/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 76 The following table, reproduced ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following table, reproduced from Exercise \(13.26\), gives information on the amount of sugar (in grams) and the calorie count in one serving of a sample of 13 varieties of Kellogg's cereal. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrrrrrrrr} \hline \text { Sugar (grams) } & 4 & 15 & 12 & 11 & 8 & 6 & 7 & 2 & 7 & 14 & 20 & 3 & 13 \\ \hline \text { Calories } & 120 & 200 & 140 & 110 & 120 & 80 & 190 & 100 & 120 & 190 & 190 & 110 & 120 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the correlation coefficient. Is its sign the same as that of \(b\) calculated in Exercise \(13.26\) ? b. Test at the \(1 \%\) significance level whether the linear correlation coefficient between the two variables listed in the table is positive.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation coefficient will be obtained through the computation using Pearson's correlation formula and compared with the correlation in Exercise \(13.26\) while considering the sign. After that, a hypothesis test will be conducted by calculating the t-value and comparing it against the critical value at a 1% significance level to determine whether the correlation is positive.

Step by step solution

01

Organise the Data

First arrange the sugar content in \(x_i\) values and the calories in \(y_i\) values. Count the number of pairs as \(n\), which is 13 in this case.
02

Calculate Required Quantities

Calculate the sums \(\sum{x_i}\), \(\sum{y_i}\), \(\sum{x_i^2}\), \(\sum{y_i^2}\), and \(\sum{x_iy_i}\) using the corresponding pairs of data.
03

Apply Formula for Pearson's Correlation

Use the formula for Pearson's correlation where \( r = \frac{n(\sum{x_iy_i})-(\sum{x_i})(\sum{y_i})}{\sqrt{[n\sum{x_i^2}-(\sum{x_i})^2][n\sum{y_i^2}-(\sum{y_i})^2]}} \) to calculate the correlation coefficient.
04

Comparing Sign

Check whether the correlation coefficient's sign obtained in step 3 is the same as that of \(b\) calculated in Exercise \(13.26\).
05

Hypothesis Testing

To test whether the correlation is positive at a 1% significance level, formulate the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis is that the correlation coefficient \(r\) is less than or equal to 0, or \(H_0: r\leq0\). The alternative hypothesis is that the correlation coefficient \(r\) is greater than 0, or \(H_1: r>0\). Use the equation \(t = r \sqrt{\frac{n-2}{1-r^2}}\) to find the value of \(t\).
06

Determine the Critical Region

Given the significant level of 1%, we need to determine the critical value from the t-distribution table for \(n-2\) degrees of freedom. If \(t > t_{0.01}\), where \(t_{0.01}\) is the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Correlation
Linear correlation refers to the relationship between two variables that can be represented with a straight line. It indicates how one variable changes as the other variable changes. For example, if the sugar content increases, does the calorie count also increase?
  • If the points on a graph of two variables slope upwards, the correlation is positive.
  • If the points slope downwards, the correlation is negative.
  • A correlation of zero implies no linear relationship.
Linear correlation is particularly useful in predicting one variable based on the other. In the context of the exercise, we aim to predict changes in calories based on changes in sugar content. This is done using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, which quantifies the strength and direction of the linear relationship.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), is the probability of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis. It is a threshold set by the researcher to determine whether a correlation observed is statistically significant.
  • A common significance level is 0.05, but in this exercise, it’s set to 0.01 which is more stringent.
  • A lower \( \alpha \) value means a stronger evidence is required to reject the null hypothesis.
In this exercise, a 1% significance level means there's only a 1% chance that the relationship observed is due to random variation rather than a real effect. Thus, if we find evidence stronger than this threshold, we can be more confident in the relationship between sugar and calories.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, denoted as \( r \), quantifies the degree and direction of linear association between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1.
  • If \( r = 1 \), the variables have a perfect positive linear relationship.
  • If \( r = -1 \), the variables have a perfect negative linear relationship.
  • If \( r = 0 \), there is no linear association.
The formula presented in the solution utilizes the sums of the products and squares to compute \( r \). This coefficient helps us understand how much the sugar content and calorie count move together, and this is critical for subsequent hypothesis testing. Observing the sign of \( r \) helps confirm if it matches expected relationships, such as those found in previous calculations.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to decide whether the evidence in a sample of data is strong enough to reject a null hypothesis. For this problem:
  • The null hypothesis \( (H_0) \) posits that there is no positive correlation (\( r \leq 0 \)).
  • The alternative hypothesis \( (H_1) \) asserts that there is a positive correlation (\( r > 0 \)).
We use the test statistic \( t \), which is calculated based on the correlation coefficient and number of samples, to determine if \( r \) significantly deviates from 0.
The critical value is derived from the \( t \)-distribution, reflecting \( n-2 \) degrees of freedom, where \( n \) is the number of data points. If the calculated \( t \) surpasses this critical value at the 1% significance level, we reject the null hypothesis, supporting a positive correlation between sugar and calorie levels. This testing method ensures our conclusions have statistical backing, minimizing the chance of making false claims based on the sample data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the past 25 years Burton Hodge has been keeping track of how many times he mows his lawn and the average size of the ears of corn in his garden. Hearing about the Pearson correlation coefficient from a statistician buddy of his, Burton decides to substantiate his suspicion that the more often he mows his lawn, the bigger are the ears of corn. He does so by computing the correlation coefficient. Lo and behold, Burton finds a \(.93\) coefficient of correlation! Elated, he calls his friend the statistician to thank him and announce that next year he will have prize-winning ears of corn because he plans to mow his lawn every day. Do you think Burton's logic is correct? If not, how would you explain to Burton the mistake he is making in his presumption (without eroding his new opinion of statistics)? Suggest what Burton could do next year to make the ears of corn large, and relate this to the Pearson correlation coefficient.

The following table containing data on the aerobic exercise levels (running distance in miles) and blood sugar levels for 12 different days for a diabetic is reproduced from Exercise \(13.27 .\) $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrrrrrr} \hline \text { Distance (miles) } & 2 & 2 & 2.5 & 2.5 & 3 & 3 & 3.5 & 3.5 & 4 & 4 & 4.5 & 4.5 \\ \hline \text { Blood sugar }(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}) & 136 & 146 & 131 & 125 & 120 & 116 & 104 & 95 & 85 & 94 & 83 & 75 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find the standard deviation of errors. b. Compute the coefficient of determination. What percentage of the variation in blood sugar level is explained by the least squares regression of blood sugar level on the distance run? What percentage of this variation is not explained?

Explain the meaning of coefficient of determination.

A container of one dozen large eggs was purchased at a local grocery store. Each egg was measured to determine its diameter (in millimeters) and weight (in grams). The results for the 12 eggs are given in the following table. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllllllll} \hline \text { Diameter }(\mathrm{mm}) & 42.2 & 45.5 & 47.8 & 47.4 & 47.7 & 43.5 & 44.4 & 43.9 & 46.2 & 45.9 & 44.3 & 44.5 \\ \hline \text { Weight (grams) } & 52.8 & 58.5 & 60.2 & 59.0 & 57.4 & 54.1 & 53.8 & 54.5 & 56.2 & 55.8 & 54.3 & 56.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Find the following. a. \(\mathrm{SS}_{x p} \mathrm{SS}_{y p}\) and \(\mathrm{SS}_{x y}\) b. Standard deviation of errors c. SST, SSE and SSR d. Coefficient of determination

Briefly explain the assumptions of the population regression model.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.