/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The correlation between house pr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The correlation between house price (in dollars) and area of the house (in square feet) for some houses is 0.91. If you found the correlation between house price in thousands of dollars and area in square feet for the same houses, what would the correlation be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation would remain the same, at 0.91, even when the house price is represented in thousands of dollars.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the nature of correlation

First, it’s important to note that correlation measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. A positive correlation (closer to +1) refers to a strong positive relationship between variables, which indicates that when one variable increases, the other does too and vice versa.
02

Consider the changes in variables

Here the house price is being changed from dollars to thousands of dollars, which is a scale change. However, the area of the house remains in square feet.
03

Evaluate the correlation

Correlation remains unaffected by linear transformations (i.e., transformations that don’t change the basic shape of the variable’s distribution). Hence, even when the scale of house prices changes from dollars to thousands of dollars, the correlation between the house price and the area stays the same, at 0.91.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation
Correlation is a statistical tool that helps us understand the relationship between two variables. It's expressed as a correlation coefficient, a value ranging from -1 to 1. These numbers give us an idea of how closely related the two variables are.
When we say the correlation between house prices and their sizes is 0.91, it indicates a strong positive relationship. As the area of a house increases, the price tends to increase as well, and vice versa.
Correlation doesn't just show if variables are related, but also how they move with respect to each other. A positive correlation means they move in the same direction, while a negative one means they move in opposite directions. If the correlation is zero, it indicates no linear relationship between the variables.
Linear relationships
Linear relationships occur when there is a direct proportionality between two variables. In simpler terms, if one variable changes, the other changes in a predictable pattern.
Graphically, this can be represented as a straight line. For example, plotting house prices against their sizes on a graph, if they have a linear relationship, the dots would align closely around a straight line.
  • If the correlation is close to 1, the line would have a positive slope.
  • If it is negative, the slope would be downward.
In our exercise, a correlation of 0.91 suggests a very strong linear relationship, implying that for every unit increase in the house size, the price increases in a quite predictable manner.
Data transformation
Data transformation involves changing the format or scale of the data to make it easier to analyze. It doesn't change the actual content or relationship within the data but often adjusts how we view it.
When we talk about the transformation from dollars to thousands of dollars, this is a linear transformation. The core data remains consistent, only the scale viewed or understood by us changes.
Linear transformations, such as changing dollars to thousands of dollars, do not affect the correlation. This is because correlation focuses on the relationship's direction and strength, not on the units of measure.
Scale conversion
Scale conversion refers to changing one unit of measure to another. This is helpful in statistics for simplifying data representation and comparisons.
In our exercise, converting house prices from dollars to thousands of dollars is an example of scale conversion. This makes the numbers easier to work with, especially in financial contexts.
  • During scale conversion, mathematical consistency is maintained between the variables.
  • Most importantly, the linear relationship and correlation remain unchanged.
Such conversions are common practices in data analysis, ensuring that complexities are minimized without altering the fundamental relationships between data variables.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table shows the number of text messages sent and received by some people in one day. (Source: StatCrunch: Responses to survey How often do you text? Owner: Webster West. A subset was used.) a. Make a scatterplot of the data, and state the sign of the slope from the scatterplot. Use the number sent as the independent variable. b. Use linear regression to find the equation of the best-fit line. Graph the line with technology or by hand. c. Interpret the slope. d. Interpret the intercept. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Sent } & \text { Received } \\ \hline 1 & 2 \\ \hline 1 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 5 & 5 \\ \hline 5 & 1 \\ \hline 50 & 75 \\ \hline 6 & 8 \\ \hline 5 & 7 \\ \hline 300 & 300 \\ \hline 30 & 40 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{|r|r|} \hline \text { Sent } & \text { Received } \\ \hline 10 & 10 \\ \hline 3 & 5 \\ \hline 2 & 2 \\ \hline 5 & 5 \\ \hline 0 & 0 \\ \hline 2 & 2 \\ \hline 200 & 200 \\ \hline 1 & 1 \\ \hline 100 & 100 \\ \hline 50 & 50 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

a. The first scatterplot shows the college tuition and percentage acceptance at some colleges in Massachusetts. Would it make sense to find the correlation using this data set? Why or why not? b. The second scatterplot shows the composite grade on the ACT (American College Testing) exam and the English grade on the same exam. Would it make sense to find the correlation using this data set? Why or why not?

The following table shows the heights and weights of some people. The scatterplot shows that the association is linear enough to proceed. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Height (inches) } & \text { Weight (pounds) } \\ \hline 60 & 105 \\ \hline 66 & 140 \\ \hline 72 & 185 \\ \hline 70 & 145 \\ \hline 63 & 120 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the correlation, and find and report the equation of the regression line, using height as the predictor and weight as the response. b. Change the height to centimeters by multiplying each height in inches by \(2.54\). Find the weight in kilograms by dividing the weight in pounds by \(2.205 .\) Retain at least six digits in each number so there will be no errors due to rounding. c. Report the correlation between height in centimeters and weight in kilograms, and compare it with the correlation between the height in inches and weight in pounds. d. Find the equation of the regression line for predicting weight from height, using height in centimeters and weight in kilograms. Is the equation for weight in pounds and height in inches the same as or different from the equation for weight in kilograms and height in centimeters?

Suppose a doctor telephones those patients who are in the highest \(10 \%\) with regard to their recently recorded blood pressure and asks them to return for a clinical review. When she retakes their blood pressures, will those new blood pressures, as a group (that is, on average), tend to be higher than, lower than, or the same as the earlier blood pressures, and why?

The following table shows the weights and prices of some turkeys at different supermarkets. a. Make a scatterplot with weight on the \(x\) -axis and cost on the \(y\) -axis. Include the regression line on your scatterplot. b. Find the numerical value for the correlation between weight and price. Explain what the sign of the correlation shows. c. Report the equation of the best-fit straight line, using weight as the predictor \((x)\) and cost as the response \((y)\). d. Report the slope and intercept of the regression line, and explain what they show. If the intercept is not appropriate to report, explain why. e. Add a new point to your data: a 30 -pound turkey that is free. Give the new value for \(r\) and the new regression equation. Explain what the negative correlation implies. What happened? f. Find and interpret the coefficient of determination using the original data. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Weight (pounds) } & \text { Price } \\ \hline 12.3 & \$ 17.10 \\ \hline 18.5 & \$ 23.87 \\ \hline 20.1 & \$ 26.73 \\ \hline 16.7 & \$ 19.87 \\ \hline 15.6 & \$ 23.24 \\ \hline 10.2 & \$ 9.08 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.