/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Let \(F\) be a continuous distri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(F\) be a continuous distribution function. For some positive \(\alpha\), define the distribution function \(G\) by $$ \bar{G}(t)=(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha} $$ Find the relationship between \(\lambda_{G}(t)\) and \(\lambda_{F}(t)\), the respective failure rate functions of \(G\) and \(F\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The relationship between the failure rate functions \(\lambda_{G}(t)\) and \(\lambda_{F}(t)\) is given by: \[ \lambda_{G}(t) = \alpha \lambda_{F}(t) \frac{(1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}}{(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha - 1}} \]

Step by step solution

01

Find the pdf of \(F\) and \(G\)

We know that the probability density function (pdf) of a distribution function can be calculated by finding its derivative with respect to time \(t\). Let's denote the pdf of \(F\) as \(f(t)\) and the pdf of \(G\) as \(g(t)\). From the exercise, the cumulative distribution function of \(G\) is given by \(\bar{G}(t)=(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha}\). First, let's find the pdf of \(G\), \(g(t)\). To do that, we need to differentiate \(\bar{G}(t)\) with respect to \(t\): \[ g(t) = \frac{d}{dt} \bar{G}(t) = \frac{d}{dt} (\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha} \] Using the chain rule, we have: \[ g(t) = \alpha (\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha-1} \frac{d}{dt} \bar{F}(t) \] Since \(\bar{F}(t) = 1 - F(t)\) and \(f(t) = \frac{d}{dt} F(t)\), we can rewrite the pdf of G as: \[ g(t) = \alpha (1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}(-f(t)) \] Now we have found the pdfs of both \(F\) and \(G\).
02

Find the failure rate functions of \(F\) and \(G\)

The failure rate function for a distribution is defined as the ratio of the pdf to the survival function, which is given by \(1 - \text{cdf}\). Let's denote the failure rate function of \(F\) by \(\lambda_{F}(t)\) and the failure rate function of \(G\) by \(\lambda_{G}(t)\). We can compute the failure rate functions for both distributions: \[ \lambda_{F}(t) = \frac{f(t)}{1 - F(t)} \] \[ \lambda_{G}(t) = \frac{g(t)}{1 - G(t)} = \frac{g(t)}{\bar{G}(t)} \] Substitute the pdf of \(G\) and the survival function of \(G\) in the equation of \(\lambda_{G}(t)\): \[ \lambda_{G}(t) = \frac{\alpha (1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}(-f(t))}{(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha}} \]
03

Find the relationship between \(\lambda_{G}(t)\) and \(\lambda_{F}(t)\)

Now we need to find the relationship between the failure rate functions of \(F\) and \(G\). Divide \(\lambda_{G}(t)\) by \(\lambda_{F}(t)\): \[ \frac{\lambda_{G}(t)}{\lambda_{F}(t)} = \frac{\alpha (1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}(-f(t))}{(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha}} \cdot \frac{1 - F(t)}{f(t)} \] Simplify the equation: \[ \frac{\lambda_{G}(t)}{\lambda_{F}(t)} = \alpha \frac{(1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}}{(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha - 1}} \] So, the relationship between the failure rate functions of \(G\) and \(F\) is given by: \[ \lambda_{G}(t) = \alpha \lambda_{F}(t) \frac{(1 - F(t))^{\alpha - 1}}{(\bar{F}(t))^{\alpha - 1}} \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a structure in which the minimal path sets are \(\\{1,2,3\\}\) and \(\\{3,4,5\\}\). (a) What are the minimal cut sets? (b) If the component lifetimes are independent uniform \((0,1)\) random variables, determine the probability that the system life will be less than \(\frac{1}{2}\).

Let \(N\) be a nonnegative, integer-valued random variable. Show that $$ P\\{N>0\\} \geqslant \frac{(E[N])^{2}}{E\left[N^{2}\right]} $$ and explain how this inequality can be used to derive additional bounds on a reliability function. Hint: $$ \begin{array}{rlr} E\left[N^{2}\right] & =E\left[N^{2} \mid N>0\right] P\\{N>0\\} & \text { (Why?) } \\ & \geqslant(E[N \mid N>0])^{2} P\\{N>0\\} & \text { (Why?) } \end{array} $$ Now multiply both sides by \(P\\{N>0\\}\)

Show that if each (independent) component of a series system has an IFR distribution, then the system lifetime is itself IFR by (a) showing that $$ \lambda_{F}(t)=\sum_{i} \lambda_{i}(t) $$ where \(\lambda_{F}(t)\) is the failure rate function of the system; and \(\lambda_{i}(t)\) the failure rate function of the lifetime of component \(i\). (b) using the definition of IFR given in Exercise 22 .

Let \(X\) denote the lifetime of an item. Suppose the item has reached the age of \(t .\) Let \(X_{t}\) denote its remaining life and define $$ \bar{F}_{t}(a)=P\left\\{X_{t}>a\right\\} $$ In words, \(\bar{F}_{t}(a)\) is the probability that a \(t\) -year old item survives an additional time \(a\). Show that (a) \(\bar{F}_{l}(a)=\bar{F}(t+a) / \bar{F}(t)\) where \(F\) is the distribution function of \(X\). (b) Another definition of IFR is to say that \(F\) is IFR if \(\bar{F}_{I}(a)\) decreases in \(t\), for all \(a\). Show that this definition is equivalent to the one given in the text when \(F\) has a density.

Compute the expected system lifetime of a three-out-of-four system when the first two component lifetimes are uniform on \((0,1)\) and the second two are uniform on \((0,2)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.