/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 A chemical reaction converts a c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A chemical reaction converts a certain chemical into another chemical, and the rate at which the first chemical is converted is proportional to the amount of this chemical present at any time. At the end of one hour, \(50 \mathrm{gm}\) of the first chemical remain; while at the end of three hours, only \(25 \mathrm{gm}\) remain. (a) How many grams of the first chemical were present initially? (b) How many grams of the first chemical will remain at the end of five hours? (c) In how many hours will only \(2 \mathrm{gm}\) of the first chemical remain?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Initially, there were \(50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}}\) grams of the first chemical. (b) After 5 hours, only \(\frac{50}{32}\) grams of the first chemical will remain. (c) When only 2 grams of the chemical remain, approximately \(\displaystyle 1 + \frac{2 \ln\frac{1}{5}}{\ln 2}\) hours will have elapsed.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the differential equation

Since we are given that the rate of change is proportional to the amount present at any time, we can write that as a differential equation. Let x(t) be the amount of the first chemical present at time t, and k be the constant of proportionality. We can then write the differential equation as: \[\frac{dx}{dt} = -kx(t)\] We have a negative sign in the equation because the amount of the chemical is decreasing over time.
02

Solve the differential equation

Integration can be used to solve the differential equation. Divide both sides of the equation by x(t) and integrate both sides with respect to t: \[\int \frac{1}{x(t)}dx(t) = -k \int dt\] After integrating, we obtain: \[\ln|x(t)| = -kt + C\] Exponentiating both sides: \[x(t) = e^{-kt + C}\] which, after rearranging, can be written as: \[x(t)= A e^{-kt}\] where \(A= e^C\).
03

Use initial conditions to find k and A

Using the given data, we have two conditions: x(1)=50 and x(3)=25. Plugging these into our equation, we can solve for k and A: For \(x(1)=50\), we have: \[50 = A e^{-k}\] For \(x(3)=25\), we have: \[25 = A e^{-3k}\] Dividing the second equation by the first equation, and simplifying, we find: \[\frac{1}{2} = e^{-2k}\] Taking the natural logarithm of both sides: \[-\ln 2 = -2k\] Now, we can find the value of k: \[k = \frac{\ln 2}{2}\] Substituting the value of k into the first equation: \[50 = A e^{-\frac{\ln 2}{2}}\] Solving for A, we obtain: \[A = 50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}}\]
04

Answer the questions

(a) To find the initial amount x(0), we substitute t=0 into the equation and solve for x(0): \[x(0) = A e^{0} = 50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}}\] So, initially, there were \(50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}}\) grams of the first chemical. (b) To find the amount of chemical remaining after 5 hours, we substitute t=5 into the equation: \[x(5) = 50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}} e^{-5\frac{\ln 2}{2}} = 50 \cdot \frac{1}{32}\] So, after 5 hours, only \(\frac{50}{32}\) grams of the first chemical will remain. (c) To find the time t when only 2 grams of the chemical remain, we substitute x(t)=2 into the equation and solve for t: \[2 = 50 e^{\frac{\ln 2}{2}} e^{-k t}\] Dividing both sides by 50, we get: \[\frac{1}{25} = e^{-\frac{\ln 2}{2} (1-t)}\] Taking the natural logarithm of both sides: \[\ln \frac{1}{25} = -\frac{\ln 2}{2} (1-t)\] Now, we solve for t: \[t = 1 + \frac{2\ln\frac{1}{5}}{\ln 2}\] When only 2 grams of the chemical remain, approximately \(\displaystyle 1 + \frac{2 \ln\frac{1}{5}}{\ln 2}\) hours will have elapsed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that the rate at which radioactive nuclei decay is proportional to the number of such nuclei that are present in a given sample. In a certain sample \(10 \%\) of the original number of radioactive nuclei have undergone disintegration in a period of 100 years. (a) What percentage of the original radioactive nuclei will remain after 1000 years? (b) In how many years will only one-fourth of the original number remain?

A large tank initially contains 100 gal of brine in which \(10 \mathrm{lb}\) of salt is dissolved. Starting at \(t=0\), pure water flows into the tank at the rate of 5 gal/min. The mixture is kept uniform by stirring and the well- stirred mixture simultaneously flows out at the slower rate of \(2 \mathrm{gal} / \mathrm{min} .\) (a) How much salt is in the tank at the end of \(15 \mathrm{~min}\) and what is the concentration at that time? (b) If the capacity of the tank is 250 gal, what is the concentration at the instant the tank overflows?

Assume that the rate of change of the human population of the earth is proportional to the number of people on earth at any time, and suppose that this population is increasing at the rate of \(2 \%\) per year. The 1979 World Almanac gives the 1978 world population estimate as 4219 million; assume this figure is in fact correct. (a) Using this data, express the human population of the earth as a function of time. (b) According to the formula of part (a), what was the population of the earth in \(1950 ?\) The 1979 World Almanac gives the 1950 world population estimate as 2510 million. Assuming this estimate is very nearly correct, comment on the accuracy of the formula of part (a) in checking such past populations. (c) According to the formula of part (a), what will be the population of the earth in 2000? Does this seem reasonable? (d) According to the formula of part (a), what was the population of the earth in \(1900 ?\) The 1970 World Almanac gives the 1900 world population estimate as 1600 million. Assuming this estimate is very nearly correct, comment on the accuracy of the formula of part (a) in checking such past populations. (e) According to the formula of part (a), what will be the population of the earth in 2100 ? Does this seem reasonable?

In Exercises \(1-9\) find the orthogonal trajectories of each given family of curves. In each case sketch several members of the family and several of the orthogonal trajectories on the same set of axes. $$ y=c x^{3}. $$

A boy goes sledding down a long \(30^{\circ}\) slope. The combined weight of the boy and his sled is \(72 \mathrm{lb}\) and the air resistance (in pounds) is numerically equal to twice their velocity (in feet per second). If they started from rest and their velocity at the end of \(5 \mathrm{sec}\) is \(10 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{sec}\), what is the coefficient of friction of the sled runners on the snow?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.