/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Let \(x\) be a real number. Cons... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(x\) be a real number. Consider the following conditional statement: If \(x^{3}-x=2 x^{2}+6,\) then \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\) Which of the following statements have the same meaning as this conditional statement and which ones are negations of this conditional statement? Explain each conclusion. (See the note in the instructions for Exercise (10).) (a) If \(x \neq-2\) and \(x \neq 3,\) then \(x^{3}-x \neq 2 x^{2}+6\) (b) If \(x=-2\) or \(x=3,\) then \(x^{3}-x=2 x^{2}+6\) (c) If \(x \neq-2\) or \(x \neq 3,\) then \(x^{3}-x \neq 2 x^{2}+6\) (d) If \(x^{3}-x=2 x^{2}+6\) and \(x \neq-2,\) then \(x=3\). (e) If \(x^{3}-x=2 x^{2}+6\) or \(x \neq-2,\) then \(x=3\). (f) \(x^{3}-x=2 x^{2}+6, x \neq-2,\) and \(x \neq 3\). (g) \(x^{3}-x \neq 2 x^{2}+6\) or \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statements with the same meaning as the given conditional statement are (b), (d), and (g). The statements that are negations of the given conditional statement are (a) and (f).

Step by step solution

01

Conditional Statement

Given the conditional statement: If \(x^3-x=2x^2+6\), then \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\). The goal is to identify the statements with the same meaning or the negations of this statement.
02

Analyze Statement (a)

Statement (a): If \(x \neq -2\) and \(x \neq 3\), then \(x^3-x \neq 2x^2+6\) This statement is the negation of the given statement because it negates both the antecedent and the consequent of the initial statement.
03

Analyze Statement (b)

Statement (b): If \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\), then \(x^3-x=2x^2+6\) This statement has the same meaning as the given statement since it keeps the same structure and meaning, simply reversing the antecedent and consequent.
04

Analyze Statement (c)

Statement (c): If \(x \neq -2\) or \(x \neq 3\), then \(x^3-x \neq 2x^2+6\) This statement is neither the same as the given statement nor its negation because both the antecedent and the consequent are changed with a logical disjunction instead of conjunction.
05

Analyze Statement (d)

Statement (d): If \(x^3-x=2x^2+6\) and \(x \neq -2\), then \(x=3\) This statement has the same meaning as the given statement because it incorporates an additional condition in the antecedent, ultimately arriving at the same conclusion.
06

Analyze Statement (e)

Statement (e): If \(x^3-x=2x^2+6\) or \(x \neq -2\), then \(x=3\) This statement is neither the same as the given statement nor its negation because it combines both cases into one antecedent without any distinction.
07

Analyze Statement (f)

Statement (f): \(x^3-x=2x^2+6\), \(x \neq -2\), and \(x \neq 3\) This statement is the negation of the given statement since all three conditions contradict the original statement.
08

Analyze Statement (g)

Statement (g): \(x^3-x \neq 2x^2+6\) or \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\) This statement has the same meaning as the given statement because it combines both cases and their negation into one single statement, essentially covering all possible outcomes.
09

Conclusion

Statements with the same meaning as the given conditional statement: (b), (d) and (g) Statements that are negations of the given conditional statement: (a) and (f)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mathematical Reasoning
Mathematical reasoning is an essential skill that enables students to construct and evaluate arguments, make predictions, and solve problems systematically. It involves understanding and applying logical operations to formulate sound conclusions based on given premises.

In the context of conditional statements, mathematical reasoning is employed to determine the relationships between various propositions, particularly when dealing with 'if-then' constructs. For instance, in the original exercise, we examine the logic behind the conditional statement 'If \(x^{3}-x=2x^{2}+6\), then \(x=-2\) or \(x=3\)' and its various rephrasings or negations. It is crucial to parse each proposition carefully, assess the logical flow from the hypothesis (antecedent) to the conclusion (consequent), and recognize how alterations affect the validity of the implication.

Through the step-by-step analysis of each statement option given in the exercise, students develop their mathematical reasoning by not only checking the veracity of the statements but also understanding the implications of negating or restructuring the conditions within the statements.
Negation of Statements
The negation of a statement, in logic, is the construction of a new statement that expresses the opposite of the original statement's truth. It is equivalent to saying 'It is not the case that...' before the original statement. To negate a conditional statement effectively, one must negate both the antecedent and the consequent.

In our original exercise, statement (a), 'If \(x eq -2\) and \(x eq 3\), then \(x^{3}-x eq 2x^{2}+6\)' is identified as the negation of the given conditional statement because it opposes the initial claim by specifying what happens when the given conditions are not met.

It's important to recognize that simple negation does not involve changing the structure or logic of the statement, but simply reversing its truth value. For example, negating 'If A, then B' becomes 'If A, then not B.' Additionally, the negation of a conjunction (and) is a disjunction (or), and vice versa, based on De Morgan's laws, which assert that the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations, and the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations.
Logical Conjunction and Disjunction
Logical conjunction and disjunction are fundamental operations in propositional logic. A conjunction, denoted by 'and', combines two statements such that the resulting statement is true only if both original statements are true. Conversely, a disjunction, denoted by 'or', combines statements in a way that the resulting statement is true if at least one of the original statements is true.

