/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be independe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be independent exponential random variables with respective rates \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\). (a) Argue that, conditional on \(X>Y\), the random variables \(\min (X, Y)\) and \(X-Y\) are independent. (b) Use part (a) to conclude that for any positive constant \(c\) $$ \begin{aligned} E[\min (X, Y) \mid X>Y+c] &=E[\min (X, Y) \mid X>Y] \\ &=E[\min (X, Y)]=\frac{1}{\lambda+\mu} \end{aligned} $$ (c) Give a verbal explanation of why \(\min (X, Y)\) and \(X-Y\) are (unconditionally) independent.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we have shown that given X>Y, the random variables min(X,Y) and X-Y are conditionally independent. We found the joint probability distribution of min(X,Y) and X-Y given X>Y, and showed that it is equal to the product of their marginal probability distributions. Using this conditional independence, we concluded that for any positive constant c, the conditional expectation E[min(X,Y) | X>Y+c] equals E[min(X,Y)] = 1/(λ+μ). Finally, we explained that the unconditional independence of min(X,Y) and X-Y is due to the fact that knowing the time until one event occurs in independent exponential random variables provides no information about the other, making their minimum and difference independent.

Step by step solution

01

Understand conditional independence

First, we need to understand what it means for two random variables to be conditionally independent. Given two random variables X and Y, they are conditionally independent given a third random variable Z if and only if the conditional probability distribution of X given Y and Z is independent of Y. In other words, P(X|Y,Z) = P(X|Z). Now, let's apply this concept to the given exercise.
02

Show conditional independence

Given that X>Y, we need to show that min(X,Y) and X-Y are independent random variables. To do this, we need to find the joint probability distribution of min(X,Y) and X-Y given X>Y, and show that it is equal to the product of their marginal probability distributions. Since X and Y are independent, their joint probability distribution is given by the product of their marginal probability distributions: \(f_{X,Y}(x,y) = f_X(x)f_Y(y) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x} \cdot \mu e^{-\mu y}\) for x>0 and y>0. Now, we need to find the joint probability distribution of min(X,Y) = Z and X-Y = W, given the condition X>Y. We can use the transformation technique for this: \(f_{Z,W|X>Y}(z,w) = \frac{f_{X,Y}(x,y)}{P(X>Y)}\Bigg \lvert \frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(z,w)} \Bigg \rvert \) where x(z,w) = z + w and y(z,w) = z. The Jacobian is given by: \(\Bigg \lvert \frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(z,w)} \Bigg \rvert = \lvert \det \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \rvert = 1\) As X and Y are independent, we know the joint distribution of X,Y: \(f_{X,Y}(x,y) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x} \mu e^{-\mu y}\) Therefore, \(f_{Z,W|X>Y}(z,w) = \frac{\lambda e^{-\lambda(z+w)} \mu e^{-\mu z}}{P(X>Y)}\)
03

Check for independence

Now, we need to check if the joint probability distribution is equal to the product of their marginal probability distributions. \(f_{Z|X>Y}(z) = \int_{w=0}^{\infty} f_{Z,W|X>Y}(z, w) dw = (\lambda+\mu)e^{-(\lambda+\mu)z}\) \(f_{W|X>Y}(w) = \int_{z=0}^{\infty} f_{Z,W|X>Y}(z, w) dz = \lambda e^{-\lambda w}\) \(f_{Z|X>Y}(z)f_{W|X>Y}(w) = (\lambda+\mu)e^{-(\lambda+\mu)z} \cdot \lambda e^{-\lambda w} = f_{Z,W|X>Y}(z, w)\) Since the joint probability distribution is equal to the product of their marginal probability distributions, min(X,Y) and X-Y are conditionally independent given X>Y.
04

Solve for conditional expectation

Using the derived conditional independence, we can solve for the given conditional expectation: \(E[\min (X, Y) \mid X>Y+c] = E[\min (X, Y) \mid X>Y] = E[\min (X, Y)]=\frac{1}{\lambda+\mu}\)
05

Verbal explanation

Verbally, the fact that min(X,Y) and X-Y are unconditionally independent can be explained as follows: The minimum of two independent exponential random variables represents the time until the first event occurs, while the difference between them represents the additional time until the second event occurs. Since both events are independent, knowing the time until one event occurs provides no information about the other, making their minimum and difference independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a conditional Poisson process in which the rate \(L\) is, as in Example \(5.29\), gamma distributed with parameters \(m\) and \(p\). Find the conditional density function of \(L\) given that \(N(t)=n\).

Satellites are launched into space at times distributed according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda .\) Each satellite independently spends a random time (having distribution \(G\) ) in space before falling to the ground. Find the probability that none of the satellites in the air at time \(t\) was launched before time s, where \(s

Let \(X, Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be independent exponential random variables; \(X\) having rate \(\lambda\), and \(Y_{i}\) having rate \(\mu\). Let \(A_{j}\) be the event that the \(j\) th smallest of these \(n+1\) random variables is one of the \(Y_{i} .\) Find \(p=P\left[X>\max _{i} Y_{i}\right\\}\), by using the identity $$ p=P\left(A_{1} \cdots A_{n}\right)=P\left(A_{1}\right) P\left(A_{2} \mid A_{1}\right) \cdots P\left(A_{n} \mid A_{1} \ldots A_{n-1}\right) $$ Verify your answer when \(n=2\) by conditioning on \(X\) to obtain \(p\).

Consider an infinite server queuing system in which customers arrive in accordance with a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda\), and where the service distribution is exponential with rate \(\mu\). Let \(X(t)\) denote the number of customers in the system at time \(t\). Find (a) \(E[X(t+s) \mid X(s)=n] ;\) (b) \(\operatorname{Var}[X(t+s) \mid X(s)=n]\). Hint: Divide the customers in the system at time \(t+s\) into two groups, one consisting of "old" customers and the other of "new" customers. (c) Consider an infinite server queuing system in which customers arrive according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda\), and where the service times are all exponential random variables with rate \(\mu .\) If there is currently a single customer in the system, find the probability that the system becomes empty when that customer departs.

Suppose that electrical shocks having random amplitudes occur at times distributed according to a Poisson process \(\\{N(t), t \geqslant 0\\}\) with rate \(\lambda .\) Suppose that the amplitudes of the successive shocks are independent both of other amplitudes and of the arrival times of shocks, and also that the amplitudes have distribution \(F\) with mean \(\mu\). Suppose also that the amplitude of a shock decreases with time at an exponential rate \(\alpha\), meaning that an initial amplitude \(A\) will have value \(A e^{-\alpha x}\) after an additional time \(x\) has elapsed. Let \(A(t)\) denote the sum of all amplitudes at time \(t\). That is, $$ A(t)=\sum_{i=1}^{N(t)} A_{i} e^{-\alpha\left(t-S_{i}\right)} $$ where \(A_{i}\) and \(S_{i}\) are the initial amplitude and the arrival time of shock \(i\). (a) Find \(E[A(t)]\) by conditioning on \(N(t)\). (b) Without any computations, explain why \(A(t)\) has the same distribution as does \(D(t)\) of Example \(5.21\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.