Chapter 6: Problem 35
Let \(T: V \rightarrow W\) be a linear transformation between two finite- dimensional vector spaces. (a) Prove that if \(\operatorname{dim} V<\operatorname{dim} W\), then \(T\) cannot be onto. (b) Prove that if \(\operatorname{dim} V>\operatorname{dim} W\), then \(T\) cannot be one-to-one.
Short Answer
Expert verified
(a) If \(\dim V < \dim W\), \(T\) cannot be onto. (b) If \(\dim V > \dim W\), \(T\) cannot be one-to-one.
Step by step solution
01
Understand Dimension Concepts
Recall that for any linear transformation \(T: V \rightarrow W\), if it is onto (surjective), the dimension of \(W\) must be less than or equal to the dimension of \(V\). Similarly, if \(T\) is one-to-one (injective), the dimension of \(V\) must be less than or equal to the dimension of \(W\).
02
Prove Part (a) - Onto Condition
Suppose \( \dim V < \dim W \). If \(T\) were onto, then by the Rank-Nullity Theorem, \( \dim V = \dim( ext{Range of } T) + \dim( ext{Kernel of } T) = \dim W\). But this leads to a contradiction since \( \dim V \) is less than \( \dim W \), thus \(T\) cannot be onto.
03
Prove Part (b) - One-to-One Condition
Suppose \( \dim V > \dim W \). If \(T\) were one-to-one, then by the Rank-Nullity Theorem, \( \dim V = \dim( ext{Range of } T) + 0 = \dim( ext{Range of } T) \). Since \(T\) is one-to-one, its range is a subspace of \(W\) and \( \dim( ext{Range of } T) \leq \dim W \). However, we have \( \dim V > \dim W \), leading to a contradiction, implying \(T\) cannot be one-to-one.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Vector Spaces
Vector spaces are fundamental structures in linear algebra. They provide a framework within which vectors can be added together and multiplied by scalars. A vector space is defined as a set of vectors, along with two operations: vector addition and scalar multiplication.
To qualify as a vector space, a set must satisfy several axioms. These include:
To qualify as a vector space, a set must satisfy several axioms. These include:
- Commutativity of addition
- Associativity of addition
- Existence of an additive identity (zero vector)
- Existence of additive inverses (negative vectors)
- Distributive properties
- Compatibility of scalar multiplication with field multiplication
- Existence of a multiplicative identity for scalars
Dimension
The concept of dimension in vector spaces is pivotal for understanding their structure. The dimension of a vector space is the number of vectors in a basis for the space. A basis is a set of linearly independent vectors that span the entire vector space.
For example, the vector space \(\mathbb{R}^3\)\ has a dimension of 3. This is because any three vectors that are linearly independent and span the space can form a basis for \(\mathbb{R}^3\)\.
Dimension is a key factor when analyzing linear transformations between vector spaces. For a transformation \(\mathrm{T}: V \rightarrow W\)\, understanding the dimensions of \(\mathrm{V}\)\ and \(\mathrm{W}\)\ helps determine properties like whether the transformation is onto or one-to-one.
For example, the vector space \(\mathbb{R}^3\)\ has a dimension of 3. This is because any three vectors that are linearly independent and span the space can form a basis for \(\mathbb{R}^3\)\.
Dimension is a key factor when analyzing linear transformations between vector spaces. For a transformation \(\mathrm{T}: V \rightarrow W\)\, understanding the dimensions of \(\mathrm{V}\)\ and \(\mathrm{W}\)\ helps determine properties like whether the transformation is onto or one-to-one.
Rank-Nullity Theorem
The Rank-Nullity Theorem is a cornerstone of linear algebra. It relates three important quantities for any linear transformation \(\mathrm{T}: V \rightarrow W\)\: the rank, the nullity, and the dimension of the domain \(\mathrm{V}\)\.
