/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 For what value(s) of \(k,\) if a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For what value(s) of \(k,\) if any, will the systems have (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions? \(k x+y=-2\) \(2 x-2 y=4\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) No solution for \(k = -1\); (b) Unique solution for \(k \neq -1\); (c) No \(k\) for infinitely many solutions.

Step by step solution

01

Write the System of Equations

The given system of equations is: 1. \(kx + y = -2\) 2. \(2x - 2y = 4\)
02

Convert to Standard Form

Write both equations in the standard form, which is \(Ax + By = C\): 1. \(kx + y = -2\) stays the same. 2. \(2x - 2y = 4\) simplifies to \(x - y = 2\) by dividing the whole equation by 2.
03

Analyze for No Solution

For the system to have no solution, the lines must be parallel with different intercepts. This occurs when the coefficients of \(x\) and \(y\) in both equations are proportional but the constant terms are not. Compare: - \(k/1 = 1/-1\) - \(-2/(-2) eq 4/2\) Hence, solving \(k = -1\) satisfies the condition for no solutions.
04

Analyze for Unique Solution

For a unique solution, the lines must intersect at exactly one point. This happens when the lines have different slopes, meaning the ratio \(k/1 eq 1/-1\). \(k eq -1\) will result in unique solutions.
05

Analyze for Infinitely Many Solutions

For infinitely many solutions, the lines must coincide, which means the equations are multiples of each other. This happens if: \(k/1 = 1/-1\) and \(-2/(-2) = 4/2\). Since the constant terms do not match, no \(k\) will satisfy the conditions for infinitely many solutions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Unique Solution
A system of equations will have a unique solution when the two lines represented by the equations intersect at precisely one point on a graph. Imagine two straight lines crossing each other; this is where they meet only once. To check for a unique solution, we examine the slopes of both lines.

In our exercise, the equations were:
  • Equation 1: \(kx + y = -2\)
  • Equation 2: \(x - y = 2\)
For these lines to intersect at just one point, they must have different slopes. Recall that the slope-intercept form is \(y = mx + b\), where \(m\) represents the slope. By rearranging Equation 1 to this form, we get \(y = -kx - 2\), and from Equation 2, it simplifies to \(y = x - 2\).

To have different slopes:
  • The ratio of the coefficients of \(x\) in both equations must not be the same; that is \(k/1 eq 1/-1\). Simplifying, we find that \(k eq -1\).
If \(k\) is anything other than \(-1\), the lines will intersect once, resulting in a unique solution.
No Solution
When a system of equations has no solution, it means that the lines are parallel and never meet. Imagine two train tracks that run side by side but never cross. For this to hold true, the lines have the same slope but different y-intercepts. This parallel scenario means they are equidistant and will never touch.

For our equations, let's recall:
  • Equation 1: \(kx + y = -2\)
  • Equation 2: \(x - y = 2\)
To check for no solution, examine the coefficients. Lines will be parallel if the ratio of the coefficients of \(x\) in both equations equals the ratio of the coefficients of \(y\), but the constant terms do not match. Looking at the given system:

Compare the ratios:
  • \(k/1 = 1/-1\)
  • \(-2/(-2) eq 4/2\)
The condition \(k = -1\) holds for the coefficients, making the lines parallel. Since the constant terms don't match, the system has no solution when \(k = -1\).
Infinitely Many Solutions
Infinitely many solutions arise in a system of equations when the lines are essentially the same line, meaning they coincide perfectly on the graph. It's like saying one line is neatly stacked on top of another, so every point on one line is also on the other line.

In the provided system of equations, we are asked to find a scenario where this happens:
  • Equation 1: \(kx + y = -2\)
  • Equation 2: \(x - y = 2\)
For the lines to fully overlap, every part of Equation 1 must be a multiple of Equation 2.

This means:
  • The coefficients of \(x\) and \(y\) must be proportional as well as the constants on the other side:
  • \(k/1 = 1/-1\)
  • \(-2/(-2) = 4/2\)
However, the constants do not satisfy the condition of equality, meaning that the lines will never completely overlap. Thus, in this system, there is no value of \(k\) where the system has infinitely many solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For what value(s) of \(k,\) if any, will the systems have (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions? \(\begin{aligned} x+y+z &=2 \\ x+4 y-z &=k \\ 2 x-y+4 z &=k^{2} \end{aligned}\)

From elementary geometry we know that there is a unique straight line through any two points in a plane. Less well known is the fact that there is a unique parabola through any three noncollinear points in a plane. For each set of points below, find a parabola with an equation of the form \(y=a x^{2}+\) \(b x+c\) that passes through the given points. (Sketch the resulting parabola to check the validity of your answer.) (a) \((0,1),(-1,4),\) and (2,1) (b) \((-3,1),(-2,2),\) and (-1,5)

The coefficient matrix is not strictly diagonally dominant, nor can the equations be rearranged to make it so. However, both the Jacobi and the Gauss- Seidel method converge anyway. Demonstrate that this is true of the Gauss- Seidel method, starting with the zero vector as the initial approximation and obtaining a solution that is accurate to within 0.01. $$\begin{aligned} 5 x_{1}-2 x_{2}+3 x_{3} &=-8 \\ x_{1}+4 x_{2}-4 x_{3} &=102 \\ -2 x_{1}-2 x_{2}+4 x_{3} &=-90 \end{aligned}$$

Demonstrate that sometimes, if we are lucky, the form of an iterative problem may allow us to use a little insight to obtain an exact solution. An ant is standing on a number line at point \(A\). It walks halfway to point \(B\) and turns around. Then it walks halfway back to point \(A\), turns around again, and walks halfway to point \(B\). It continues to do this indefinitely. Let point \(A\) be at 0 and point \(B\) be at 1 The ant's walk is made up of a sequence of overlapping line segments. Let \(x_{1}\) record the positions of the left-hand endpoints of these segments and \(x_{2}\) their right-hand endpoints. (Thus, we begin with \(x_{1}=0\) and \(x_{2}=\frac{1}{2} .\) Then we have \(x_{1}=\frac{1}{4}\) and \(x_{2}=\frac{1}{2}\), and so on.) Figure 2.33 shows the start of the ant's walk. (a) Make a table with the first six values of \(\left[x_{1}, x_{2}\right]\) and plot the corresponding points on \(x_{1}, x_{2}\) coordinate axes. (b) Find two linear equations of the form \(x_{2}=a x_{1}+b\) and \(x_{1}=c x_{2}+d\) that determine the new values of the endpoints at each iteration. Draw the corresponding lines on your coordinate axes and show that this diagram would result from applying the Gauss-Seidel method to the system of linear equations you have found. (Your diagram should resemble Figure 2.27 on page \(132 .)\) (c) Switching to decimal representation, continue applying the Gauss-Seidel method to approximate the values to which \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are converging to within 0.001 accuracy. (d) Solve the system of equations exactly and compare your answers. Interpret your results.

What is wrong with the following "proof" that every matrix with at least two rows is row equivalent to a matrix with a zero row? Perform \(R_{2}+R_{1}\) and \(R_{1}+R_{2}\). Now rows 1 and 2 are identical. Now perform \(R_{2}-R_{1}\) to obtain a row of zeros in the second row.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.