/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 For a branching process, calcula... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a branching process, calculate \(\pi_{0}\) when (a) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{4}, P_{2}=\frac{3}{4}\). (b) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{4}, P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}, P_{2}=\frac{1}{4}\). (c) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{6}, P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}, P_{3}=\frac{1}{3}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the given branching processes, the probabilities of extinction \(\pi_0\) are: (a) \(\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\) (b) \(\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\) (c) \(\pi_0 = \frac{1}{2}\)

Step by step solution

01

a) Calculate \(\pi_0\) for \(P_0=\frac{1}{4}\) and \(P_2=\frac{3}{4}\)

Given that \(P_0=\frac{1}{4}\) and \(P_2=\frac{3}{4}\), we can write the extinction probability as: \[\pi_0 = P_0 + P_2 \cdot \pi_0^2\] Plugging in the given probabilities: \[\pi_0 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{3}{4} \cdot \pi_0^2\] Now, we need to solve this quadratic equation to find the smallest non-negative solution for \(\pi_0\). Rewriting the equation in the standard quadratic form: \[\pi_0^2 - (4\pi_0 - 3) = 0\] Solving for \(\pi_0\), we get two possible solutions: \[\pi_0 = 1\] \[\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\] Since \(\pi_0\) represents a probability, we choose the smallest non-negative solution, thus: \[\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\]
02

b) Calculate \(\pi_0\) for \(P_0=\frac{1}{4}\), \(P_1=\frac{1}{2}\), and \(P_2=\frac{1}{4}\)

Given that \(P_0=\frac{1}{4}\), \(P_1=\frac{1}{2}\), and \(P_2=\frac{1}{4}\), we can write the extinction probability as: \[\pi_0 = P_0 + P_1\pi_0 + P_2 \cdot (\pi_0)^2\] Plugging in the given probabilities: \[\pi_0 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2}\pi_0 + \frac{1}{4}(\pi_0)^2\] Now, we need to solve this equation to find the smallest non-negative solution for \(\pi_0\). Rearranging the equation: \[(\pi_0)^2 - (4\pi_0 - 3) = 0\] Solving for \(\pi_0\), we get two possible solutions: \[\pi_0 = 1\] \[\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\] Since \(\pi_0\) represents a probability, we choose the smallest non-negative solution, thus: \[\pi_0 = \frac{3}{4}\]
03

c) Calculate \(\pi_0\) for \(P_0=\frac{1}{6}\), \(P_1=\frac{1}{2}\), and \(P_3=\frac{1}{3}\)

Given that \(P_0=\frac{1}{6}\), \(P_1=\frac{1}{2}\), and \(P_3=\frac{1}{3}\), we can write the extinction probability as: \[\pi_0 = P_0 + P_1\pi_0 + P_3 \cdot (\pi_0)^3\] Plugging in the given probabilities: \[\pi_0 = \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{2}\pi_0 + \frac{1}{3}(\pi_0)^3\] Now, we need to solve this equation to find the smallest non-negative solution for \(\pi_0\). Rearranging the equation: \[(\pi_0)^3 - (6\pi_0 - 4)(\pi_0-1) = 0\] Solving for \(\pi_0\), we get one possible solution: \[\pi_0 = \frac{1}{2}\] Thus, in this case: \[\pi_0 = \frac{1}{2}\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Probability Generating Function
In mathematical analysis, especially within probability theory, the probability generating function (PGF) is a tool that encapsulates the probabilities of a random variable into a single function. To put it simply, the PGF translates a distribution of probabilities into an equation, which we can manipulate to extract useful information about the probability distribution.

The PGF for a discrete random variable X, which represents the number of offspring in a branching process, is given by: \[G(s) = \text{E}[s^X] = \text{P}_0 + \text{P}_1s + \text{P}_2s^2 + \text{P}_3s^3 + \text{...},\] where \text{P}_i represents the probability of exactly i offspring and \(s\) is an indeterminate. The coefficients (\(\text{P}_i\) values) in the function are the probabilities of having a certain number of offspring, and the power of \(s\) indicates the number of offspring in each term.

For students, mastering the PGF is crucial as it serves as the basis for more complex calculations, including the extinction probability of the branching process. By analyzing the PGF, one can derive equations relevant for finding \text{probabilities of interest}, often involving taking derivatives or solving equations involving the PGF, as shown in the steps of our example exercise.
Calculation of Extinction Probability
The extinction probability calculation refers to finding the probability that a branching process eventually dies out, meaning that there are no individuals left in some generation. The extinction probability is denoted by \(\pi_0\) and can be found by setting the PGF equal to \(s\), as this represents the scenario where the population does not grow.

