/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q60E On September 30, 1744, the Swiss... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

On September 30, 1744, the Swiss mathematician Gabriel Cramer (1704鈥1752) wrote a remarkable letter to his countryman Leonhard Euler, concerning the issue of fitting a cubic to given points in the plane. He states two 鈥渇acts鈥 about cubics: (1) Any nine distinct points determine a unique cubic. (2) Two cubics can intersect in nine points. Cramer points out that these two statements are incompatible. If we consider two specific cubics that intersect in nine points (suchasx3x=0and), then there is more than one cubic through these nine points, contradicting the first 鈥渇act.鈥 Something is terribly wrong here, and Cramer asks Euler, the greatest mathematician of that time, to resolve this apparent contradiction. (This issue is now known as the Cramer鈥揈uler paradox.)

Euler worked on the problem for a while and put his answer into an article he submitted in 1747, 鈥淪ur one contradiction apparentedans la doctrine des lignescourbes鈥 [Memoires de l鈥橝cad 麓 emie des Sciences de 麓 Berlin, 4 (1750): 219鈥233].

Using Exercises 46 through 59 as a guide, explain which of the so-called facts stated by Cramer is wrong, thus resolving the paradox.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Cramer鈥檚 second statement is true, and Cramer鈥檚 first statement is not always true.

Step by step solution

01

Describe the given information

The given facts are,

  1. Any nine distinct points determine a unique cubic.

2. Two cubics can intersect in nine points

02

Explain which of the so-called facts stated by Cramer is wrong

Cramer鈥檚 second statement is true. For instance, the cubic x(x1)(x2)and the cubicy(y1)(y2)intersect at the following nine points.

{(0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2)}

However, Cramer鈥檚 first statement is not always true.

Consider exercise 53.

In this case, the nine points defined a single cubic. However, for exercise 48 and 54, the nine points defined a family of cubic.

Observed that the criterion for the nine points to define a single cubic is that the matrixAshould have rank 9, as in exercise 53. In exercises 48 and 54, the matrix had rank8and the cubic was not uniquely defined.

The matrix is defined by,

A=[1x1y1x12x1y1y12x13x12y1x1y12y131x2y2x22x2y2y22x23x22y2x2y22y231x3y3x32x3y3y32x33x32y3x3y32y331x9y9x92x9y9y92x93x92y9x9y92y93]

Hence, the Cramer鈥檚 second statement is true, and Cramer鈥檚 first statement is not always true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.