/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 The Department of Parks and Wild... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The Department of Parks and Wildlife stocks a large lake with fish every six years. It is determined that a healthy diversity of fish in the lake should consist of \(10 \%\) largemouth bass, \(15 \%\) smallmouth bass, \(10 \%\) striped bass, \(10 \%\) trout, and \(20 \%\) catfish. Therefore each time the lake is stocked, the fish population in the lake is restored to maintain that particular distribution. Every three years, the department conducts a study to see whether the distribution of the fish in the lake has shifted away from the target proportions. In one particular year, a research group from the department observed a sample of 292 fish from the lake with the results given in the table provided. Test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether there is sufficient evidence in the data to conclude that the fish population distribution has shifted since the last stocking. $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Fish } & \text { Target Distribution } & \text { Fish in Sample } \\ \hline \text { Largemouth Bass } & 0.10 & 14 \\ \hline \text { Smallmouth Bass } & 0.15 & 49 \\ \hline \text { Striped Bass } & 0.10 & 21 \\ \hline \text { Trout } & 0.10 & 22 \\ \hline \text { Catfish } & 0.20 & 75 \\ \hline \text { Other } & 0.35 & 111\\\ \hline \end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The data suggests a shift in fish population distribution from the target.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

We start the process by setting up our null and alternative hypotheses. **Null Hypothesis (H鈧):** The distribution of fish in the lake follows the target distribution. **Alternative Hypothesis (H鈧):** The distribution of fish in the lake does not follow the target distribution.
02

Compute Expected Frequencies

Calculate the expected frequencies for each category of fish based on the target distribution and the total sample size (292). The expected frequency for each category can be calculated using:\[\text{Expected Frequency} = \text{Total Sample Size} \times \text{Target Proportion}\]- Largemouth Bass: \(292 \times 0.10 = 29.2\)- Smallmouth Bass: \(292 \times 0.15 = 43.8\)- Striped Bass: \(292 \times 0.10 = 29.2\)- Trout: \(292 \times 0.10 = 29.2\)- Catfish: \(292 \times 0.20 = 58.4\)- Other: \(292 \times 0.35 = 102.2\)
03

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic

The Chi-Square statistic is calculated using the formula:\[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(\text{Observed} - \text{Expected})^2}{\text{Expected}}\]Applying to each category:- Largemouth Bass: \(\frac{(14 - 29.2)^2}{29.2} = 7.25\)- Smallmouth Bass: \(\frac{(49 - 43.8)^2}{43.8} = 0.62\)- Striped Bass: \(\frac{(21 - 29.2)^2}{29.2} = 2.31\)- Trout: \(\frac{(22 - 29.2)^2}{29.2} = 1.77\)- Catfish: \(\frac{(75 - 58.4)^2}{58.4} = 4.60\)- Other: \(\frac{(111 - 102.2)^2}{102.2} = 0.75\)Adding these values gives us the total Chi-Square statistic: \[\chi^2 = 7.25 + 0.62 + 2.31 + 1.77 + 4.60 + 0.75 = 17.30\]
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Critical Value

We need to determine the degrees of freedom (df) to find the critical value from the Chi-Square distribution table.The degrees of freedom are calculated as:\[\text{df} = (\text{Number of Categories} - 1) = 6 - 1 = 5\]Using a Chi-Square distribution table or calculator, we find the critical value for 5 degrees of freedom at \(5\%\) level of significance to be approximately 11.07.
05

Make a Decision

Compare our computed Chi-Square statistic with the critical value:\[\chi^2 = 17.30 > 11.07\] Since the calculated Chi-Square value (17.30) is greater than the critical value (11.07), we reject the null hypothesis.
06

Conclusion

Since we rejected the null hypothesis, this implies that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the fish population distribution has shifted from the target distribution since the last stocking.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis serves as a starting point in hypothesis testing and establishes a benchmark for comparison. In the context of the Chi-Square Test, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) usually states that there is no significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies. It asserts that any variations are due to random chance rather than genuine differences.

When you state the null hypothesis, it is typically in a predictable format, such as "The distribution of the fish in the lake follows the target distribution." This implies that any deviations in the observed data are not substantial enough to conclude that the distribution has changed.
  • If statistical evidence is strong against the null hypothesis, it can be rejected, suggesting that a real difference or relationship exists in the data.
  • A key part of hypothesis testing is selecting the right significance level, commonly denoted as \(\alpha\), which impacts your threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis.
Understanding the null hypothesis helps set clear expectations and criteria for analysis in a Chi-Square Test.
Expected Frequency
Expected frequency is crucial in Chi-Square Tests to compare against the actual observed frequency in each category. It is not based on observed data but rather calculated based on the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

Calculating the expected frequency involves:
  • Using the total sample size and the target proportions for each category. For example, if 10% of the fish population should be largemouth bass, the expected frequency is calculated by multiplying the total sample size by the proportion (292 \(\times 0.10 = 29.2\)).
  • These numbers provide a baseline for what the population distribution should look like if everything stayed True to the null hypothesis.
Properly calculating expected frequencies allows for a valid comparison between what is observed and what was anticipated, thereby facilitating the computation of the Chi-Square statistic. If the observed frequencies deviate substantially from these expected frequencies, it is likely to impact the decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
Degrees of Freedom
The concept of degrees of freedom (df) can initially seem abstract, but it's fundamental for analyzing the Chi-Square statistic's significance. In simple terms, degrees of freedom refer to the number of values in a calculation that are free to vary while still conforming to a statistical model.

