/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 a) Let \(x_{0}\) be a noncritica... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

a) Let \(x_{0}\) be a noncritical point of a smooth function \(F: U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) defined in a neighborhood \(U\) of \(x_{0}=\left(x_{0}^{1}, \ldots, x_{0}^{m}\right) \in \mathbb{R}^{m} .\) Show that in some neighborhood \(\tilde{U} \subset U\) of \(x_{0}\) one can introduce curvilinear coordinates \(\left(\xi^{1}, \ldots, \xi^{m}\right)\) such that the set of points defined by the condition \(F(x)=F\left(x_{0}\right)\) will be given by the equation \(\xi^{m}=0\) in these new coordinates. b) Let \(\varphi, \psi \in C^{(k)}(D ; \mathbb{R})\), and suppose that \((\varphi(x)=0) \Rightarrow(\psi(x)=0)\) in the domain \(D .\) Show that if \(\operatorname{grad} \varphi \neq 0\), then there is a decomposition \(\psi=\theta \cdot \varphi\) in \(D\), where \(\theta \in C^{(k-1)}(D ; \mathbb{R})\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yes, in the neighborhood of a noncritical point, we can change the coordinate system such that the set of points with the same function value will be described by \(\xi^m=0\) in the new coordinates using the Rank theorem.

Step by step solution

01

Imply Rank theorem for smooth functions.

Since \(F\) is a smooth function defined in a neighborhood \(U\) of \(x_{0}\) and \(x_0\) is a noncritical point, we have \(\nabla F(x_0) \neq 0\). By the Rank theorem, there exists a smooth coordinate transformation \(g: \tilde{U}\to U\), in a neighborhood \(\tilde{U}\) of \(x_0\), which will be referred as curvilinear coordinates such that \(F(g(\xi^{1}, \ldots, \xi^{m}))=F(x_{0})\) for fixed \(\xi^m\) in \(\tilde{U}\).
02

Deduce the equation in new coordinates.

Using the fact that the set of points defined by the condition \(F(g(\xi^{1}, \ldots, \xi^{m}))=F(x_{0})\) and considering the curvilinear coordinates \(\left(\xi^{1}, \ldots, \xi^{m}\right)\) in \(\tilde{U}\). In these new coordinates the condition directly translates to \(\xi^{m}=0\), which concludes the result for part a. Part b:
03

Existence of function \(\theta\).

Consider the function \(\phi:\mathbb{R}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) from the conditions in part b, and use it as an implicit function due to the given condition \((\varphi(x)=0) \Rightarrow(\psi(x)=0)\). Since \(\nabla \phi \neq 0\), using the implicit function theorem, we can find a function \(\theta:\mathbb{R}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), depending continuously on \(x\), such that \(\phi(x) = \psi(x) - \theta(x)\).
04

Show the decomposition \(\psi=\theta\cdot\phi\).

To obtain the decomposition, notice that the conditions given imply that \(\psi(x)=0\) if and only if \(\phi(x)=0\), which means that \(\theta(x)=0\) whenever \(\phi(x)=0\) as well. Therefore, we have \(\psi(x)=\phi(x)\cdot\theta(x)\) for all \(x\in D\). Since \(\theta\in C^{(k-1)}(D;\mathbb{R})\) and \(\phi,\psi \in C^{(k)}(D;\mathbb{R})\), this decomposition holds, concluding the result for part b.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rank theorem
The Rank Theorem is a fundamental concept that links the rank of the Jacobian matrix of a function to local behavior in terms of coordinates. When we say a point is noncritical, it means the gradient (or derivative) of the function at that point is non-zero. If the gradient is non-zero, the rank of the Jacobian matrix at that point is maximized.

This theorem assures us that locally around such noncritical points, we can choose new coordinates (often called curvilinear coordinates) in which the function behaves more simply. These new coordinates are constructed by a smooth transformation that is one-to-one and invertible. Therefore, the Rank Theorem not only helps in simplifying the function locally but also guarantees the existence of these new, simpler coordinate systems. In practical applications, this can ease complex calculations and analysis within mathematical models.
Implicit function theorem
The Implicit Function Theorem is immensely useful when dealing with functions and constraints. Essentially, it provides conditions under which a relation defined implicitly by an equation can be solved for one variable as a function of others. When a function \( F(x, y) \) satisfies certain conditions, the theorem states that locally around a point, you can solve for one variable in terms of others.

