/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 If there is a positive correlati... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If there is a positive correlation between number of years studying math and shoe size (for children), does that prove that larger shoes cause more studying of math or vice versa? Can you think of a confounding variable that might be influencing both of the other variables?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, a positive correlation does not prove that larger shoes cause more studying of math or vice versa. A confounding variable might be age, as both shoe size and years of education would naturally increase as a child grows older.

Step by step solution

01

Interpretation of Correlation

The positive correlation between number of years studying math and shoe size does not prove causation. It simply means that as the number of years studying math increases, so does shoe size. However, this does not necessarily mean that one causes the other.
02

Understanding Causation

To establish causation, it must be proven that varying the one variable (e.g. shoe size) will always result in a variation in the other variable (e.g. years of studying math), excluding all other possible factors. Given the nature of the variables at hand, it is quite impossible to prove such a causation between shoe size and studying of math.
03

Identifying a Confounding Variable

A confounding variable could be age. As children grow older, their shoe size typically increases, and they also have more years of education including studying math.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confounding Variables
In statistics and research, confounding variables are often the hidden influencing factors that cause a false appearance of correlation or association between other variables. These variables can inadvertently affect the studied variables and lead to incorrect conclusions.
For instance, in the given scenario of a correlation between years of studying math and shoe size, age acts as a confounding variable. As children grow older, both their shoe size increases and the number of years they have studied math increases, which can create a misleading impression that the two are directly related.
To handle confounding variables, researchers can use statistical methods like stratification or multivariable regression analysis to isolate the true effects of the variables being studied. By accounting for these confounders, they can arrive at more accurate conclusions.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is the process of collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data to uncover patterns and trends. It plays a crucial role in determining the relationship between variables and understanding whether a causal link exists or if the observed relationship is merely correlative.
In our example, statistical analysis would help clarify that while there might be a positive correlation between shoe size and years of math study, this does not imply causation. Techniques like correlation coefficients can quantify the relationship but should be interpreted with caution.
  • Correlation Coefficient: Measures the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables.
  • Regression Analysis: Helps control confounding variables, providing a clearer picture of the actual relationship.
By using statistical tools, researchers can ensure that their findings reflect true associations and not spurious correlations.
Educational Research
Educational research aims to enhance educators' understanding of learning processes, instructional techniques, and educational outcomes. It employs both qualitative and quantitative methods to explore aspects of education including learning behaviors, teaching methods, and the impact of educational policies.
In the context of our example, educational researchers might explore how various factors such as age, cognitive development, and learning environments contribute to students' academic performance rather than attributing changes to unrelated variables like shoe size.
By being aware of confounding variables and employing rigorous statistical analyses, educational research can offer deep insights, leading to evidence-based practices that improve learning outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

United Press International published an article with the headline "Study Finds Correlation between Education, Life Expectancy." Would you expect this correlation to be negative or positive? Explain your reasoning in the context of this headline.

Investing Some investors use a technique called the "Dogs of the Dow" to invest. They pick several stocks that are performing poorly from the Dow Jones group (which is a composite of 30 wellknown stocks) and invest in these. Explain why these stocks will probably do better than they have done before.

Construct a small set of numbers with at least three points with a perfect negative correlation of \(-1.00\).

The following table gives the number of millionaires (in thousands) and the population (in hundreds of thousands) for the states in the northeastern region of the United States in 2008 . The numbers of millionaires come from Forbes Magazine in March 2007 . a. Without doing any calculations, predict whether the correlation and slope will be positive or negative. Explain your prediction. b. Make a scatterplot with the population (in hundreds of thousands) on the \(x\) -axis and the number of millionaires (in thousands) on the \(y\) -axis. Was your prediction correct? c. Find the numerical value for the correlation. d. Find the value of the slope and explain what it means in context. Be careful with the units. e. Explain why interpreting the value for the intercept does not make sense in this situation. \(\begin{array}{lcc} \text { State } & \text { Millionaires } & \text { Population } \\ \hline \text { Connecticut } & 86 & 35 \\ \hline \text { Delaware } & 18 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Maine } & 22 & 13 \\ \hline \text { Massachusetts } & 141 & 64 \\ \hline \text { New Hampshire } & 26 & 13 \\ \hline \text { New Jersey } & 207 & 87 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 368 & 193 \\ \hline \text { Pennsylvania } & 228 & 124 \\ \hline \text { Rhode Island } & 20 & 11 \\ \hline \text { Vermont } & 11 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array}\)

In Exercise \(4.1\) there is a graph of the relationship between SAT score and college GPA. SAT score was the predictor and college GPA was the response variable. If you reverse the variables so that college GPA was the predictor and SAT score was the response variable, what effect would this have on the numerical value of the correlation coefficient?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.