options and discard those that don't satisfy the required divisibility condition. This is how we confirmed that if the sum of two squares is divisible by 3, the individual numbers themselves must be as well.
Mathematical Proof
Mathematical proofs are the bedrock of certainty in mathematics, irrefutably establishing the truth of propositions through logic. In the problem at hand, we aim to prove a statement regarding divisibility. A proof, in essence, ensures that for every case conceivable within the bounds of the proposition's conditions, the statement holds water.

Through a series of steps, we begin by clarifying our definitions. Next, we set forth all conceivable scenarios—does movement through our 'three-hour clock' yield different results for squares of numbers? After exploring and dismissing incompatible cases with modular arithmetic, we arrive at the only possibility consistent with the premise. This approach not only asserts the truth of the proposition but does so with the rigor and comprehensibility that's vital in mathematical argumentation. In education, demonstrating this process is as crucial as the result itself, as it illuminates the path from hypothesis to conclusion.
Integer Division Properties
Diving into integer division properties can feel akin to uncovering the rules of a hidden mathematical game. Understanding these properties can empower you to unravel complex divisibility puzzles. When an integer divides another, like 3 dividing \(a^2 + b^2\), it means that the result of the division is itself an integer—there's no fractional part left hanging. This is encapsulated in the definition of divisibility: for integers \(n\) and \(m\), if \(n|m\), then \(m\) is \(n\) times some integer \(k\).

Grasping how division and multiplication are intertwined helps us navigate through problems that involve identifying divisors or proving divisibility. For instance, our initial exercise requires us to consider not only the direct division of \(a\) and \(b\) by 3 but also the implications of their squares being divisible. These properties never falter, functioning as the steadfast axioms upon which entire edifices of mathematical proofs are constructed. It is through the masterful use of division properties, combined with modular arithmetic, that mathematical proofs reveal their compelling power.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluation of proofs This type of exercise will appear frequently in the book. In each case, there is a proposed proof of a proposition. However, the proposition may be true or may be false. \- If a proposition is false, the proposed proof is, of course, incorrect. In this situation, you are to find the error in the proof and then provide a counterexample showing that the proposition is false. \- If a proposition is true, the proposed proof may still be incorrect. In this case, you are to determine why the proof is incorrect and then write a correct proof using the writing guidelines that have been presented in this book. \- If a proposition is true and the proof is correct, you are to decide if the proof is well written or not. If it is well written, then you simply must indicate that this is an excellent proof and needs no revision. On the other hand, if the proof is not well written, then you must then revise the proof by writing it according to the guidelines presented in this text.(a) Proposition. If \(m\) is an even integer, then \((5 m+4)\) is an even integer. \mathrm{\\{} \text { Proof. We see that } 5 m + 4 = 1 0 n + 4 \(=2(5 n+2)\). Therefore, \((5 m+4)\) is an even integer. (b) Proposition. For all real numbers \(x\) and \(y,\) if \(x \neq y, x>0,\) and \(y>0,\) then \(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}>2\) \mathrm{\\{} P r o o f . ~ S i n c e ~ \(x\) and \(y\) are positive real numbers, \(x y\) is positive and we can multiply both sides of the inequality by \(x y\) to obtain $$ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}\right) \cdot x y &>2 \cdot x y \\ x^{2}+y^{2} &>2 x y \end{aligned} $$ By combining all terms on the left side of the inequality, we see that \(x^{2}-2 x y+y^{2}>0\) and then by factoring the left side, we obtain \((x-y)^{2}>0 .\) Since \(x \neq y,(x-y) \neq 0\) and so \((x-y)^{2}>0 .\) This proves that if \(x \neq y, x>0,\) and \(y>0,\) then \(\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}>2\) (c) Proposition. For all integers \(a, b,\) and \(c,\) if \(a \mid(b c),\) then \(a \mid b\) or \(a \mid c\). \mathrm{\\{} P r o o f . ~ W e ~ a s s u m e ~ t h a t ~ \(a, b,\) and \(c\) are integers and that \(a\) divides \(b c\). So, there exists an integer \(k\) such that \(b c=k a\). We now factor \(k\) as \(k=m n,\) where \(m\) and \(n\) are integers. We then see that $$ b c=m n a . $$ This means that \(b=m a\) or \(c=n a\) and hence, \(a \mid b\) or \(a \mid c\). (d) Proposition. For all positive integers \(a, b,\) and \(c,\left(a^{b}\right)^{c}=a^{\left(b^{c}\right)}\). This proposition is false as is shown by the following counterexample: If we let \(a=2, b=3,\) and \(c=2,\) then $$ \begin{aligned} \left(a^{b}\right)^{c} &=a^{\left(b^{c}\right)} \\ \left(2^{3}\right)^{2} &=2^{\left(3^{2}\right)} \\ 8^{2} &=2^{9} \\ 64 & \neq 512 \end{aligned} $$