One key condition for the theorem to hold is that the partial derivative (often called the gradient in this context) with respect to the variable you want to solve for should be non-zero. In the context of the exercise, this means ensuring that the gradient of some function \( \varphi \) is not zero, allowing it to act similarly to an implicit function. This theorem aids in concluding relationships where variables depend implicitly on one another, proving invaluable in many geometry and optimization problems.
Coordinate transformation
Coordinate transformation involves changing from one set of variables to another, similar to translating a graph onto different axes. It's a powerful tool when working with curves and surfaces, allowing them to be treated under simpler or more intuitive settings. In the context of smooth functions, this transformation often aims to make a function simpler by setting its constraints in a new coordinate system.

When dealing with a point like \( x_0 \) in the exercise, where transformations simplify a function by translating \( F(x) = F(x_0) \) to \( \xi^m = 0 \), it highlights the elegance of transforming coordinates. This simplification comes from the local nature of transformations around the chosen point, ensuring we can perceive complicated configuration into more manageable coordinate frameworks, leading to easier analysis and computation. Such transformations are exploited in many areas, from physics to engineering.
Gradient
In mathematics, the gradient of a function gives a vector defining the direction and rate of fastest increase of that function. You can think of it like arrows on a topographic map pointing to the steepest ascent.

If you have a function \( F: \mathbb{R}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \), the gradient at a point is a vector of partial derivatives, noted as \( abla F \). This gradient being non-zero signifies a noncritical point, which plays a crucial role in differentiating between local behaviors of functions. When the gradient points in a certain direction, it means any tiny step in that direction changes the functional value the most. Using gradients, not only can we find maximum or minimum values of functions (important in optimization problems), but we can also confirm non-degeneracy in transformations. The presence of a non-zero gradient is particularly essential for implying the Rank Theorem and the Implicit Function Theorem.
Curvilinear coordinates
Curvilinear coordinates are a specialized coordinate system where the coordinate lines may be curved. Unlike Cartesian coordinates, which line up on perpendicular grids, curvilinear coordinates can bend to encompass curved spaces or functions more naturally.

In the context of the exercise, converting a neighborhood \( \tilde{U} \) around a point \( x_0 \) into curvilinear coordinates means finding a mapping where the conditions of a function simplify into a straight line, such as \( \xi^m = 0 \). This turns complex surfaces or curves into simpler linear components, facilitating easier mathematical manipulation. Curvilinear coordinates are thus invaluable when working with asymmetrical systems or non-linear dynamics, often appearing in differential geometry and physics when addressing systems with unique symmetries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a) Verify that the tangent to a curve \(\Gamma: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}\) is defined invariantly relative to the choice of coordinate system in \(\mathbb{R}^{m}\). b) Verify that the tangent plane to the graph \(S\) of a function \(y=f\left(x^{1}, \ldots, x^{m}\right)\) is defined invariantly relative to the choice of coordinate system in \(\mathbb{R}^{m}\). c) Suppose the set \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^{m} \times \mathbb{R}^{1}\) is the graph of a function \(y=f\left(x^{1}, \ldots, x^{m}\right)\) in coordinates \(\left(x^{1}, \ldots, x^{m}, y\right)\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{m} \times \mathbb{R}^{1}\) and the graph of a function \(\tilde{y}=\) \(\tilde{f}\left(\tilde{x}^{1}, \ldots, \tilde{x}^{m}\right)\) in coordinates \(\left(\tilde{x}^{1}, \ldots, \tilde{x}^{m}, \tilde{y}\right)\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{m} \times \mathbb{R}^{1}\). Verify that the tangent plane to \(S\) is invariant relative to a linear change of coordinates in \(\mathbb{R}^{m} \times \mathbb{R}^{1}\). d) Verify that the Laplacian \(\Delta f=\sum_{i=1}^{m} \frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial x^{i^{2}}}(x)\) is defined invariantly relative to orthogonal coordinate transformations in \(\mathbb{R}^{m}\).

