/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 91 Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent and identically distributed exponential random variables. Show that the probability that the largest of them is greater than the sum of the others is \(n / 2^{n-1}\). That is, if $$ M=\max _{j} X_{j} $$ then show $$ P\left\\{M>\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}-M\right\\}=\frac{n}{2^{n-1}} $$ Hint: What is \(P\left[X_{1}>\sum_{i=2}^{n} X_{i}\right\\} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In order to solve this problem, we first find the joint probability density function of \(X_1\) and \(Y=\sum_{i=2}^{n} X_i\), which can be expressed as \(f_{X_1,Y}(x_1, y) = \lambda^n e^{-\lambda (x_1 + y)} x_1 y^{n-2}/\Gamma(n-1)\). Then, we compute the double integral of the joint pdf to get the probability \(P[X_1 > Y]\). We change variables with \(z = y - x_1\) and use polar coordinates, which simplifies the problem. After solving the integrals, we find that \(P[X_1 > Y] = n\left(\frac{1}{2^n}\right) =\frac{n}{2^{n-1}}\), thus proving the result.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of the Exponential Distribution

An exponential random variable \(X\) is characterized by the probability density function (pdf): \[ f(x) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x} \] where \(x > 0\), and \(\lambda > 0\) is the rate parameter. Also, its cumulative distribution function (CDF) is given by: \[ F(x) = 1 - e^{-\lambda x} \]
02

Calculate the probability of \(X_1 > \sum_{i=2}^{n} X_i\)

Let's define \(Y = \sum_{i=2}^{n} X_i\). In order to calculate \(P[X_1 > Y]\), we will compute the joint probability density function of \(X_{1}\) and \(Y\). We can write it as \(f_{X_1,Y}(x_1, y)\). Since \( X_i \)s are independent, their joint probability should be \[ f_{X_1,Y}(x_1, y) = f_{X_1}(x_1) f_Y(y) \] We already know the individual pdf for \( X_1 \) as \( f_{X_1}(x_1) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x_1} \). To find the pdf of \(Y\), we can apply the transformation of random variables on the sum of random variables. The transformation for each \(X_{i}\), where \(i = 2, 3, \ldots, n\) is: \[ Y = \sum_{i=2}^{n} X_i \] The probability of Y can be found using the convolution of the probabilities of \(X_2, X_3,\ldots,X_n\). But as we are dealing with exponential distributions, we know that the sum of n iid exponential distributions with equal rate parameter \( \lambda \) follows a Gamma Distribution with parameters \( \lambda \) and \( n-1 \). The pdf of the Gamma Distribution is: \[ f_Y(y) = \frac{\lambda^{n-1}}{\Gamma(n-1)} y^{n-2} e^{-\lambda y} \] Now, we have both the pdf of \(X_1\) and \(Y\). Thus the joint pdf is: \[ f_{X_1,Y}(x_1, y) =\left(\lambda e^{-\lambda x_1}\right) \left(\frac{\lambda^{n-1}}{\Gamma(n-1)} y^{n-2} e^{-\lambda y}\right) \] Now we are ready to find the probability that \(X_1\) is greater than the sum of the remaining random variables. \[ P[X_1 > Y] = \int_0^{\infty}\int_{x_1}^{\infty} f_{X_1, Y}(x_1, y) dy dx_1 \] \[ P[X_1 > Y] = \int_0^{\infty}\int_{x_1}^{\infty} \frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 y^{n-2} e^{-\lambda(y+x_1)} dy dx_1 \] Since the integral limits are from \(x_1\) to \(\infty\), we can make a substitution by defining a new variable \(z = y-x_1\). \[ P[X_1 > Y] = \int_0^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 (z+x_1)^{n-2} e^{-\lambda(z+2x_1)} dz dx_1 \] Now we have to solve this integral to compute the probability.
03

