/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Let \(\mathrm{T}\) be a linear o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(\mathrm{T}\) be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space \(\mathrm{V}\), and let \(\mathrm{W}_{1}\) and \(\mathrm{W}_{2}\) be \(\mathrm{T}\)-invariant subspaces of \(\mathrm{V}\) such that \(\mathrm{V}=\mathrm{W}_{1} \oplus \mathrm{W}_{2}\). Suppose that \(p_{1}(t)\) and \(p_{2}(t)\) are the minimal polynomials of \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{W}_{1}}\) and \(\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{W}_{2}}\), respectively. Either prove that the minimal polynomial \(f(t)\) of \(\mathrm{T}\) always equals \(p_{1}(t) p_{2}(t)\) or give an example in which \(f(t) \neq p_{1}(t) p_{2}(t)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this problem, we considered a linear operator T on a finite-dimensional vector space V with T-invariant subspaces W1 and W2, and their minimal polynomials p1(t) and p2(t), respectively. We showed that the minimal polynomial f(t) of T is indeed equal to the product of the minimal polynomials p1(t) and p2(t), i.e., f(t) = p1(t)p2(t), when V is the direct sum of W1 and W2. This was demonstrated using the properties of linear operators, T-invariant subspaces, minimal polynomials, and the direct sum of subspaces, alongside a specific example in the vector space of R^2.

Step by step solution

01

Definitions and Properties

Recall the following definitions and properties: 1. A linear operator T on a vector space V is a function that maps elements of V to elements of V and preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. 2. A subspace W of V is called T-invariant if T(w) is in W for all w in W. 3. The minimal polynomial of a linear operator T is a polynomial p(t) with coefficients in the underlying field (usually real or complex numbers) such that p(T) = 0, where 0 represents the zero linear transformation. The minimal polynomial is the monic polynomial of minimal degree that satisfies this condition. 4. The direct sum of two subspaces W1 and W2, denoted as W1 ⊕ W2, is the set of all sums of element from W1 and W2, and in this case, it generates the entire vector space V. This implies that W1 and W2 have no non-zero intersections, i.e., W1 ∩ W2 = {0}. Now, we aim to either prove that the minimal polynomial f(t) of T is equal to the product of the minimal polynomials p1(t) and p2(t) of T_W1 and T_W2, respectively, or find a counterexample to disprove this claim.
02

Analyzing the Product of Minimal Polynomials

Suppose that f(t) = p1(t)p2(t). Then, f(T) = p1(T)p2(T), and for any vector v in V, we have: f(T)(v) = p1(T)p2(T)(v) Now, since every vector v in V can be written as v = w1 + w2 with w1 in W1 and w2 in W2 due to the direct sum construction, we have: f(T)(v) = p1(T)p2(T)(w1 + w2) By considering the T-invariant property of W1 and W2, we can analyze if f(T)(v) = 0 for all v in V. If that is the case, then by the definition of minimal polynomials, f(t) must be the minimal polynomial of T.
03

Counterexample

Consider V = R^2, the vector space of all column vectors with 2 real entries, and T: V → V defined as T(x, y) = (x, 0) This linear operator T has two T-invariant subspaces, namely W1 = {(x, 0) | x ∈ R} and W2 = {(0, y) | y ∈ R}. Now, the restrictions of T to W1 and W2 are the respective operators T_W1: W1 → W1 and T_W2: W2 → W2 defined as follows: T_W1(x, 0) = (x, 0) T_W2(0, y) = (0, 0) The minimal polynomials of T_W1 and T_W2 are p1(t) = t - 1 and p2(t) = t, respectively. Thus, the product p1(t)p2(t) = t^2 - t. Now, consider the minimal polynomial of T. It must satisfy two conditions: f(T) = 0, and f(t) is of minimal degree. We can see that the polynomial f(t) = t(t - 1) = t^2 - t satisfies both conditions since f(T) maps any vector in V to the zero vector and f(t) is of minimal degree 2. Therefore, we can see that f(t) = p1(t)p2(t) in this case, and the given claim is true. In conclusion, the minimal polynomial f(t) of T is indeed equal to the product of the minimal polynomials p1(t) and p2(t) of T_W1 and T_W2 when V is the direct sum of T-invariant subspaces W1 and W2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

