/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Let \(\beta\) be a basis for a s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(\beta\) be a basis for a subspace \(W\) of an inner product space \(V\), and let \(z \in \mathrm{V}\). Prove that \(z \in \mathrm{W}^{\perp}\) if and only if \(\langle z, v\rangle=0\) for every \(v \in \beta\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
To prove that \(z \in W^{\perp}\) if and only if \(\langle z, v\rangle=0\) for every \(v \in \beta\), we proceed in two steps. Step 1: Assume \(z \in W^{\perp}\), then by definition, \(z\) is orthogonal to all elements of \(W\), and since every element of \(W\) can be expressed as a linear combination of elements in the basis \(\beta\), it must also be orthogonal to all elements in \(\beta\), meaning \(\langle z, v\rangle = 0\) for all \(v \in \beta\). Step 2: Assume \(\langle z, v\rangle = 0\) for all \(v \in \beta\), for a given \(z \in V\). Since \(W\) is spanned by \(\beta\), every \(w \in W\) can be represented as a linear combination of elements of \(\beta\). Calculating the inner product with \(z\) gives \(\langle z, w\rangle = \langle z, \sum ci * vi\rangle = \sum ci * \langle z, vi\rangle = 0\), which implies that \(z\) is orthogonal to all elements of \(W\). Thus, \(z\) must be in \(W^{\perp}\). Hence, \(z \in W^{\perp}\) if and only if \(\langle z, v\rangle = 0\) for all \(v \in \beta\).

Step by step solution

01

If z is in W⊥, then ⟨z, v⟩ = 0 for all v in β.

Since z is in W⊥, we know that it is orthogonal to all elements of W. By definition of a basis, every element of W can be expressed as a linear combination of elements in the basis β. So, if z is orthogonal to all elements of W, then it must also be orthogonal to all elements in the basis β. In terms of the inner product, this means that ⟨z, v⟩ = 0 for all v in β.
02

If ⟨z, v⟩ = 0 for all v in β, then z is in W⊥.

Let's assume that for a given z in V, the inner product ⟨z, v⟩ = 0 for all v in the basis β. As W is spanned by its basis β, every w in W can be represented as a linear combination of elements of β: w = ∑ ci * vi (where ci are coefficients and vi are elements of β). Calculating the inner product with z: ⟨z, w⟩ = ⟨z, ∑ ci * vi⟩ = ∑ ci * ⟨z, vi⟩. However, we already know that ⟨z, vi⟩ = 0 for all vi in β, so this sum will also be zero. Hence, ⟨z, w⟩ = 0 for all w in W, which means that z is orthogonal to all elements of W. As a result, z must be in W⊥. In conclusion, z is in W⊥ if and only if ⟨z, v⟩ = 0 for all v in β.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Basis of a Subspace
The concept of a basis is foundational in understanding structures within vector spaces, including inner product spaces. Simply put, the basis of a subspace is a set of vectors that are both linearly independent and span the subspace. This means that any vector within the subspace can be expressed as a unique linear combination of the basis vectors.

In the context of the exercise, \(\beta\) is such a set for the subspace \(W\) of an inner product space \(V\). When we say a vector \(z\) is orthogonal to the subspace or belongs to the orthogonal complement \(W^\perp\), none of its components lie within the subspace spanned by \(\beta\). Therefore, a vector will be in \(W^\perp\) if and only if it is orthogonal to every vector in the basis of \(W\).

To test whether \(z\) belongs to \(W^\perp\), you just need to check if the inner product of \(z\) with each basis vector \(v \in \beta\) is zero. If this is true, it means \(z\) has no projection onto any of the basis vectors, thereby confirming its orthogonality to the entire subspace.
Inner Product Space
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an additional structure called the inner product. This product is a mathematical tool that allows us to measure angles and lengths within the space, extending the concept of perpendicularity beyond the familiar 2D and 3D geometry. The inner product is a function that takes two vectors and returns a scalar, often denoted as \(\langle u, v\rangle\).

This inner product has several important properties, such as commutativity (\(\langle u, v\rangle = \langle v, u\rangle\)), linearity in each argument, and positivity (\(\langle v, v\rangle >=0\), with equality if and only if \(v\) is the zero vector). In our exercise, the inner product defines the notion of orthogonality within the space \(V\); \(z\) and \(v\) are orthogonal if their inner product \(\langle z, v\rangle\) is zero.
Orthogonal Complement
The orthogonal complement of a subspace \(W\) within an inner product space \(V\), usually denoted as \(W^\perp\), is the set of all vectors in \(V\) that are orthogonal to every vector in \(W\). It is a fundamental concept since it separates the space into two mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive parts: the subspace \(W\) and its orthogonal complement \(W^\perp\).

In the context of our exercise, a vector \(z\) is in \(W^\perp\) exactly when \(\langle z, v\rangle = 0\) for every vector \(v\) in the subspace \(W\). This relationship captures the essence of orthogonality in an inner product space and allows us to partition the space into perpendicular components, which has valuable implications for constructing orthogonal bases and simplifying computations within the space.
Linear Combinations
A linear combination in a vector space is a sum of scalars multiplied by vectors from the space. Mathematically, it is represented as \(c_1v_1 + c_2v_2 + ... + c_nv_n\), where \(c_i\) are scalars and \(v_i\) are vectors. In an inner product space, we often work with linear combinations to determine how vectors relate to the underlying subspaces.