The theorem states:
\[ \operatorname{dim} V = \operatorname{Rank}(T) + \operatorname{Nullity}(T) \]
Here, the rank of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is the dimension of the image (also called range) of \(\mathrm{T}\). The nullity of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is the dimension of the kernel of \(\mathrm{T}\), which consists of all vectors in \(\mathrm{V}\)\ that map to the zero vector in \(\mathrm{W}\).
This theorem is particularly useful for analyzing and proving properties about transformations, such as whether they are onto or one-to-one.
The theorem states:
\[ \operatorname{dim} V = \operatorname{Rank}(T) + \operatorname{Nullity}(T) \]
Here, the rank of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is the dimension of the image (also called range) of \(\mathrm{T}\). The nullity of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is the dimension of the kernel of \(\mathrm{T}\), which consists of all vectors in \(\mathrm{V}\)\ that map to the zero vector in \(\mathrm{W}\).
This theorem is particularly useful for analyzing and proving properties about transformations, such as whether they are onto or one-to-one.
Onto (Surjective)
A linear transformation \(\mathrm{T}: V \rightarrow W\)\ is termed 'onto' or 'surjective' if every vector in \(\mathrm{W}\)\ is the image of at least one vector in \(\mathrm{V}\)\.
Mathematically, \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is onto if for every \(\mathbf{w} \in W\)\, there exists at least one \(\mathbf{v} \in V\)\ such that \(\mathrm{T}(\mathbf{v}) = \mathbf{w}\)\. When demonstrating that a transformation is onto, one must often show that the dimension of the range of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is equal to the dimension of \(\mathrm{W}\).
If \(\operatorname{dim} V < \operatorname{dim} W\)\, then by the Rank-Nullity Theorem, \(\mathrm{T}\)\ cannot be onto. There simply aren't enough vectors in \(\mathrm{V}\)\ to cover all possible outputs in \(\mathrm{W}\)\.
Mathematically, \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is onto if for every \(\mathbf{w} \in W\)\, there exists at least one \(\mathbf{v} \in V\)\ such that \(\mathrm{T}(\mathbf{v}) = \mathbf{w}\)\. When demonstrating that a transformation is onto, one must often show that the dimension of the range of \(\mathrm{T}\)\ is equal to the dimension of \(\mathrm{W}\).
If \(\operatorname{dim} V < \operatorname{dim} W\)\, then by the Rank-Nullity Theorem, \(\mathrm{T}\)\ cannot be onto. There simply aren't enough vectors in \(\mathrm{V}\)\ to cover all possible outputs in \(\mathrm{W}\)\.
One-to-One (Injective)
A linear transformation \(\mathrm{T}: V \rightarrow W\)\ is called 'one-to-one' or 'injective' if each vector in the domain maps to a unique vector in the codomain.
This means \( ext{T}(\mathbf{v}_1) = ext{T}(\mathbf{v}_2)\)\ implies \(\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{v}_2\)\. To prove injectivity, one often shows that the dimension of the kernel of \( ext{T}\)\ is zero, indicating that the only solution to \( ext{T}(\mathbf{v}) = \mathbf{0}\)\ is \(\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}\)\.
In practical terms, if \(\operatorname{dim} V > \operatorname{dim} W\)\, \(\text{T}\)\ cannot be injective. The reason is, there are more vectors in \(\text{V}\)\ than distinct values that can exist in \(\text{W}\), forcing some different vectors in \(\text{V}\)\ to map to the same vector in \(\text{W}\).
This means \( ext{T}(\mathbf{v}_1) = ext{T}(\mathbf{v}_2)\)\ implies \(\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{v}_2\)\. To prove injectivity, one often shows that the dimension of the kernel of \( ext{T}\)\ is zero, indicating that the only solution to \( ext{T}(\mathbf{v}) = \mathbf{0}\)\ is \(\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}\)\.
In practical terms, if \(\operatorname{dim} V > \operatorname{dim} W\)\, \(\text{T}\)\ cannot be injective. The reason is, there are more vectors in \(\text{V}\)\ than distinct values that can exist in \(\text{W}\), forcing some different vectors in \(\text{V}\)\ to map to the same vector in \(\text{W}\).