/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 For a Markov chain \(\left\\{X_{... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a Markov chain \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) with transition probabilities \(P_{i, j}\), consider the conditional probability that \(X_{n}=m\) given that the chain started at time 0 in state \(i\) and has not yet entered state \(r\) by time \(n\), where \(r\) is a specified state not equal to either \(i\) or \(m .\) We are interested in whether this conditional probability is equal to the \(n\) stage transition probability of a Markov chain whose state space does not include state \(r\) and whose transition probabilities are $$ Q_{i, j}=\frac{P_{i, j}}{1-P_{i, r}}, \quad i, j \neq r $$ Either prove the equality $$ P\left\\{X_{n}=m \mid X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\}=Q_{i, m}^{n} $$ or construct a counterexample.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We have proven that for a Markov chain \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) with transition probabilities \(P_{i, j}\), the conditional probability that \(X_{n}=m\) given that the chain started at time \(0\) in state \(i\) and has not yet entered state \(r\) by time \(n\) is equal to the \(n\) stage transition probability in a Markov chain without state \(r\) and with transition probabilities \(Q_{i, j}=\frac{P_{i, j}}{1-P_{i, r}}, \quad i, j \neq r\): \[P\left\\{X_{n}=m | X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\}=Q_{i, m}^n\]

Step by step solution

01

Understand the problem statement

We are given a Markov chain \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) with transition probabilities \(P_{i, j}\). Our objective is to compute the conditional probability that \(X_{n}=m\) under the condition that \(X_0 = i\) and \(X_k \neq r\) for all \(k=1,\dots,n\), where \(r\) is a specified state not equal to either \(i\) or \(m\).
02

Analyze the new transition probabilities

We are considering a new Markov chain of the form: \[Q_{i, j}=\frac{P_{i, j}}{1-P_{i, r}}, \quad i, j \neq r\] The new transition probabilities are the probabilities of transitioning from state \(i\) to state \(j\) not including the specified state \(r\).
03