"If \(f(x, y, z)=0\), then \(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \cdot \frac{\partial y}{\partial x} \cdot \frac{\partial x}{\partial z}=-1 .\) " a) Give a precise meaning to this statement. b) Verify that it holds in the example of Clapeyron's ideal gas equation $$ \frac{P \cdot V}{T}=\mathrm{const} $$ and in the general case of a function of three variables. c) Write the analogous statement for the relation \(f\left(x^{1}, \ldots, x^{m}\right)=0\) among \(m\) variables. Verify that it is correct.

a) During so-called exterior disk grinding the grinding tool - a rapidly rotating grinding disk (with an abrasive rim) that acts as a file - is brought into contact with the surface of a circular machine part that is rotating slowly compared with the disk (see Fig. 8.3). The disk \(K\) is gradually pressed against the machine part \(D\), causing a layer \(H\) of metal to be removed, reducing the part to the required size and producing a smooth working surface for the device. In the machine where it will be placed this surface will usually be a working surface. In order to extend its working life, the metal of the machine part is subjected to a preliminary annealing to harden the steel. However, because of the high temperature in the contact zone between the machine part and the grinding disk, structural changes can (and frequently do) occur in a certain layer \(\Delta\) of metal in the machine part, resulting in decreased hardness of the steel in that layer. The quantity \(\Delta\) is a monotonic function of the rate \(s\) at which the disk is applied to the machine part, that is, \(\Delta=\varphi(s)\). It is known that there is a certain critical rate \(s_{0}>0\) at which the relation \(\Delta=0\) still holds, while \(\Delta>0\) whenever \(s>s_{0}\). For the following discussion it is convenient to introduce the relation $$ s=\psi(\Delta) $$ inverse to the one just given. This new relation is defined for \(\Delta>0\). Here \(\psi\) is a monotonically increasing function known experimentally, defined for \(\Delta \geq 0\), and \(\psi(0)=s_{0}>0\). The grinding process must be carried out in such a way that there are no structural changes in the metal on the surface eventually produced. In terms of rapidity, the optimal grinding mode under these conditions would obviously be a set of variations in the rate \(s\) of application of the grinding disk for which $$ s=\psi(\delta) $$ where \(\delta=\delta(t)\) is the thickness of the layer of metal not yet removed up to time \(t\), or, what is the same, the distance from the rim of the disk at time \(t\) to the final surface of the device being produced. Explain this. b) Find the time needed to remove a layer of thickness \(H\) when the rate of application of the disk is optimally adjusted. c) Find the dependence \(s=s(t)\) of the rate of application of the disk on time in the optimal mode under the condition that the function \(\Delta \stackrel{\psi}{\longrightarrow} s\) is linear: \(s=\) \(s_{0}+\lambda \Delta .\) Due to the structural properties of certain kinds of grinding lathes, the rate \(s\) can undergo only discrete changes. This poses the problem of optimizing the productivity of the process under the additional condition that only a fixed number \(n\) of switches in the rate \(s\) are allowed. The answers to the following questions give a picture of the optimal mode. d) What is the geometric interpretation of the grinding time \(t(H)=\int_{0}^{H} \frac{\mathrm{d} \delta}{\psi(\delta)}\) that you found in part b) for the optimal continuous variation of the rate \(s ?\) e) What is the geometric interpretation of the time lost in switching from the optimal continuous mode of variation of \(s\) to the time-optimal stepwise mode of variation of \(s ?\) f) Show that the points \(0=x_{n+1}