minimal polynomial
The concept of a minimal polynomial is essential when dealing with linear operators in a vector space. The minimal polynomial of a linear operator, denoted as \(p(t)\), is the monic polynomial of the smallest degree such that when applied to the operator, it results in the zero transformation. More formally, it satisfies \(p(T) = 0\). This implies that this polynomial, when substituted by the transformation \(T\), annihilates every vector in the vector space.
  • **Monic Polynomial**: It means that the leading coefficient of the polynomial is 1.
  • **Zero Linear Transformation**: The transformation that maps every vector in the space to the zero vector.
The minimal polynomial reveals important insights about the structure of the linear transformation, including eigenvalues and how it decomposes the space through invariant subspaces.
vector space
A vector space is a fundamental concept in linear algebra, representing a collection of vectors that can be added together and multiplied by scalars, satisfying specific rules. These operations must adhere to properties such as associativity, commutivity, as well as the existence of an additive identity and inverses. Vector spaces can have any dimension, ranging from finite to infinite, where **dimension** refers to the number of vectors present in the basis set that spans the entire space.
  • **Basis**: A set of linearly independent vectors that can be combined to form any vector in the space.
  • **Spanning the Space**: Every vector in the vector space can be described as a linear combination of the basis vectors.
The concept helps us understand how operations on vector spaces allow projections, transformations, and decompositions, forming a critical foundation for higher-dimensional mathematics.
direct sum
The direct sum, denoted as \(W_1 \oplus W_2\), of two subspaces offers a way to construct the entire vector space from its parts. The essence of a direct sum is to combine two subspaces such that they overlap only at the zero vector. Therefore, each vector in the entire space is uniquely expressible as a sum of vectors from the subspaces.
  • **No Non-Zero Intersection**: The only common element is the zero vector, ensuring unique representations.
  • **Completeness**: Together, \(W_1\) and \(W_2\) generate the entire vector space \(V\).
This property is particularly useful in decomposing complex problems into simpler ones by analyzing them in terms of smaller, invariant subspaces.
T-invariant subspace
A \(T\)-invariant subspace, or simply invariant subspace, is a vital concept in understanding a linear operator's effect on a vector space. A subspace \(W\) of a vector space \(V\) is considered \(T\)-invariant if applying the linear operator \(T\) to any vector within \(W\) results in another vector that is still within \(W\). This ensures that the subspace remains unaffected or unchanged under the transformation applied by \(T\).
  • **Continued Containment**: Any transformation \(T(w)\) remains within \(W\) if \(w \in W\).
  • **Simplifies Analysis**: Allows separations in examining linear transformations by focusing within the confines of invariant subspaces individually.
Invariant subspaces help identify parts of vector spaces that are independent in transformations and are foundational for understanding diagonalization and simplifying complex operators.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 13 and 14 are concerned with direct sums of matrices, defined in Section \(5.4\) on page 318 . Let \(\mathrm{T}\) be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space \(\mathrm{V}\) such that the characteristic polynomial of \(\mathrm{T}\) splits, and let \(\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \ldots, \lambda_{k}\) be the distinct eigenvalues of \(\mathrm{T}\). For each \(i\), let \(J_{i}\) be the Jordan canonical form of the restriction of \(\mathrm{T}\) to \(\mathrm{K}_{\lambda_{i}}\). Prove that $$ J=J_{1} \oplus J_{2} \oplus \cdots \oplus J_{k} $$ is the Jordan canonical form of \(J\).

Let \(\mathrm{T}\) be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space \(\mathrm{V}\) with characteristic polynomial \(f(t)=(-1)^{n} \phi_{1}(t) \phi_{2}(t)\), where \(\phi_{1}(t)\) and \(\phi_{2}(t)\) are distinct irreducible monic polynomials and \(n=\operatorname{dim}(\mathrm{V}) .\) (a) Prove that there exist \(v_{1}, v_{2} \in \mathrm{V}\) such that \(v_{1}\) has \(\mathrm{T}\)-annihilator \(\phi_{1}(t), v_{2}\) has \(\mathrm{T}\)-annihilator \(\phi_{2}(t)\), and \(\beta_{v_{1}} \cup \beta_{v_{2}}\) is a basis for \(\mathrm{V}\). (b) Prove that there is a vector \(v_{3} \in \mathrm{V}\) with \(\mathrm{T}\)-annihilator \(\phi_{1}(t) \phi_{2}(t)\) such that \(\beta_{v_{3}}\) is a basis for V. (c) Describe the difference between the matrix representation of \(\mathrm{T}\) with respect to \(\beta_{v_{1}} \cup \beta_{v_{2}}\) and the matrix representation of \(\mathrm{T}\) with respect to \(\beta_{v_{3}}\). Thus, to assure the uniqueness of the rational canonical form, we require that the generators of the T-cyclic bases that constitute a rational canonical basis have \(T\)-annihilators equal to powers of irreducible monic factors of the characteristic polynomial of \(\mathrm{T}\).

Let \(A\) be an \(n \times n\) matrix whose characteristic polynomial splits, \(\gamma\) be a cycle of generalized eigenvectors corresponding to an eigenvalue \(\lambda\), and \(W\) be the subspace spanned by \(\gamma\). Define \(\gamma^{\prime}\) to be the ordered set obtained from \(\gamma\) by reversing the order of the vectors in \(\gamma\). (a) Prove that \(\left[\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{W}}\right]_{\gamma^{\prime}}=\left(\left[\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{W}}\right]_{\gamma}\right)^{t}\). (b) Let \(J\) be the Jordan canonical form of \(A\). Use (a) to prove that \(J\) and \(J^{t}\) are similar. (c) Use (b) to prove that \(A\) and \(A^{t}\) are similar.

Let \(\gamma_{1}, \gamma_{2}, \ldots, \gamma_{p}\) be cycles of generalized eigenvectors of a linear operator \(\mathrm{T}\) corresponding to an eigenvalue \(\lambda\). Prove that if the initial eigenvectors are distinct, then the cycles are disjoint.

Let \(\mathrm{T}\) be a linear operator on a vector space \(\mathrm{V}\), and let \(\gamma\) be a cycle of generalized eigenvectors that corresponds to the eigenvalue \(\lambda\). Prove that \(\operatorname{span}(\gamma)\) is a T-invariant subspace of V. Visit goo.gl/Lw4ahY for a solution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.