/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Let \(A\) be a symmetric \(n \ti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(A\) be a symmetric \(n \times n\) matrix. Show that \(\|A\|_{\infty}=\|A\|_{1}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
For a symmetric \(n \times n\) matrix A, using the definitions of the 1-norm and infinity norm and the symmetry property \(a_{ij} = a_{ji}\), we can show that: \(\|A\|_{1} = \max_{1 \leq j \leq n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\) \(\|A\|_{1} = \max_{1 \leq i \leq n} \sum_{j=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\) \(\|A\|_{\infty} = \max_{1 \leq i \leq n} \sum_{j=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\) Thus, for a symmetric \(n \times n\) matrix A, \(\|A\|_{\infty} = \|A\|_{1}\).

Step by step solution

01

Write the 1-norm of A as a function of row sums

Using the definition of the 1-norm: \(\|A\|_{1} = \max_{1 \leq j \leq n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\)
02

Use the symmetry property of A, \(a_{ij} = a_{ji}\), to rewrite the 1-norm of A

As A is symmetric, we can substitute each occurrence of \(a_{ij}\) with \(a_{ji}\). So, the 1-norm becomes: \(\|A\|_{1} = \max_{1 \leq j \leq n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}|a_{ji}|\)
03

Rewrite the sum in terms of row sums instead of column sums

Notice that the sum inside the max function is now a sum of elements in a row instead of a column. So, we can rewrite the expression using the index variable i instead of j: \(\|A\|_{1} = \max_{1 \leq i \leq n} \sum_{j=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\)
04

Use the definition of the infinity norm of A

The expression we obtained in step 3 is the definition of the infinity norm of A: \(\|A\|_{\infty} = \max_{1 \leq i \leq n} \sum_{j=1}^{n}|a_{ij}|\)
05

Confirm the equality

Comparing the expressions from steps 3 and 4, we can clearly see that: \(\|A\|_{\infty} = \|A\|_{1} \) Therefore, for a symmetric \(n \times n\) matrix A, it is true that \(\|A\|_{\infty} = \|A\|_{1}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(A\) be a \(3 \times 3\) matrix, and assume that \(A\) can be transformed into a lower triangular matrix \(L\) by using only column operations of type III; that is, \\[ A E_{1} E_{2} E_{3}=L \\] where \(E_{1}, E_{2}, E_{3}\) are elementary matrices of type III. Let $$ U=\left(E_{1} E_{2} E_{3}\right)^{-1} $$ Show that \(U\) is upper triangular with 1 's on the diagonal and \(A=L U .\) (This exercise illustrates a column version of Gaussian elimination.

Let \(A\) be an \(n \times n\) matrix and let \(Q\) and \(V\) be \(n \times n\) orthogonal matrices. Show that (a) \(\|Q A\|_{2}=\|A\|_{2}\) (b) \(\|A V\|_{2}=\|A\|_{2}\) (c) \(\|Q A V\|_{2}=\|A\|_{2}\)

Let \\[ A=\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 2 \\ -1 & -1 \end{array}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad \mathbf{u}_{0}=\left(\begin{array}{l} 1 \\ 1 \end{array}\right) \\] (a) Compute \(\mathbf{u}_{1}, \mathbf{u}_{2}, \mathbf{u}_{3},\) and \(\mathbf{u}_{4},\) using the power method. (b) Explain why the power method will fail to converge in this case.

Let \\[ R=\left(\begin{array}{rr} \cos \theta & -\sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{array}\right] \\] Show that if \(\theta\) is not an integer multiple of \(\pi,\) then \(R\) can be factored into a product \(R=U L U\), where \(U=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1 & \frac{\cos \theta-1}{\sin \theta} \\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right) \quad\) and \(\quad L=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1 & 0 \\ \sin \theta & 1\end{array}\right)\) This type of factorization of a rotation matrix arises in applications involving wavelets and filter bases.

Let \(A=L U\), where \(L\) is lower triangular with 1 's on the diagonal and \(U\) is upper triangular. (a) How many scalar additions and multiplications are necessary to solve \(L \mathbf{y}=\mathbf{e}_{j}\) by forward substitution? (b) How many additions/subtractions and multiplications/divisions are necessary to solve \(A \mathbf{x}=\) \(\mathbf{e}_{j} ?\) The solution \(\mathbf{x}_{j}\) of \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{e}_{j}\) will be the \(j\) th column of \(A^{-1}\) (c) Given the factorization \(A=L U\), how many additional multiplications/ divisions and additions/subtractions are needed to compute \(A^{-1} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.