/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Wheneverthere are \(n\) customer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Wheneverthere are \(n\) customers in the system, the probability of an arrival in a small time \(h\) is \(\lambda_{n} h+o(h)\) whereas the probability of a departure is \(\mu_{n} h+o(h)\). Let the state be the number of customers in the system. (a) Write down the balance equations. (b) Show that the balance equations imply that $$ \lambda_{n} P_{n}=\mu_{n+1} P_{n+1}, \quad n \geqslant 0 $$ (c) Solve the preceding equation. [In doing so, you will discover the condition needed for a solution. Assume this condition is satisfied for part (d).] (d) If \(\mu_{n}=\mu, n \geqslant 1\) (as would be the case in a single-server model in which all service times are exponential with rate \(\mu\) ), argue (without doing any algebra) that \(\sum_{n} \lambda_{n} P_{n}=\mu\left(1-P_{0}\right)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The stationary probabilities of the queuing system can be expressed as \(P_n = P_0 \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{\lambda_k}{\mu_{k+1}}\), with \(P_0\) determined by normalizing the probabilities such that \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P_n = 1\). For a single-server model with exponential service times with rate \(\mu\), it holds that \(\sum_{n} \lambda_{n} P_{n} = \mu\left(1-P_{0}\right)\).

Step by step solution

01

Write down the balance equations

For each state n, the balance equation can be written as: $$ \lambda_{n-1} P_{n-1} + \mu_{n+1} P_{n+1} \ = \ \lambda_{n} P_{n} + \mu_{n} P_{n}, $$ with \(P_n\) representing the stationary probability of being in state n. This equation holds for all n, except for n=0, where the balance equation is: $$ \mu_{1} P_{1} \ = \ \lambda_{0} P_{0}. $$
02

Show that balance equation implies the given relationship

We need to show that $$ \lambda_{n}P_{n} = \mu_{n+1}P_{n+1}, \quad n\geqslant 0$$ Let's rewrite the balance equation from step 1: $$ \lambda_{n} P_{n} = \mu_{n+1} P_{n+1} - (\mu_{n} P_{n} - \lambda_{n-1} P_{n-1}) $$ We can see that the given relationship holds for all n, except for n=0. For n=0, we just have: $$ \lambda_0 P_0 = \mu_1 P_1, $$ which also verifies the relationship.
03

Solve the preceding equation

To solve the equation: $$ \lambda_{n}P_{n} = \mu_{n+1}P_{n+1}, \quad n\geqslant 0, $$ we can rewrite it as: $$ P_{n+1} = \frac{\lambda_n}{\mu_{n+1}} P_n, $$ for \(n \geq 0\). Now we will recursively find the stationary probabilities: $$ P_n = P_0 \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{\lambda_k}{\mu_{k+1}}, $$ where \(P_0\) is determined by normalizing the probabilities such that \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P_n = 1\). This condition determines the necessary condition for the solution: $$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P_n = P_0 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{\lambda_k}{\mu_{k+1}} = 1 $$
04

Interpret the result for single-server queueing system

For a single-server model with service times exponentially distributed with rate \(\mu\), we have \(\mu_n = \mu\) for all \(n \geq 1\). We are asked to prove that: $$ \sum_n \lambda_n P_n = \mu(1 - P_0) $$ From the relationship derived in step 2, we have \(\lambda_n P_n = \mu_{n+1} P_{n+1}\). Thus, the sum is given by: $$ \sum_n \lambda_n P_n = \sum_n \mu_{n+1} P_{n+1} = \sum_n \mu P_{n+1} $$ Since \(\mu\) is a constant, we can rewrite this sum as: $$ \mu \sum_n P_{n+1} $$ Now, let's examine the sum of all probabilities: $$ \sum_n P_n = 1 $$ Regardless of the value of n, the sum of probabilities should equal 1. Thus, we can rewrite the sum of probabilities as: $$ \sum_n P_{n+1} = 1 - P_0 $$ Finally, we obtain the required result: $$ \sum_n \lambda_n P_n = \mu \sum_n P_{n+1} = \mu (1 - P_0) $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Balance Equations
In queueing theory, balance equations play a crucial role in describing the flow of customers through a system. They represent a form of conservation laws, asserting that the rate at which customers enter a given state must equal the rate at which they leave that state. For instance, when there are n customers in the system, the inflow rate (the rate of arrivals to state n) can be expressed as λn-1 Pn-1, and the outflow rate (comprising both arrivals to state n+1 and service completions in state n) is λn Pn + μn Pn. By establishing that the inflow equals the outflow for every state, we build a system of equations that reflect the dynamic equilibrium of the queueing process.

