Chapter 5: Q7.4-25E (page 267)
Consider an invertible n × n matrix A such that the zero state is a stable equilibrium of the dynamical system What can you say about the stability of the systems
Short Answer
The given value is unstable
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 5: Q7.4-25E (page 267)
Consider an invertible n × n matrix A such that the zero state is a stable equilibrium of the dynamical system What can you say about the stability of the systems
The given value is unstable
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Question: Is \(\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}1\\{ - 2}\\1\end{array}} \right)\) an eigenvector of\(\left){\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}3&6&7\\3&3&7\\5&6&5\end{array}} \right)\)? If so, find the eigenvalue.
Let\(B = \left\{ {{{\bf{b}}_{\bf{1}}},{{\bf{b}}_{\bf{2}}},{{\bf{b}}_{\bf{3}}}} \right\}\) and \(D = \left\{ {{{\bf{d}}_{\bf{1}}},{{\bf{d}}_{\bf{2}}}} \right\}\) be bases for vector space \(V\) and \(W\), respectively. Let \(T:V \to W\) be a linear transformation with the property that
\(T\left( {{{\bf{b}}_1}} \right) = 3{{\bf{d}}_1} - 5{{\bf{d}}_2}\), \(T\left( {{{\bf{b}}_2}} \right) = - {{\bf{d}}_1} + 6{{\bf{d}}_2}\), \(T\left( {{{\bf{b}}_3}} \right) = 4{{\bf{d}}_2}\)
Find the matrix for \(T\) relative to \(B\), and\(D\).
Question 18: It can be shown that the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue \(\lambda \) is always greater than or equal to the dimension of the eigenspace corresponding to \(\lambda \). Find \(h\) in the matrix \(A\) below such that the eigenspace for \(\lambda = 5\) is two-dimensional:
\[A = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}5&{ - 2}&6&{ - 1}\\0&3&h&0\\0&0&5&4\\0&0&0&1\end{array}} \right]\]
A common misconception is that if \(A\) has a strictly dominant eigenvalue, then, for any sufficiently large value of \(k\), the vector \({A^k}{\bf{x}}\) is approximately equal to an eigenvector of \(A\). For the three matrices below, study what happens to \({A^k}{\bf{x}}\) when \({\bf{x = }}\left( {{\bf{.5,}}{\bf{.5}}} \right)\), and try to draw general conclusions (for a \({\bf{2 \times 2}}\) matrix).
a. \(A{\bf{ = }}\left( {\begin{aligned}{ {20}{c}}{{\bf{.8}}}&{\bf{0}}\\{\bf{0}}&{{\bf{.2}}}\end{aligned}} \right)\) b. \(A{\bf{ = }}\left( {\begin{aligned}{ {20}{c}}{\bf{1}}&{\bf{0}}\\{\bf{0}}&{{\bf{.8}}}\end{aligned}} \right)\) c. \(A{\bf{ = }}\left( {\begin{aligned}{ {20}{c}}{\bf{8}}&{\bf{0}}\\{\bf{0}}&{\bf{2}}\end{aligned}} \right)\)
In Exercises \({\bf{3}}\) and \({\bf{4}}\), use the factorization \(A = PD{P^{ - {\bf{1}}}}\) to compute \({A^k}\) where \(k\) represents an arbitrary positive integer.
4. \(\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ - 2}&{12}\\{ - 1}&5\end{array}} \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}3&4\\1&1\end{array}} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}2&0\\0&1\end{array}} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ - 1}&4\\1&{ - 3}\end{array}} \right)\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.