To find the extinction probability in a branching process, we use the PGF and look for the smallest non-negative root of the equation \(G(s) = s\). This is because we are interested in the likelihood that the process ceases to exist over time. For cases where there is a finite number of offspring possibilities, we may arrive at a polynomial equation in \(s\), which we can solve, as shown in the exercise. The tricky part sometimes can be discerning which root of the polynomial is the actual extinction probability, as we always select the smallest non-negative solution since probabilities cannot exceed 1.

Improvement from the exercise:

  • To refine understanding, practice setting up and solving different PGF equations for various distributions of offspring.
  • Engage in comparative study by analyzing the extinction probabilities under various scenarios and observing the impact of different distribution parameters on the extinction probability.
Analyzing Branching Processes
A branching process analysis involves evaluating the behavior of a population where each individual in one generation produces a certain number of offspring independently to form the next generation. These models are particularly useful in fields like biology, epidemiology, and family lineage studies.

To analyze a branching process, we typically calculate the expected number of offspring (also referred to as the mean or average reproduction rate) and the extinction probability. These metrics tell us whether the population is expected to grow, remain stable, or decline over time. This is crucial for making projections about future populations or understanding the spread of characteristics within a population.

Exercise Improvement Advice:

  • Illustrate the branching process with diagrams, showing the possible outcomes at each generation. This visual aid helps in internalizing the concept.
  • Develop a deeper understanding of PGF's role in branching processes by exploring scenarios where reproduction rates vary and analyzing how this affects the extinction probability and overall population trends.
  • Encourage the use of computational tools for solving complex PGFs or for simulating branching processes to visualize long-term trends and extinction scenarios.
  • Compare the analytical solutions with simulation results to reinforce concepts and validate understanding.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A group of \(n\) processors is arranged in an ordered list. When a job arrives, the first processor in line attempts it; if it is unsuccessful, then the next in line tries it; if it too is unsuccessful, then the next in line tries it, and so on. When the job is successfully processed or after all processors have been unsuccessful, the job leaves the system. At this point we are allowed to reorder the processors, and a new job appears. Suppose that we use the one- closer reordering rule, which moves the processor that was successful one closer to the front of the line by interchanging its position with the one in front of it. If all processors were unsuccessful (or if the processor in the first position was successful), then the ordering remains the same. Suppose that each time processor \(i\) attempts a job then, independently of anything else, it is successful with probability \(p_{i}\). (a) Define an appropriate Markov chain to analyze this model. (b) Show that this Markov chain is time reversible. (c) Find the long-run probabilities.

Coin 1 comes up heads with probability \(0.6\) and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) with probability \(0.5 . \mathrm{A}\) coin is continually flipped until it comes up tails, at which time that coin is put aside and we start flipping the other one. (a) What proportion of flips use coin 1? (b) If we start the process with \(\operatorname{coin} 1\) what is the probability that \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) is used on the fifth flip?

A taxi driver provides service in two zones of a city. Fares picked up in zone \(A\) will have destinations in zone \(A\) with probability \(0.6\) or in zone \(B\) with probability \(0.4\). Fares picked up in zone \(B\) will have destinations in zone \(A\) with probability \(0.3\) or in zone \(B\) with probability \(0.7 .\) The driver's expected profit for a trip entirely in zone \(A\) is 6 ; for a trip entirely in zone \(B\) is \(8 ;\) and for a trip that involves both zones is 12 . Find the taxi driver's average profit per trip.

Let \(P^{(1)}\) and \(P^{(2)}\) denote transition probability matrices for ergodic Markov chains having the same state space. Let \(\pi^{1}\) and \(\pi^{2}\) denote the stationary (limiting) probability vectors for the two chains. Consider a process defined as follows: (a) \(X_{0}=1 .\) A coin is then flipped and if it comes up heads, then the remaining states \(X_{1}, \ldots\) are obtained from the transition probability matrix \(P^{(1)}\) and if tails from the matrix \(P^{(2)} .\) Is \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) a Markov chain? If \(p=\) \(P\left\\{\right.\) coin comes up heads\\}, what is \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} P\left(X_{n}=i\right) ?\) (b) \(X_{0}=1\). At each stage the coin is flipped and if it comes up heads, then the next state is chosen according to \(P^{(1)}\) and if tails comes up, then it is chosen according to \(P^{(2)} .\) In this case do the successive states constitute a Markov chain? If so, determine the transition probabilities. Show by a counterexample that the limiting probabilities are not the same as in part (a).

Let \(A\) be a set of states, and let \(A^{c}\) be the remaining states. (a) What is the interpretation of $$ \sum_{i \in A} \sum_{j \in A^{c}} \pi_{i} P_{i j} ? $$ (b) What is the interpretation of $$ \sum_{i \in A^{e}} \sum_{j \in A} \pi_{i} P_{i j} ? $$ (c) Explain the identity $$ \sum_{i \in A} \sum_{j \in A^{c}} \pi_{i} P_{i j}=\sum_{i \in A^{c}} \sum_{j \in A} \pi_{i} P_{i j} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.