Specifically, for a non-zero state n, the equation would look like this:\[λ_{n-1} P_{n-1} + μ_{n+1} P_{n+1} = λ_{n} P_{n} + μ_{n} P_{n},\]while for the initial state (i.e., when there are no customers in the system), we have:\[μ_1 P_1 = λ_0 P_0.\]By solving these balance equations, one can determine the stationary probabilities, thus characterizing the behavior of the queueing system over a long period.
Stationary Probability
The concept of stationary probability is foundational in queueing theory. It refers to the long-term probability that a system will be found in a particular state. For a queueing system, these probabilities reflect the likelihood of encountering a certain number of customers at any random point in time after the system has reached equilibrium. Mathematically, the stationary probability Pn of being in state n (with n customers in the system) can be derived from the balance equations.

As the system reaches a steady state, these probabilities remain constant, a condition captured by the aforementioned balance equations. To find out the stationary probability for each state in a system, the usual approach involves solving these balance equations recursively. As shown in the step-by-step solution, one can express Pn+1 as a multiple of Pn:\[P_{n+1} = \frac{λ_n}{μ_{n+1}} P_n,\]This leads to a series of probabilities that can be defined in terms of the initial state's probability P0. To ensure all probabilities add up to one (since they must cover all possible states of the system), P0 is usually found by normalizing the series.
Single-Server Queueing System
A single-server queueing system is one of the most straightforward models to understand in queueing theory. It consists of a single server that processes customers or tasks one at a time. This system is often assumed to have exponentially distributed service times, a memoryless property that simplifies analysis and calculations. In terms of the balance equations and stationary probabilities, the single-server system is often described with a constant service rate μ, regardless of the number of customers in the system.

This assumption leads to a simplified relationship between the arrival rates λn, the stationary probabilities Pn, and the constant service rate. As pointed out in the exercise, the sum of the products of arrival rates and their corresponding probabilities Σn λn Pn equals μ multiplied by the total probability of the server being busy, which is one minus the probability of the server being idle P0.\[Σ_n λ_n P_n = μ (1 - P_0)\]This elegant result allows for a relatively straightforward calculation of key performance metrics in a single-server queueing system, such as the utilization of the server, the average number of customers waiting, and the average time a customer spends in the system.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two customers move about among three servers. Upon completion of service at server \(i\), the customer leaves that server and enters service at whichever of the other two servers is free. (Therefore, there are always two busy servers.) If the service times at server \(i\) are exponential with rate \(\mu_{\ell}, i=1,2,3\), what proportion of time is server \(i\) idle?

Carloads of customers arrive at a single-server station in accordance with a Poisson process with rate 4 per hour. The service times are exponentially distributed with rate 20 per hour. If cach carload contains either 1,2 , or 3 customers with respective probabilities \(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}\) compute the average customer delay in queue.

Machines in a factory break down at an exponential rate of six per hour. There is a single repairman who fixes machines at an exponential rate of eight per hour. The cost incurred in lost production when machines are out of service is \(\$ 10\) per hour per machine. What is the average cost rate incurred due to failed machines?

Consider the priority queueing model of Section \(8.6 .2\) but now suppose that if a type 2 customer is being served when a type 1 arrives then the type 2 customer is bumped out of service. This is called the preemptive case. Suppose that when a bumped type 2 customer goes back in service his service begins at the point where it left off when he was bumped. (a) Argue that the work in the system at any time is the same as in the nonpreemptive case. (b) Derive \(W_{Q}^{1}\). Hint: How do type 2 customers affect type 1 s? (c) Why is it not true that $$ V_{Q}^{2}=\lambda_{2} E\left[S_{2}\right] W_{Q}^{2} $$ (d) Argue that the work seen by a type 2 arrival is the same as in the nonpreemptive case, and so \(W_{Q}^{2}=W_{Q}^{2}\) (nonpreemptive) \(+E\) [extra time] where the extra time is due to the fact that he may be bumped. (e) Let \(N\) denote the number of times a type 2 customer is bumped. Why is $$ E[\text { extra time } \mid N]=\frac{N E\left[S_{1}\right]}{1-\lambda_{1} E\left[S_{1}\right]} $$ Hint: When a type 2 is bumped, relate the time until he gets back in service to a "busy period." (f) Let \(S_{2}\) denote the service time of a type 2 . What is \(E\left[N \mid S_{2}\right] ?\) (g) Combine the preceding to obtain $$ W_{Q}^{2}=W_{Q}^{2} \text { (nonpreemptive) }+\frac{\lambda_{1} E\left[S_{1}\right] E\left[S_{2}\right]}{1-\lambda_{1} E\left[S_{1}\right]} $$

Consider a single-server queue with Poisson arrivals and exponential service times having the following variation: Whenever a service is completed a departure occurs only with probability \(\alpha\). With probability \(1-\alpha\) the customer, instead of leaving, joins the end of the queue. Note that a customer may be serviced more than once. (a) Set up the balance equations and solve for the steady-state probabilities, stating conditions for it to exist. (b) Find the expected waiting time of a customer from the time he arrives until he enters service for the first time. (c) What is the probability that a customer enters service exactly \(n\) times, \(n=\) \(1,2, \ldots ?\) (d) What is the expected amount of time that a customer spends in service (which does not include the time he spends waiting in line)? Use part (c). (c) What is the distribution of the total length of time a customer spends being served? 7 Is it memoryless?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.