/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 The textbook you need to buy for... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The textbook you need to buy for your chemistry class is expensive at the college bookstore, so you consider buying it on Ebay instead. A look at past auctions suggest that the prices of that chemistry textbook have an approximately normal distribution with mean \(\$ 89\) and standard deviation \(\$ 15\). (a) What is the probability that a randomly selected auction for this book closes at more than \(\$ 100 ?\) (b) Ebay allows you to set your maximum bid price so that if someone outbids you on an auction you can automatically outbid them, up to the maximum bid price you set. If you are only bidding on one auction, what are the advantages and disadvantages of setting a bid price too high or too low? What if you are bidding on multiple auctions? (c) If you watched 10 auctions, roughly what percentile might you use for a maximum bid cutoff to be somewhat sure that you will win one of these ten auctions? Is it possible to find a cutoff point that will ensure that you win an auction? (d) If you are willing to track up to ten auctions closely, about what price might you use as your maximum bid price if you want to be somewhat sure that you will buy one of these ten books?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Probability is about 23.3%. (c) Use the 90th percentile, $108.2, but winning isn't guaranteed.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We're dealing with a normal distribution problem where auction prices for a textbook are normally distributed with a mean of $89 and a standard deviation of $15. We need to find the probability of prices exceeding $100.
02

Standardizing the Value

To find the probability of an auction closing at more than \(100, we convert \)100 to a z-score using the formula: \( z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} \), where \( X = 100 \), \( \mu = 89 \), and \( \sigma = 15 \).
03

Calculate the Z-Score

Substitute the values into the formula: \( z = \frac{100 - 89}{15} = \frac{11}{15} \approx 0.73 \).
04

Probability Calculation

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, find the probability of \( z > 0.73 \). This corresponds to \( 1 - P(Z < 0.73) \approx 0.233 \). So, the probability that an auction closes above $100 is approximately 23.3%.
05

Analyze Bid Price Strategies

Setting a bid too high can result in overpaying; setting it too low might mean missing out on winning any auctions. With multiple auctions, a higher maximum bid increases the probability of winning but at a riskier price.
06

Determine Percentile for Winning

For 10 auctions, you might consider using around the 90th percentile as your maximum bid to be 'somewhat sure' to win one, but there is no guarantee of winning due to variability in auction results. The 90th percentile can be found using the formula: \( P(Z < x) = 0.9 \).
07

Calculate Desired Maximum Bid Price

If \( Z \approx 1.28 \) for the 90th percentile, use \( X = \mu + Z\sigma = 89 + 1.28 \times 15 \approx 108.2 \). Your bid price might be around $108.2 to increase the likelihood of winning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Z-score
The concept of a Z-score is a fundamental topic in statistics, particularly in the context of normal distribution. A Z-score essentially tells us how many standard deviations an element is from the mean. For our problem, we're trying to find out the probability that an auction exceeds \(100.
This involves standardizing our auction price using the Z-score formula:
  • \( z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} \)
where:
  • \( X \) is the value of interest (in this case, \)100),
  • \( \mu \) is the mean (\(89),
  • \( \sigma \) is the standard deviation (\)15).
Substituting these into the formula gives us a Z-score of approximately 0.73.
This number provides a way for us to move to the next step: determining how likely it is for this event to occur by looking it up in a standard normal distribution table.
The Z-score helps us compare our situation to a standard normal distribution and thus enables us to calculate probabilities.
Probability Calculation
After determining the Z-score, we move to probability calculation. This step involves finding out the likelihood of the auction price exceeding \(100.
Using Z-score tables or statistical software, we find the probability for our calculated Z-score of 0.73. Essentially, we are looking for:
  • \( P(Z > 0.73) \)
This is equivalent to:
  • \( 1 - P(Z < 0.73) \approx 0.233 \)
meaning there is about a 23.3% chance that the auction price will exceed \)100.
This probability tells us how realistic it is to expect prices above a certain threshold and plays a crucial role in decision-making strategies, as it informs the buyer about the chances of encountering higher-priced auctions.
Auction Strategies
In an auction scenario like the one described, understanding the strategy behind your bids is key. One common strategy is manipulating your bid to increase the chances of winning without overpaying.
When setting a bid price, several factors come into play:
  • A very high bid might ensure a win, but you could overpay significantly, especially if other bids are lower. This is not ideal for single auctions.
  • A very low bid could result in losing the auction, which isn't beneficial if you need the item.
  • If participating in multiple auctions, setting a higher bid may enhance your chances of success across the board but comes with the risk of higher final costs.
For someone watching several auctions, calculating the 90th percentile could be advisable to be 'somewhat sure' of winning one.
This requires understanding auction variability and deciding on a bid price that sits comfortably within your financial limits.
For instance, a 90th percentile with a bid at about $108.2 provides a balance, offering a reasonable chance of winning while controlling potential overbidding.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Below are heights of 25 female college students. The mean height is 61.52 inches with a standard deviation of 4.58 inches. Use this information to determine if the heights approximately follow the \(68-95-99.7 \%\) Rule.