In the conditional statements we've been examining, these operations determine the relationship between different parts of the propositions. For example, statement (d), 'If \(x^{3}-x=2x^{2}+6\) and \(x eq -2\), then \(x=3\)', is relying on a conjunction to add an additional condition to the antecedent. Here, both conditions must be met for the conclusion to follow.

Understanding the correct application of conjunction and disjunction when analyzing or constructing logical propositions is crucial. Misinterpreting these can lead to incorrect conclusions, as seen in statement (e), which improperly combines unrelated conditions, illustrating the importance of clarity when dealing with logical operators in mathematical reasoning.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that \(P\) and \(Q\) are statements for which \(Q\) is false and \(\neg P \rightarrow Q\) is true (and it is not known if \(R\) is true or false). What conclusion (if any) can be made about the truth value of each of the following statements? (a) \(\neg Q \rightarrow P\) (b) \(P\) (c) \(P \wedge R\) (d) \(R \rightarrow \neg P\)

Write each of the following statements as an English sentence that does not use the symbols for quantifiers. * (a) \((\exists m \in \mathbb{Z})(\exists n \in \mathbb{Z})(m>n)\) (d) \((\forall m \in \mathbb{Z})(\forall n \in \mathbb{Z})(m>n)\) (b) \((\exists m \in \mathbb{Z})(\forall n \in \mathbb{Z})(m>n)\) (e) \((\exists n \in \mathbb{Z})(\forall m \in \mathbb{Z})\left(m^{2}>n\right)\) (c) \((\forall m \in \mathbb{Z})(\exists n \in \mathbb{Z})(m>n)\) (f) \((\forall n \in \mathbb{Z})(\exists m \in \mathbb{Z})\left(m^{2}>n\right)\)

Least Upper Bound for a Subset of \(\mathbb{R}\). In Exercise \(14,\) we introduced the definition of an upper bound for a subset of the real numbers. Assume that we know this definition and that we know what it means to say that a number is not an upper bound for a subset of the real numbers. Let \(A\) be a subset of \(\mathbb{R}\). A real number \(\alpha\) is the least upper bound for \(A\) provided that \(\alpha\) is an upper bound for \(A,\) and if \(\beta\) is an upper bound for \(A\), then \(\alpha \leq \beta\) Note: The symbol \(\alpha\) is the lowercase Greek letter alpha, and the symbol \(\beta\) is the lowercase Greek letter beta. If we define \(P(x)\) to be \(^{*} x\) is an upper bound for \(A\)," then we can write the definition for least upper bound as follows: A real number \(\alpha\) is the least upper bound for \(A\) provided that \(P(\alpha) \wedge[(\forall \beta \in \mathbb{R})(P(\beta) \rightarrow(\alpha \leq \beta))]\) (a) Why is a universal quantifier used for the real number \(\beta ?\) (b) Complete the following sentence in symbolic form: "A real number \(\alpha\) is not the least upper bound for \(A\) provided that ...."

Assume that the universal set is \(\mathbb{R}\). Consider the following sentence: $$ (\exists t \in \mathbb{R})(t \cdot x=20) $$ (a) Explain why this sentence is an open sentence and not a statement. (b) If 5 is substituted for \(x,\) is the resulting sentence a statement? If it is a statement, is the statement true or false? (c) If \(\pi\) is substituted for \(x,\) is the resulting sentence a statement? If it is a statement, is the statement true or false? (d) If 0 is substituted for \(x\), is the resulting sentence a statement? If it is a statement, is the statement true or false? (e) What is the truth set of the open sentence \((\exists t \in \mathbb{R})(t+x=20) ?\)

Prime Numbers. The following definition of a prime number is very important in many areas of mathematics. We will use this definition at various places in the text. It is introduced now as an example of how to work with a definition in mathematics. Definition. A natural number \(p\) is a prime number provided that it is greater than 1 and the only natural numbers that are factors of \(p\) are 1 and \(p .\) A natural number other than 1 that is not a prime number is a composite number. The number 1 is neither prime nor composite. Using the definition of a prime number, we see that \(2,3,5,\) and 7 are prime numbers. Also, 4 is a composite number since \(4=2 \cdot 2 ; 10\) is a composite number since \(10=2 \cdot 5 ;\) and 60 is a composite number since \(60=4 \cdot 15\). (a) Give examples of four natural numbers other than \(2,3,5,\) and 7 that are prime numbers. (b) Explain why a natural number \(p\) that is greater than 1 is a prime number provided that For all \(d \in \mathbb{N},\) if \(d\) is a factor of \(p,\) then \(d=1\) or \(d=p\). (c) Give examples of four natural numbers that are composite numbers and explain why they are composite numbers. (d) Write a useful description of what it means to say that a natural number is a composite number (other than saying that it is not prime).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.