/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 49 Alumni Donations The alumni offi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Alumni Donations The alumni office wishes to determine whether students who attend a reception with alumni just before graduation are more likely to donate money within the next two years. a. Describe a study based on a sample of students that would allow the alumni office to conclude that attending the reception causes future donations but that it is not possible to generalize this result to all students. b. Describe a study based on a sample of students that does not allow fundraisers to conclude that attending receptions causes future donations but does allow them to generalize to all students. c. Describe a study based on a sample of students that allows fundraisers to conclude that attending the reception causes future donations and also allows them to generalize to all students.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. A quasi-experimental design with limited generalisation can be used. b. An Observational or correlational study can provide generalised results but not causation. c. An experimental study with random assignment can provide both causation and generalisation.

Step by step solution

01

Answer for part a.

For a study that concludes attending the reception causes future donations but cannot generalize this result, a quasi-experimental design can be used. The sample could include students who attended and did not attend the reception, and post-graduation donations are tracked over two years. Since it's not randomized, it may fail to represent the total student body, limiting its generalization.
02

Answer for part b.

A observational or correlational study can be designed which can generalize its result but would not provide causation. By surveying a random and significant portion of all students including those who attended and did not attend the reception. The results would be generalized as it covers a wide range of students, but it would not prove causation as the study design is correlational not experimental.
03

Answer for part c.

To both conclude that attending the reception causes future donations and generalize to all students, an experimental study can be designed. First, students are randomly assigned to either attend or not attend the reception. Following graduation, donations are tracked over two years. Because of this design, we can argue for a causal relationship between attending the reception and donating, and since students were randomly selected, the results can be generalized to all students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Quasi-Experimental Design
A quasi-experimental design is often used when researchers wish to determine the causal impact of an intervention but are unable to use random assignment. In this context, specifically referring to the alumni donation study, a quasi-experimental design would involve selecting students who chose to attend a reception and comparing their donation behavior with those who did not attend.

This approach helps identify whether attending a reception correlates with increased donations soon after graduation. However, since the assignment of students into the reception attendees or non-attendees is not randomized, this design cannot establish a definitive causal relationship. Factors such as inherent differences in student characteristics might influence donation behaviors rather than the reception attendance itself.

Quasi-experimental designs are useful for real-world settings where randomization could be impractical or unethical. They provide insights into potential causal links while acknowledging limitations regarding the generalizability of the findings beyond the study group.
Observational Study
In an observational study, the researcher observes individuals and measures variables of interest without influencing the situation. For the alumni donations scenario, an observational study might involve collecting data on donations from a broad, random sample of students who did and did not attend the reception.

This type of study allows fundraisers to gather information that reflects the broader student body, hence enabling generalization of the findings. It helps in understanding whether there is an association between attending the reception and subsequent donations.

However, a key limitation of observational studies is their inability to imply causation. Without manipulating any variables, researchers cannot confidently assert that attending the reception causes increased donations, as there could be other underlying factors influencing this behavior.

These studies are valuable for exploring trends and correlations, especially when experimental designs are not feasible.
Experimental Study
An experimental study is a robust design that involves random assignment of subjects to either a treatment group or control group. In the case of examining the effect of attending alumni receptions on post-graduation donations, students would be randomly assigned to attend or not attend the reception. Their donation behavior would then be monitored over a set period, such as two years.

This randomization plays a crucial role in minimizing bias and ensuring that any observed differences in donation behavior can be attributed to the reception itself, thus establishing causality. Unlike other study designs, experimental studies provide stronger evidence due to the control over potential confounding variables.

This method also supports the generalization of results to a wider population, assuming the initial sample was representative. By being able to both demonstrate causality and achieve generalization, experimental studies serve as a gold standard in research for examining causal relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Smoking Cessation In a 2018 study reported in The New England Journal of Medicine, Halpern et al. randomly assigned smokers to one of five groups, including four smoking cessation interventions and usual care. Usual care consisted of access to information regarding the benefits of smoking cessation and to a motivational text-messaging service. The four interventions consisted of usual care plus one of the following: free cessation aids such as nicotine- replacement therapy or pharmacotherapy, free e-cigarettes, free cessation aids plus \(\$ 600\) in rewards for sustained abstinence, or free cessation aids plus \(\$ 600\) in redeemable funds deposited in an account for each participant, with money removed from the account if cessation milestones were not met. Researchers measured the percentage in each group who sustained smoking abstinence for six months. Results indicate that financial incentives added to free cessation aids resulted in a higher rate of sustained smoking abstinence than free cessation aids alone. Is this study an observational study or a controlled experiment? Explain. a. Is this study an observational study or a controlled experiment? Explain. b. Identify the treatment and response variables. c. Can a cause-and-effect conclusion be drawn from this study? Why or why not?

Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction Phubbing is the practice of ignoring one's companion or companions in order to pay attention to one's phone or other mobile device. In the conclusion of a 2017 study published in Personality and Individual Differences, researchers (Wang et al. 2017 ) concluded "The results indicated that partner phubbing had a negative effect on relationship satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction had a negative effect on depression." Is this conclusion likely to be the result of an observational study or a controlled experiment? Can we conclude phubbing causes decreased relationship satisfaction from this study? Explain.

Recidivism Rates The 3-year recidivism rate in the United States is about \(68 \%\), which means that \(68 \%\) of released U.S. prisoners return to prison within 3 years of release. There have been many attempts to reduce the recidivism rate. Suppose you want to determine whether electronic monitoring bracelets that track the location of the released prisoner reduce recidivism. Suppose that offenders released from prison are observed for 3 years to see whether they go back to prison and that the ones who wear electronic monitoring bracelets wear them for the first year only. a. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that would allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but would not allow it to generalize this result to all released prisoners. b. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that does not allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but does allow it to generalize to all released offenders. c. Describe a study based on a sample of released prisoners that allows the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism and also allows it to generalize to all released offenders.

Music Lovers A large concert promoter that operates several hundred concert locations around the country wants to survey the managers at these locations to ask their opinions about how to improve attendance at concerts. Because the survey is rather lengthy. the promoter does not want to ask all the managers and decides to ask a random sample of managers instead. The promoter organizes the concert locations into 20 different geographic zones, randomly selects 5 zones, and surveys all of the managers in those 5 zones. Is this an example of stratified random sampling, systematic sampling. or cluster sampling?

Yoga and Cellular Aging A 2017 study explored the impact of Yoga and Meditation based Lifestyle Intervention (YMLI) on cellular aging in healthy individuals (Tohlahunase et al. 2017). Ninety-six healthy individuals were enrolled in the 12-week YMLI course, which consisted of yoga postures, breathing exercises, and meditation. Participants attended YMLI for as a group for two weeks, 5 days per week. After the initial two-week period, participants did the program individually at home. Participation was monitored through the maintenance of a diary and telephone contact. After 12 weeks, researchers found significant improvement in biomarkers of cellular aging and longevity among participants. Does this study show that YMLI causes improvement in biomarkers of cellular aging and leads to increased longevity? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.