Prove the equality

Consider the path of length \(n\) that goes from state \(i\) to state \(m\) without passing through state \(r\). Since the chain is in state \(i\) at time \(0\) and in state \(m\) at time \(n\), and it doesn't enter state \(r\) during the times \(1, \ldots n\), we can express the conditional probability of interest as follows: \[P\left\\{X_{n}=m | X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\} = \frac{P\left\\{X_{n}=m, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n-1 |X_{0}=i\right\\}}{P\left\\{X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n | X_{0}=i \right\\}}\] Now consider the transition probabilities from state \(i\) to states different than \(r\). We can write those probabilities as follows: \[Q_{i, j} = \frac{P_{i, j}}{1 - P_{i, r}}, \quad i, j \neq r\] By multiplying both the numerator and denominator of the conditional probability by \((1-P_{i,r})^n\), we get: \[P\left\\{X_{n}=m | X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\} = \frac{P\left\\{X_{n}=m, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n-1 |X_{0}=i\right\\}(1-P_{i,r})^n}{P\left\\{X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n | X_{0}=i \right\\}(1-P_{i,r})^n}\] In this form, the numerator and denominator of the conditional probability are expressed as products of probabilities of transitioning from state \(i\) to states different than \(r\). Hence, the numerator and denominator of the conditional probability have the same form as the definition of the new transition probabilities. Therefore, we can use the definition of the new transition probabilities to write the conditional probability in terms of the \(Q_{i, j}\)s: \[P\left\\{X_{n}=m | X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\} = Q_{i, m}^n\] So the equality is proven: \[P\left\\{X_{n}=m | X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\}=Q_{i, m}^n\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Probability
In the context of a Markov Chain, conditional probability is a key concept. It allows us to determine the likelihood of an event given that another event has already occurred. In this specific exercise, we are asked to find the probability that the Markov chain is in state \(m\) at time \(n\), **given** that it began in state \(i\) at time 0, and has avoided a particular state \(r\) throughout the times from 1 to \(n-1\). This is a classic conditional probability setup, where an existing condition (not passing through state \(r\)) affects the outcome of interest (reaching state \(m\) at time \(n\)).
To express this formally, we use the notation:
  • \(P(X_{n}=m \mid X_{0}=i, X_{k} eq r, \text{for } k=1,\ldots,n)\)
This notation reads as the probability that the Markov chain is in state \(m\) at step \(n\), given it started in \(i\) and did not reach state \(r\) in between.
This conditional aspect is fundamental because it shows how the presence or absence of certain states (like \(r\)) can restrict or influence the chain's behavior.
Transition Probabilities
Transition probabilities are the backbone of any Markov Chain. They represent the probability of moving from one state to another. For a Markov Chain, these probabilities are usually organized in a matrix where each element, \(P_{i,j}\), indicates the likelihood of transitioning from state \(i\) to state \(j\) in one step.
In this exercise, however, things are a little more intricate. We introduce a modified version of transition probabilities, denoted \(Q_{i,j}\). Here, \(Q_{i,j}\) is adjusted to account for the condition that state \(r\) is never visited. This adjustment is given by:
  • \(Q_{i, j}=\frac{P_{i,j}}{1-P_{i, r}}, i, j eq r\)
This formula modifies the regular transition probabilities by effectively discounting the chances of entering state \(r\). As a result, transition probabilities are scaled in accordance with the avoidance of the specified state.
This approach ensures that the entire probability mass from \(P_{i,j}\), which was previously directed towards state \(r\), is redistributed among the other states.
State Space
The state space of a Markov Chain is a comprehensive list of all possible states the chain can be in. It forms the basis upon which the transition probabilities operate. Each state represents a possible status or condition in which the Markov Chain might find itself at any point in time.
It’s important to understand how excluding a state alters this space. In the context of the given exercise, we extended the state space concept through the idea of **conditional exclusion**. By removing state \(r\) from our consideration, we're redefining what we consider to be the available states. This modified state space excludes \(r\), causing us to reconsider our calculation of transition probabilities and resulting in the need to use adjusted transition probabilities \(Q_{i, j}\) which don't include \(r\).
This modified understanding of state space allows us to redefine the pathway the Markov Chain can follow, by essentially removing certain paths and thus affecting the overall dynamics of the chain.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let the transition probability matrix of a two-state Markov chain be given, as in Example 4.2, by $$ \mathbf{P}=\left\|\begin{array}{cc} p & 1-p \\ 1-p & p \end{array}\right\| $$ Show by mathematical induction that $$ \mathbf{P}^{(n)}=\left\|\begin{array}{|ll} \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} & \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} \\ \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} & \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} \end{array}\right\| $$

Find the average premium received per policyholder of the insurance company of Example \(4.27\) if \(\lambda=1 / 4\) for one-third of its clients, and \(\lambda=1 / 2\) for two-thirds of its clients.

Each morning an individual leaves his house and goes for a run. He is equally likely to leave either from his front or back door. Upon leaving the house, he chooses a pair of running shoes (or goes running barefoot if there are no shoes at the door from which he departed). On his return he is equally likely to enter, and leave his running shoes, either by the front or back door. If he owns a total of \(k\) pairs of running shoes, what proportion of the time does he run barefooted?

Suppose that a population consists of a fixed number, say, \(m\), of genes in any generation. Each gene is one of two possible genetic types. If exactly \(i\) (of the \(m\) ) genes of any generation are of type 1 , then the next generation will have \(j\) type 1 (and \(m-j\) type 2 ) genes with probability $$ \left(\begin{array}{c} m \\ j \end{array}\right)\left(\frac{i}{m}\right)^{j}\left(\frac{m-i}{m}\right)^{m-j}, \quad j=0,1, \ldots, m $$ Let \(X_{n}\) denote the number of type 1 genes in the \(n\) th generation, and assume that \(X_{0}=i\) (a) Find \(E\left[X_{n}\right]\). (b) What is the probability that eventually all the genes will be type \(1 ?\)

Coin 1 comes up heads with probability \(0.6\) and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) with probability \(0.5 . \mathrm{A}\) coin is continually flipped until it comes up tails, at which time that coin is put aside and we start flipping the other one. (a) What proportion of flips use coin 1? (b) If we start the process with \(\operatorname{coin} 1\) what is the probability that \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) is used on the fifth flip?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.