/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Suppose \(W\) is invariant under... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose \(W\) is invariant under \(T: V \rightarrow V\). Show that \(W\) is invariant under \(f(T)\) for any polynomial \(f(t)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To show that the subspace \(W\) is invariant under any polynomial \(f(T)\) for the linear transformation \(T: V \rightarrow V\), we consider an arbitrary vector \(w \in W\). We express \(f(T)\) as a linear combination of powers of \(T\), i.e., \(f(T)w = a_0w + a_1(Tw) + a_2(T^2w) + \dots + a_n(T^nw)\). Since \(W\) is invariant under \(T\), we know that \(Tw, T^2w, \dots, T^nw \in W\). As \(W\) is closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition, any linear combination of these vectors, like \(f(T)w\), must also be in \(W\). Therefore, \(W\) is invariant under \(f(T)\).

Step by step solution

01

Recall the definition of an invariant subspace

A subspace \(W\) of a vector space \(V\) is called invariant under the linear transformation \(T: V \rightarrow V\) if for any vector \(w \in W\), the transformed vector \(Tw \in W\) as well.
02

Define a polynomial function of the linear transformation

Given a polynomial \(f(t) = a_0 + a_1t + a_2t^2 + \dots + a_nt^n\), where \(a_i\) are scalar coefficients, the polynomial function \(f(T)\) of a linear transformation \(T\) is defined as: \[f(T) = a_0I + a_1T + a_2T^2 + \dots + a_nT^n\] where \(I\) is the identity transformation and \(T^k\) (\(k=2,3,\dots,n\)) represents applying the transformation \(T\) k times consecutively.
03

Show that \(W\) is invariant under \(f(T)\)

To show that \(W\) is invariant under \(f(T)\), we need to show that for any vector \(w \in W\), its image under \(f(T)\) is still in \(W\). Let's consider an arbitrary vector \(w \in W\). We have, \[ f(T)w = (a_0I + a_1T + a_2T^2 + \dots + a_nT^n)w \] Now, apply each term of the polynomial to \(w\): \[ f(T)w = a_0(Iw) + a_1(Tw) + a_2(T^2w) + \dots + a_n(T^nw) \] Since \(w\) is in \(W\), and \(W\) is invariant under \(T\), we know that \(Tw \in W\). Since \(W\) is a subspace and closed under scalar multiplication and addition, any power of \(T\) applied to \(w\) will also be in \(W\), i.e., \(T^kw \in W\) for \(k=1,2,\dots,n\). Additionally, \(Iw = w \in W\). Therefore, any linear combination of the resulting vectors (with scalar coefficients \(a_i\)) will still be in \(W\), i.e., \[ f(T)w = a_0w + a_1(Tw) + a_2(T^2w) + \dots + a_n(T^nw) \in W \] Since \(f(T)w \in W\) for any arbitrary vector \(w \in W\), this implies that \(W\) is invariant under \(f(T)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that any two projections of the same rank are similar,

Show that any Jordan nilpotent block matrix \(N\) is similar to its transpose \(N^{T}\) (the matrix with 1 's below the diagonal and \(0^{\prime}\) s elsewhere)

Let \(V\) be the vector space of polynomials of degree \(\leq n .\) Show that the derivative operator on \(V\) is nilpotent of index \(n+1\).

Let \(W\) be the solution space of the homogeneous equation \(2 x+3 y+4 z=0 .\) Describe the cosets of \(W\) in \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\) \(W\) is a plane through the origin \(O=(0,0,0),\) and the cosets of \(W\) are the planes parallel to \(W\) Equivalently, the cosets of \(W\) are the solution sets of the family of equations \\[ 2 x+3 y+4 z=k, \quad k \in \mathbf{R} \\] In fact, the coset \(v+W\), where \(v=(a, b, c),\) is the solution set of the linear equation \\[ 2 x+3 y+4 z=2 a+3 b+4 c \quad \text { or } \quad 2(x-a)+3(y-b)+4(z-c)=0 \\]

Let \(T: V \rightarrow V\) be linear. Let \(W\) be a \(T\) -invariant subspace of \(V\) and \(\bar{T}\) the induced operator on \(V / W\). Prove (a) The T-annihilator of \(v \in V\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (b) The \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (a) The \(T\) -annihilator of \(v \in V\) is the minimal polynomial of the restriction of \(T\) to \(Z(v, T) ;\) therefore, by Problem \(10.6,\) it divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (b) The \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(\bar{T},\) which divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) by Theorem 10.16 Remark: In the case where the minimum polynomial of \(T\) is \(f(t)^{n},\) where \(f(t)\) is a monic irreducible polynomial, then the \(T\) -annihilator of \(v \in V\) and the \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) are of the form \(f(t)^{m},\) where \(m \leq n\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.