Suppose weights of the checked baggage of airline passengers follow a nearly normal distribution with mean 45 pounds and standard deviation 3.2 pounds. Most airlines charge a fee for baggage that weigh in excess of 50 pounds. Determine what percent of airline passengers incur this fee.

The distribution of passenger vehicle speeds traveling on the Interstate 5 Freeway (I-5) in California is nearly normal with a mean of 72.6 miles/hour and a standard deviation of 4.78 miles/hour. \(^{56}\) (a) What percent of passenger vehicles travel slower than 80 miles/hour? (b) What percent of passenger vehicles travel between 60 and 80 miles/hour? (c) How fast do the fastest \(5 \%\) of passenger vehicles travel? (d) The speed limit on this stretch of the I-5 is 70 miles/hour. Approximate what percentage of the passenger vehicles travel above the speed limit on this stretch of the I-5.

Rosiglitazone is the active ingredient in the controversial type 2 diabetes medicine Avandia and has been linked to an increased risk of serious cardiovascular problems such as stroke, heart failure, and death. A common alternative treatment is pioglitazone, the active ingredient in a diabetes medicine called Actos. In a nationwide retrospective observational study of 227,571 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older, it was found that 2,593 of the 67,593 patients using rosiglitazone and 5,386 of the 159,978 using pioglitazone had serious cardiovascular problems. These data are summarized in the contingency table below. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Treatment }\\\ &\begin{array}{lccc} & {\text { Cardiovascular problems }} & \\ { 2 - 3 } & \text { Yes } & \text { No } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Rosiglitazone } & 2,593 & 65,000 & 67,593 \\ \text { Pioglitazone } & 5,386 & 154,592 & 159,978 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 7,979 & 219,592 & 227,571 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ Determine if each of the following statements is true or false. If false, explain why. Be careful: The reasoning may be wrong even if the statement's conclusion is correct. In such cases, the statement should be considered false. (a) Since more patients on pioglitazone had cardiovascular problems \((5,386\) vs. 2,593\(),\) we can conclude that the rate of cardiovascular problems for those on a pioglitazone treatment is higher. (b) The data suggest that diabetic patients who are taking rosiglitazone are more likely to have cardiovascular problems since the rate of incidence was \((2,593 / 67,593=0.038) 3.8 \%\) for patients on this treatment, while it was only \((5,386 / 159,978=0.034) 3.4 \%\) for patients on pioglitazone. (c) The fact that the rate of incidence is higher for the rosiglitazone group proves that rosiglitazone causes serious cardiovascular problems. (d) Based on the information provided so far, we cannot tell if the difference between the rates of incidences is due to a relationship between the two variables or due to chance.

A college senior who took the Graduate Record Examination exam scored 620 on the Verbal Reasoning section and 670 on the Quantitative Reasoning section. The mean score for Verbal Reasoning section was 462 with a standard deviation of \(119,\) and the mean score for the Quantitative Reasoning was 584 with a standard deviation of 151. Suppose that both distributions are nearly normal. (a) Write down the short-hand for these two normal distributions. (b) What is her \(\mathrm{Z}\) score on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? Draw a standard normal distribution curve and mark these two Z scores. (c) What do these \(Z\) scores tell you? (d) Relative to others, which section did she do better on? (e) Find her percentile scores for the two exams. (f) What percent of the test takers did better than her on the Verbal Reasoning section? On the Quantitative Reasoning section? (g) Explain why simply comparing her raw scores from the two sections would lead to the incorrect conclusion that she did better on the Quantitative Reasoning section. (h) If the distributions of the scores on these exams are not nearly normal, would your answers to parts (b) - (f) change? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.