We say that a vector field is defined in a domain \(G\) of \(\mathbb{R}^{m}\) if a vector \(\mathbf{v}(x) \in T \mathbb{R}_{x}^{m}\) is assigned to each point \(x \in G .\) A vector field \(\mathbf{v}(x)\) in \(G\) is called a potential field if there is a numerical-valued function \(U: G \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) such that \(\mathbf{v}(x)=\operatorname{grad} U(x)\). The function \(U(x)\) is called the potential of the field \(\mathbf{v}(x)\). (In physics it is the function \(-U(x)\) that is usually called the potential, and the function \(U(x)\) is called the force function when a field of force is being discussed.) a) On a plane with Cartesian coordinates \((x, y)\) draw the field grad \(f(x, y)\) for each of the following functions: \(f_{1}(x, y)=x^{2}+y^{2} ; f_{2}(x, y)=-\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) ;\) \(f_{3}(x, y)=\arctan (x / y)\) in the domain \(y>0 ; f_{4}(x, y)=x y\). b) By Newton's law a particle of mass \(m\) at the point \(0 \in \mathbb{R}^{3}\) attracts a particle of mass 1 at the point \(x \in \mathbb{R}^{3}(x \neq 0)\) with force \(\mathbf{F}=-m|\mathbf{r}|^{-3} \mathbf{r}\), where \(\mathbf{r}\) is the vector \(\overrightarrow{O x}\) (we have omitted the dimensional constant \(G_{0}\) ). Show that the vector field \(\mathbf{F}(x)\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3} \backslash 0\) is a potential field. c) Verify that masses \(m_{i}(i=1, \ldots, n)\) located at the points \(\left(\xi_{i}, \eta_{i}, \zeta_{i}\right)(i=\) \(1, \ldots, n\) ) respectively, create a Newtonian force field except at these points and that the potential is the function $$ U(x, y, z)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{m_{i}}{\sqrt{\left(x-\xi_{i}\right)^{2}+\left(y-\eta_{i}\right)^{2}+\left(z-\zeta_{i}\right)^{2}}} $$ d) Find the potential of the electrostatic field created by point charges \(q_{i}(i=\) \(1, \ldots, n\) ) located at the points \(\left(\xi_{i}, \eta_{i}, \zeta_{i}\right)(i=1, \ldots, n)\) respectively.

Taylor's formula in multi-index notation. The symbol \(\alpha:=\left(\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{m}\right)\) consisting of nonnegative integers \(\alpha_{i}, i=1, \ldots, m\), is called the multi-index \(\alpha\). The following notation is conventional: $$ \begin{aligned} |\alpha|: &=\alpha_{1}+\cdots+\alpha_{m} \\ \alpha ! &:=\alpha_{1} ! \cdots \alpha_{m} ! \end{aligned} $$ finally, if \(a=\left(a_{1}, \ldots, a_{m}\right)\), then $$ a^{\alpha}:=a_{1}^{\alpha_{1}} \cdots a_{m}^{\alpha_{m}} $$ a) Verify that if \(k \in \mathbb{N}\), then $$ \left(a_{1}+\cdots+a_{m}\right)^{k}=\sum_{|\alpha|=k} \frac{k !}{\alpha_{1} ! \cdots \alpha_{m} !} a_{1}^{\alpha_{1}} \cdots a_{m}^{\alpha_{m}} $$ or $$ \left(a_{1}+\cdots+a_{m}\right)^{k}=\sum_{|\alpha|=k} \frac{k !}{\alpha !} a^{\alpha} $$ where the summation extends over all sets \(\alpha=\left(\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{m}\right)\) of nonnegative integers such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{m} \alpha_{i}=k\). b) Let $$ D^{\alpha} f(x):=\frac{\partial^{|\alpha|} f}{\left(\partial x^{1}\right)^{\alpha 1} \cdots\left(\partial x^{m}\right)^{\alpha_{m}}}(x) $$ Show that if \(f \in C^{(k)}(G ; \mathbb{R})\), then the equality $$ \sum_{i_{1}+\cdots+i_{m}=k} \partial_{i_{1} \cdots i_{k}} f(x) h^{i_{1}} \cdots h^{i_{k}}=\sum_{|\alpha|=k} \frac{k !}{\alpha !} D^{\alpha} f(x) h^{\alpha} $$ where \(h=\left(h^{1}, \ldots, h^{m}\right)\), holds at any point \(x \in G\). c) Verify that in multi-index notation Taylor's theorem with the Lagrange form of the remainder, for example, can be written as $$ f(x+h)=\sum_{|\alpha|=0}^{n-1} \frac{1}{\alpha !} D^{\alpha} f(x) h^{\alpha}+\sum_{|\alpha|=n} \frac{1}{\alpha !} D^{\alpha} f(x+\theta h) h^{\alpha} $$ d) Write Taylor's formula in multi-index notation with the integral form of the remainder (Theorem 4\()\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.