/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Describe the two types of errors... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe the two types of errors that can be made in a test of hypotheses.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Type I error is the false rejection of a true null hypothesis; Type II error is the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Type I Error

A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is true, but we mistakenly reject it. This is often referred to as a 'false positive' or 'alpha error'. In statistical hypothesis testing, this is the error of concluding that there is an effect or a difference when in fact there is none. The probability of making a Type I error is denoted by the significance level, \( \alpha \).
02

Identify Type II Error

A Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is false, but we fail to reject it. This is known as a 'false negative' or 'beta error'. This error means we miss an effect or a difference that is actually present. The probability of making a Type II error is denoted by \( \beta \).
03

Compare and Contrast

To understand the differences, remember that a Type I error is about seeing something that isn't there (false alarm), while a Type II error is about missing something that is there (missed detection). Both types of errors have implications on the conclusions drawn from hypothesis testing and need to be balanced in experimental design.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
In the realm of statistical hypothesis testing, a Type I error is a crucial concept to grasp. Often referred to as a "false positive," this error occurs when the null hypothesis, which actually holds true, is rejected based on the sample data. Think of it like sounding an alarm when everything is, in fact, okay. The result of a Type I error is that you believe there is an effect or a difference when there is none in reality.

The significance level, denoted by the Greek letter \( \alpha \), is the probability of committing a Type I error. Commonly, researchers set this significance level at 0.05 or 5%. This means there's a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. Setting \( \alpha \) too high increases the chances of making a Type I error, so it's important to choose it wisely based on the context of the study.

Key points about Type I Error:
  • Occurs when null hypothesis is true but rejected.
  • Known as a false positive or alpha error.
  • Probability of occurrence is equal to the significance level (\( \alpha \)).
Type II Error
A Type II error, in contrast to a Type I error, occurs when the null hypothesis is false, yet it is not rejected based on the sample data. Imagine an alarm system failing to sound when there's genuinely an issue - this is akin to a "false negative."

In technical terms, a Type II error takes place when we miss detecting an effect or difference that actually exists. The probability of making such an error is denoted by \( \beta \). While \( \alpha \) is about false alarms, \( \beta \) is about missed detections.

The desire is to have as small a \( \beta \) as possible. However, always strive for balance, as reducing \( \beta \) often involves increasing the sample size, which can impact the study's feasibility in terms of resources and time.

Key aspects of a Type II Error include:
  • Occurs when null hypothesis is false but not rejected.
  • Referred to as a false negative or beta error.
  • Probability of occurrence is denoted by \( \beta \).
Significance Level
A significance level, represented by \( \alpha \), is a fundamental part of hypothesis testing. It sets the threshold for how extreme the sample data must be before you reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level is like a gatekeeper that helps decide whether the evidence against the null hypothesis is strong enough to reject it. Common significance levels used in testing are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, with 0.05 being the most common choice.

When you set the significance level at 0.05, it means there's a 5% risk of incorrectly rejecting the true null hypothesis (committing a Type I error). The smaller the \( \alpha \), the stricter the testing criterion, which reduces the risk of a Type I error but might increase the risk of a Type II error.

Things to remember about Significance Levels:
  • It determines the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • A smaller \( \alpha \) reduces the risk of Type I error.
  • Common values are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under what circumstance is a test of hypotheses certain to yield a correct decision?

The mean yield for hard red winter wheat in a certain state is 44.8 bu/acre. In a pilot program a modified growing scheme was introduced on 35 independent plots. The result was a sample mean yield of 45.4 bu/acre with sample standard deviation 1.6 bu/acre, an apparent increase in yield. a. Test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance whether the mean yield under the new scheme is greater than 44.8 bu/acre, using the critical value approach. b. Compute the observed significance of the test. c. Perform the test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance using the \(p\) -value approach. You need not repeat the first three steps, already done in part (a).

In the previous year the proportion of deposits in checking accounts at a certain bank that were made electronically was \(45 \%\). The bank wishes to determine if the proportion is higher this year. It examined 20,000 deposit records and found that 9,217 were electronic. Determine, at the \(1 \%\) level of significance, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that more than \(45 \%\) of all deposits to checking accounts are now being made electronically.

Six coins of the same type are discovered at an archaeological site. If their weights on average are significantly different from 5.25 grams then it can be assumed that their provenance is not the site itself. The coins are weighed and have mean \(4.73 \mathrm{~g}\) with sample standard deviation \(0.18 \mathrm{~g}\). Perform the relevant test at the \(0.1 \%\) (1/10th of \(1 \%)\) level of significance, assuming a normal distribution of weights of all such coins.

Find the rejection region (for the standardized test statistic) for each hypothesis test. Identify the test as left-tailed, right-tailed, or two- tailed. a. \(\quad H 0: \mu=-62\) Vs. Ha: \(\mu \neq-62 @ \alpha=0.005\). b. \(\quad H_{0}: \mu=73\) VS. Ha: \(\mu>73 @ \alpha=0.001\). c. \(\quad H 0: \mu=1124\) VS. Ha: \(\mu<1124 @ \alpha=0.001\). d. \(\quad H 0: \mu=0.12\) VS. Ha: \(\mu \neq 0.12 @ \alpha=0.001\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.