For a Chi-Square Test, degrees of freedom are calculated as one less than the number of categories being tested. So, if testing a sample with six categories of fish, as in this exercise, the degrees of freedom is:\[\text{df} = \text{Number of Categories} - 1 = 6 - 1 = 5\]df is essential when determining the critical value from the Chi-Square distribution table. The more degrees of freedom, the closer the Chi-Square distribution approaches a normal distribution.

  • Understanding df helps in assessing how the Chi-Square value compares against known statistical distributions.
  • It enables you to judge whether the difference between observed and expected data is statistically significant.
Grasping the degrees of freedom concept allows you to correctly interpret Chi-Square statistical results, leading to more reliable conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Helping people to lose weight has become a huge industry in the United States, with annual revenue in the hundreds of billion dollars. Recently each of the three market-leading weight reducing programs claimed to be the most effective. A consumer research company recruited 33 people who wished to lose weight and sent them to the three leading programs. After six months their weight losses were recorded. The results are summarized below: $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Statistic } & \text { Prog. 1 } & \text { Prog. 2 } & \text { Prog. 3 } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } & x-1=10.65 & x-2=8.90 & x-3=9.33 \\ \hline \text { Sample Variance } & s 21=27.20 & s 22=16.86 & s 23=32.40 \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & n_{1}=11 & n 2=11 & n 3=11 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The mean weight loss of the combined sample of all 33 people was \(x-=9.63\).Test, using the ANOVA \(F\) -test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that some program is more effective than the others.

A data sample is sorted into five categories with an assumed probability distribution. $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Factor Levels } & \text { Assumed Distribution } & \text { Observed Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & p_{1}=0.1 & 10 \\ \hline 2 & p_{2}=0.4 & 35 \\ \hline 3 & p^{3}=0.4 & 45 \\ \hline 4 & p_{4}=0.1 & 10 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. Find the size \(n\) of the sample. b. Find the expected number \(E\) of observations for each level, if the sampled population has a probability distribution as assumed (that is, just use the formula \(E_{i}=n \times p i\) ). c. Find the chi-square test statistic \(\chi\). d. Find the number of degrees of freedom of the chi-square test statistic.

Japanese sturgeon is a subspecies of the sturgeon family indigenous to Japan and the Northwest Pacific. In a particular fish hatchery newly hatched baby Japanese sturgeon are kept in tanks for several weeks before being transferred to larger ponds. Dissolved oxygen in tank water is very tightly monitored by an electronic system and rigorously maintained at a target level of 6.5 milligrams per liter (mg/I). The fish hatchery looks to upgrade their water monitoring systems for tighter control of dissolved oxygen. A new system is evaluated against the old one currently being used in terms of the variance in measured dissolved oxygen. Thirty-one water samples from a tank operated with the new system were collected and 16 water samples from a tank operated with the old system were collected, all during the course of a day. The samples yield the following information: New Sample \(1: n 1=31 s 21=0.0121\) $$ \text { Old Sample } 2: n_{2}=16 \mathrm{~s} 22=0.0319 $$ Test, at the \(10 \%\) level of significance, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the new system will provide a tighter control of dissolved oxygen in the tanks.

For each of the two samples $$ \begin{array}{l} \text { Sarmla } 1:\\{0.8,1.2,1.1,0.8,-2.0\\} \\ \text { Sarmle } 2:\\{-2.0,0.0,0.7,0.8,2.2,4.1,-1.8\\} \end{array} $$ find a. the sample size, b. the sample mean, c. the sample variance.

A data sample is sorted into five categories with an assumed probability distribution. $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Factor Levels } & \text { Assumed Distribution } & \text { Observed Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & p_{1}=0.3 & 23 \\ \hline 2 & p_{2}=0.3 & 30 \\ \hline 3 & p_{3}=0.2 & 19 \\ \hline 4 & p_{4}=0.1 & 8 \\ \hline 5 & p s=0.1 & 10 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ a. Find the size \(n\) of the sample. b. Find the expected number \(E\) of observations for each level, if the sampled population has a probability distribution as assumed (that is, just use the formula \(\left.E_{i}=n \times p_{i}\right)\). c. Find the chi-square test statistic \(\chi^{2}\). d. Find the number of degrees of freedom of the chi-square test statistic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.