Let \(n\) be a natural number greater than 4 and let \(a\) be an integer that has a remainder of \(n-2\) when it is divided by \(n\). Make whatever conclusions you can about the remainder of \(a^{2}\) when it is divided by \(n\). Justify all conclusions.

See the instructions for Exercise (19) on page 100 from Section 3.1 . (a) For all nonzero integers \(a\) and \(b,\) if \(a+2 b \neq 3\) and \(9 a+2 b \neq 1,\) then the equation \(a x^{3}+2 b x=3\) does not have a solution that is a natural number. \mathrm{P} \text { Proof } . We will prove the contrapositive, which is For all nonzero integers \(a\) and \(b\), if the equation \(a x^{3}+2 b x=3\) has a solution that is a natural number, then \(a+2 b=3\) or \(9 a+2 b=1\). So we let \(a\) and \(b\) be nonzero integers and assume that the natural number \(n\) is a solution of the equation \(a x^{3}+2 b x=3\). So we have $$ \begin{aligned} a n^{3}+2 b n &=3 \quad \text { or } \\ n\left(a n^{2}+2 b\right) &=3 \end{aligned} $$ So we can conclude that \(n=3\) and \(a n^{2}+2 b=1\). Since we now have the value of \(n\), we can substitute it in the equation \(a n^{3}+2 b n=3\) and obtain \(27 a+6 b=3\). Dividing both sides of this equation by 3 shows that \(9 a+2 b=1\). So there is no need for us to go any further, and this concludes the proof of the contrapositive of the proposition. (b) For all nonzero integers \(a\) and \(b,\) if \(a+2 b \neq 3\) and \(9 a+2 b \neq 1,\) then the equation \(a x^{3}+2 b x=3\) does not have a solution that is a natural number. We will use a proof by contradiction. Let us assume that there exist nonzero integers \(a\) and \(b\) such that \(a+2 b=3\) and \(9 a+2 b=1\) and \(a n^{3}+2 b n=3,\) where \(n\) is a natural number. First, we will solve one equation for \(2 b\); doing this, we obtain $$ \begin{aligned} a+2 b &=3 \\ 2 b &=3-a . \end{aligned} $$ We can now substitute for \(2 b\) in \(a n^{3}+2 b n=3\). This gives $$ \begin{array}{l} a n^{3}+(3-a) n=3 \\ a n^{3}+3 n-a n=3 \\ n\left(a n^{2}+3-a\right)=3 . \end{array} $$ By the closure properties of the integers, \(\left(a n^{2}+3-a\right)\) is an integer and, hence, equation (2) implies that \(n\) divides \(3 .\) So \(n=1\) or \(n=3\). When we substitute \(n=1\) into the equation \(a n^{3}+2 b n=3,\) we obtain \(a+2 b=3\). This is a contradiction since we are told in the proposition that \(a+2 b \neq 3\). This proves that the negation of the proposition is false and, hence, the proposition is true.

(a) Let \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) and let \(a \in \mathbb{Z}\). Explain why \(n\) divides \(a\) if and only if \(a \equiv 0(\bmod n)\) (b) Let \(a \in \mathbb{Z}\). Explain why if \(a \neq 0(\bmod 3),\) then \(a \equiv 1(\bmod 3)\) or \(a \equiv 2(\bmod 3)\) (c) Is the following proposition true or false? Justify your conclusion. For each \(a \in \mathbb{Z},\) if \(a \neq 0(\bmod 3),\) then \(a^{2} \equiv 1(\bmod 3)\).

Let \(a\) and \(b\) be integers. Prove that if \(a \equiv 7(\bmod 8)\) and \(b \equiv 3(\bmod 8)\), then: (a) \(a+b \equiv 2(\bmod 8) ;\) (b) \(a \cdot b \equiv 5(\bmod 8)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.