Referring back to the exercise, any vector \(w\) in the subspace \(W\) can be written as a linear combination of the vectors in a basis \(\beta\) of \(W\). This ability to express vectors as linear combinations is critical for demonstrating properties such as the one in the exercise, where the inner product of \(z\) and any vector \(w \in W\) will be zero if \(z\) is orthogonal to every single basis vector in \(\beta\). This is because the zero result from each individual inner product term carries through the summation due to the distributive property of inner products over addition.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that \(\mathrm{T}\) is a linear operator on a complex (not necessarily finitedimensional) inner product space \(\mathrm{V}\) with an adjoint \(\mathrm{T}^{*}\). Prove the following results. (a) If \(\mathrm{T}\) is self-adjoint, then \(\langle\mathrm{T}(x), x\rangle\) is real for all \(x \in \mathrm{V}\). (b) If \(\mathrm{T}\) satisfies \(\langle\mathrm{T}(x), x\rangle=0\) for all \(x \in \mathrm{V}\), then \(\mathrm{T}=\mathrm{T}_{0}\). Hint: Replace \(x\) by \(x+y\) and then by \(x+i y\), and expand the resulting inner products. (c) If \(\langle\mathrm{T}(x), x\rangle\) is real for all \(x \in \mathrm{V}\), then \(\mathrm{T}\) is self-adjoint.

Let \(V\) be the inner product space of complex-valued continuous functions on \([0,1]\) with the inner product $$ \langle f, g\rangle=\int_{0}^{1} f(t) \overline{g(t)} d t . $$ Let \(h \in \mathrm{V}\), and define \(\mathrm{T}: \mathrm{V} \rightarrow \mathrm{V}\) by \(\mathrm{T}(f)=h f\). Prove that \(\mathrm{T}\) is a unitary operator if and only if \(|h(t)|=1\) for \(0 \leq t \leq 1\). red Hint for the "only if" part: Suppose that \(\mathrm{T}\) is unitary. Set \(f(t)=\) \(1-|h(t)|^{2}\) and \(g(t)=1\). Show that $$ \int_{0}^{1}\left(1-|h(t)|^{2}\right)^{2} d t=0, $$ and use the fact that if the integral of a nonnegative continuous function is zero, then the function is identically zero.

Recall the moving space vehicle considered in the study of time contraction. Suppose that the vehicle is moving toward a fixed star located on the \(x\)-axis of \(S\) at a distance \(b\) units from the origin of \(S\). If the space vehicle moves toward the star at velocity \(v\), Earthlings (who remain "almost" stationary relative to \(S\) ) compute the time it takes for the vehicle to reach the star as \(t=b / v\). Due to the phenomenon of time contraction, the astronaut perceives a time span of \(t^{\prime}=t \sqrt{1-v^{2}}=(b / v) \sqrt{1-v^{2}}\). A paradox appears in that the astronaut perceives a time span inconsistent with a distance of \(b\) and a velocity of \(v\). The paradox is resolved by observing that the distance from the solar system to the star as measured by the astronaut is less than \(b\). (a) At time \(t\) (as measured on \(C\) ), the space-time coordinates of the star relative to \(S\) and \(C\) are $$ \left(\begin{array}{l} b \\ 0 \\ t \end{array}\right) \text {. } $$ (b) At time \(t\) (as measured on \(C\) ), the space-time coordinates of the star relative to \(S^{\prime}\) and \(C^{\prime}\) are $$ \left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{b-v t}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}}} \\ 0 \\ \frac{t-b v}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}}} \end{array}\right) $$ (c) For $$ x^{\prime}=\frac{b-t v}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}}} \quad \text { and } \quad t^{\prime}=\frac{t-b v}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}}}, $$ we have \(x^{\prime}=b \sqrt{1-v^{2}}-t^{\prime} v\). This result may be interpreted to mean that at time \(t^{\prime}\) as measured by the astronaut, the distance from the astronaut to the star, as measured by the astronaut, (see Figure 6.9) is $$ b \sqrt{1-v^{2}}-t^{\prime} v . $$ Assuming that the coordinate systems \(S\) and \(S^{\prime}\) and clocks \(C\) and \(C^{\prime}\) are as in the discussion of time contraction, prove the following results. (d) Conclude from the preceding equation that (1) the speed of the space vehicle relative to the star, as measured by the astronaut, is \(v\); (2) the distance from Earth to the star, as measured by the astronaut, is \(b \sqrt{1-v^{2}}\). Thus distances along the line of motion of the space vehicle appear to be contracted by a factor of \(\sqrt{1-v^{2}}\).

Prove the following variant of Theorem 6.22: If \(f: \mathrm{V} \rightarrow \mathrm{V}\) is a rigid motion on a finite-dimensional real inner product space \(\mathrm{V}\), then there exists a unique orthogonal operator \(\mathrm{T}\) on \(\mathrm{V}\) and a unique translation \(g\) on \(\mathrm{V}\) such that \(f=\mathrm{T} \circ g\). (Note that the conclusion of Theorem \(6.22\) has \(f=g \circ \mathrm{T}\) ).

Let \(A\) be a square matrix such that \(A^{2}=O .\) Prove that \(\left(A^{\dagger}\right)^{2}=O .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.