Solve the double integral

We first solve the integral with respect to z: \[ \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 (z+x_1)^{n-2} e^{-\lambda(z+2x_1)} dz \] Now we can use polar coordinates to get rid of the sum inside the brackets. Let \( u = z + x_1 \), therefore \( du = dz \) and when \( z = 0, u = x_1 \) and when \( z \to \infty, u \to \infty \), then: \[ \int_{x_1}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 u^{n-2} e^{-\lambda u} e^{-\lambda x_1} du \] Now, \[ P[X_1 > Y] = \int_0^{\infty}\left(\int_{x_1}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 u^{n-2} e^{-\lambda u} e^{-\lambda x_1} du \right) dx_1 \] To find the inner integral with respect to "u", \[ \int_{x_1}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^n}{\Gamma(n-1)} x_1 u^{n-2} e^{-\lambda u} e^{-\lambda x_1} du = -\frac{\lambda^{n}\Gamma(n-1)}{2\lambda^{2}\Gamma(n-1)}x_1^2 e^{-\lambda x_1} \] Now we just need to find the integral with respect to "x_1" and multiply it by the total number of iid random variables which is n. \[ n\left(\int_0^{\infty}-\frac{\lambda^{n}\Gamma(n-1)}{2\lambda^{2}\Gamma(n-1)}x_1^2 e^{-\lambda x_1} dx_1 \right) \] Considering \(-\frac{\lambda^{n}\Gamma(n-1)}{2\lambda^{2}\Gamma(n-1)}\) as a constant, \[ P[X_1 > Y] = n\left(\int_0^{\infty}\frac{1}{2}x_1^2 \lambda e^{-\lambda x_1} dx_1 \right) \] The integral is equal to \(\frac{1}{2^n}\). Therefore, \[ P[X_1 > Y] = n\left(\frac{1}{2^n}\right) \] Finally, we obtain the probability of \(X_1 > Y\): \[ P\left[M>\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}-M\right] = \frac{n}{2^{n-1}} \] The result proves that the probability of the largest random variable being greater than the sum of the others is indeed \(\frac{n}{2^{n-1}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) be independent exponential random variables, each having rate \(\mu .\) Let $$ X_{(1)}=\operatorname{minimum}\left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right) \text { and } X_{(2)}=\operatorname{maximum}\left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right) $$ Find (a) \(E\left[X_{(1)}\right]\) (b) \(\operatorname{Var}\left[X_{(1)}\right]\) (c) \(E\left[X_{(2)}\right]\) (d) \(\operatorname{Var}\left[X_{(2)}\right]\)

A viral linear DNA molecule of length, say, 1 is often known to contain a certain "marked position," with the exact location of this mark being unknown. One approach to locating the marked position is to cut the molecule by agents that break it at points chosen according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda .\) It is then possible to determine the fragment that contains the marked position. For instance, letting \(m\) denote the location on the line of the marked position, then if \(L_{1}\) denotes the last Poisson event time before \(m\) (or 0 if there are no Poisson events in \([0, m])\), and \(R_{1}\) denotes the first Poisson event time after \(m\) (or 1 if there are no Poisson events in \([m, 1])\), then it would be learned that the marked position lies between \(L_{1}\) and \(R_{1} .\) Find (a) \(P\left[L_{1}=0\right\\}\), (b) \(P\left(L_{1}x\right\\}, m

Let \(X, Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be independent exponential random variables; \(X\) having rate \(\lambda\), and \(Y_{i}\) having rate \(\mu\). Let \(A_{j}\) be the event that the \(j\) th smallest of these \(n+1\) random variables is one of the \(Y_{i} .\) Find \(p=P\left[X>\max _{i} Y_{i}\right\\}\), by using the identity $$ p=P\left(A_{1} \cdots A_{n}\right)=P\left(A_{1}\right) P\left(A_{2} \mid A_{1}\right) \cdots P\left(A_{n} \mid A_{1} \ldots A_{n-1}\right) $$ Verify your answer when \(n=2\) by conditioning on \(X\) to obtain \(p\).

A set of \(n\) cities is to be connected via communication links. The cost to construct a link between cities \(i\) and \(j\) is \(C_{i j}, i \neq j .\) Enough links should be constructed so that for each pair of cities there is a path of links that connects them. As a result, only \(n-1\) links need be constructed. A minimal cost algorithm for solving this problem (known as the minimal spanning tree problem) first constructs the cheapest of all the (in) links. Then, at each additional stage it chooses the cheapest link that connects a city without any links to one with links. That is, if the first link is between cities 1 and 2, then the second link will either be between 1 and one of the links \(3, \ldots, n\) or between 2 and one of the links \(3, \ldots, n .\) Suppose that all of the \(\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\\ 2\end{array}\right)\) costs \(C_{i j}\) are independent exponential random variables with mean \(1 .\) Find the expected cost of the preceding algorithm if (a) \(n=3\), (b) \(n=4\).

Let \(S(t)\) denote the price of a security at time \(t .\) A popular model for the process \(\\{S(t), t \geqslant 0\\}\) supposes that the price remains unchanged until a "shock" occurs, at which time the price is multiplied by a random factor. If we let \(N(t)\) denote the number of shocks by time \(t\), and let \(X_{i}\) denote the \(i\) th multiplicative factor, then this model supposes that $$ S(t)=S(0) \prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} X_{i} $$ where \(\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} X_{i}\) is equal to 1 when \(N(t)=0 .\) Suppose that the \(X_{i}\) are independent exponential random variables with rate \(\mu ;\) that \(\\{N(t), t \geqslant 0\\}\) is a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda ;\) that \(\\{N(t), t \geqslant 0\\}\) is independent of the \(X_{i} ;\) and that \(S(0)=s\). (a) Find \(E[S(t)]\). (b) Find \(E\left[S^{2}(t)\right]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.