/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 A chess opening is a sequence of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A chess opening is a sequence of moves at the beginning of a chess game. There are many well-studied named openings in chess literature. French Defense is one of the most popular openings for black, although it is considered a relatively weak opening since it gives black probability 0.344 of winning, probability 0.405 of losing, and probability 0.251 of drawing. A chess master believes that he has discovered a new variation of French Defense that may alter the probability distribution of the outcome of the game. In his many Internet chess games in the last two years, he was able to apply the new variation in 77 games. The wins, losses, and draws in the 77 games are given in the table provided. Test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether there is sufficient evidence in the data to conclude that the newly discovered variation of French Defense alters the probability distribution of the result of the game. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Result for Black } & \text { Probability Distribution } & \text { New Variation Wins } \\ \hline \text { Win } & 0.344 & 31 \\ \hline \text { Loss } & 0.405 & 25 \\ \hline \text { Draw } & 0.251 & 21 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The new variation does not significantly alter the probability distribution of outcomes.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

We need to perform a hypothesis test to determine if the new variation alters the probability distribution. Define the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) as the probabilities for wins, losses, and draws being the same as the original French Defense. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) is that at least one of these probabilities has changed.
02

Collect Observed Frequencies

Based on the data, we have 31 wins, 25 losses, and 21 draws from the 77 games played using the new variation.
03

Determine Expected Frequencies

Use the given probabilities: for 77 games, the expected number of wins \( E_1 = 77 \times 0.344 \), losses \( E_2 = 77 \times 0.405 \), and draws \( E_3 = 77 \times 0.251 \). Calculate these expected values.
04

Calculate Expected Frequencies

Calculate:\[ E_1 = 77 \times 0.344 = 26.488 \]\[ E_2 = 77 \times 0.405 = 31.185 \]\[ E_3 = 77 \times 0.251 = 19.327 \]
05

Compute Chi-Square Statistic

The chi-square statistic is calculated using:\[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \]Where \( O_i \) and \( E_i \) are the observed and expected frequencies for each outcome.
06

Calculate the Chi-Square Value

Substitute the values:\[ \chi^2 = \frac{(31-26.488)^2}{26.488} + \frac{(25-31.185)^2}{31.185} + \frac{(21-19.327)^2}{19.327} \]\[ = \frac{4.512^2}{26.488} + \frac{(-6.185)^2}{31.185} + \frac{1.673^2}{19.327} \]After computing, \( \chi^2 \approx 3.014 \).
07

Determine the Critical Value

With 2 degrees of freedom (since 3 categories - 1 = 2) at a \(5\%\) significance level, the critical chi-square value from the chi-square distribution table is approximately 5.991.
08

Conclusion

Since the computed chi-square value \(3.014\) is less than the critical value \(5.991\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \). There is not enough evidence to conclude that the probability distribution has changed with the new variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test
The Chi-Square Test is a non-parametric statistical test that is used to determine if there is a significant difference between the expected and observed data. It's commonly applied to test hypotheses about population proportions in different categories. This test is perfect for scenarios where you want to see if a certain treatment or variation alters an expected outcome.
This test compares observed frequencies with expected frequencies that we calculate based on an assumed probability distribution.
  • Observed Frequency: The actual count of cases that occurred in each category.
  • Expected Frequency: The count we would expect in each category if the null hypothesis were true.
In our exercise, a chess master wants to see if a new variation impacts the win/loss draw ratio compared to the classic French Defense. After setting up the hypotheses, we calculate a Chi-Square statistic using:\[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}\]where \(O_i\) are the observed frequencies and \(E_i\) are the expected frequencies. If the \(\chi^2\) value is higher than a critical value from the Chi-Square distribution (given a certain degree of freedom), it suggests a significant difference. However, in this case, since our calculated value is less than the critical value, we conclude there's no significant change due to the new variation.
Probability Distribution
A probability distribution describes how the probabilities are distributed over the possible outcomes of a random variable. It encompasses the probabilities of all potential differences for a given scenario, such as the possible results in a chess game.
Understanding these distributions helps in determining expected outcomes and how new strategies might alter these expectations. The original French Defense has an associated probability distribution for winning, losing, and drawing:
  • Winning Probability: 0.344
  • Losing Probability: 0.405
  • Drawing Probability: 0.251
In the context of the exercise, the probability distribution serves as our baseline to test whether the new variation has an effect. By comparing the observed frequencies against those expected by this distribution, we can make enlightened decisions about the efficacy of changes or variations tested within the scenario. This determination is crucial in Chess for evaluating new strategies.
French Defense Variation
The French Defense is a strategic chess opening that offers players structure and counterattacking chances. However, like any strategy, it comes with certain statistical outcomes based on historical data. With the given probabilities for winning, losing, and drawing, a variation in this opening is tested to see if it could sway these outcomes favorably.
In this exercise, the chess master applied a new variation to attempt to change the typical French Defense outcome distributions. Over 77 games, actual results were recorded to analyze any potential variation impact. The current analysis hinges on whether this alternative strategy has shifted the win/loss/draw ratio significantly compared to the traditional approach. Despite potential practical benefits, statistical analysis showed the variation did not lead to significant changes in outcome probabilities, according to the Chi-Square Test applied. This demonstrates the importance of both tactical and statistical evaluations when examining adjustments in any strategic domain, such as chess.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Helping people to lose weight has become a huge industry in the United States, with annual revenue in the hundreds of billion dollars. Recently each of the three market-leading weight reducing programs claimed to be the most effective. A consumer research company recruited 33 people who wished to lose weight and sent them to the three leading programs. After six months their weight losses were recorded. The results are summarized below: $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Statistic } & \text { Prog. 1 } & \text { Prog. 2 } & \text { Prog. 3 } \\ \hline \text { Sample Mean } & x-1=10.65 & x-2=8.90 & x-3=9.33 \\ \hline \text { Sample Variance } & s 21=27.20 & s 22=16.86 & s 23=32.40 \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & n_{1}=11 & n 2=11 & n 3=11 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The mean weight loss of the combined sample of all 33 people was \(x-=9.63\).Test, using the ANOVA \(F\) -test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that some program is more effective than the others.

The litter size of Bengal tigers is typically two or three cubs, but it can vary between one and four. Based on long-term observations, the litter size of Bengal tigers in the wild has the distribution given in the table provided. A zoologist believes that Bengal tigers in captivity tend to have different (possibly smaller) litter sizes from those in the wild. To verify this belief, the zoologist searched all data sources and found 316 litter size records of Bengal tigers in captivity. The results are given in the table provided. Test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether there is sufficient evidence in the data to conclude that the distribution of litter sizes in captivity differs from that in the wild. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Litter Size } & \text { Wild Litter Distribution } & \text { Observed Frequency } \\ \hline 1 & 0.11 & 41 \\ \hline 2 & 0.69 & 243 \\ \hline 3 & 0.18 & 27 \\ \hline 4 & 0.02 & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Retailers of collectible postage stamps often buy their stamps in large quantities by weight at auctions. The prices the retailers are willing to pay depend on how old the postage stamps are. Many collectible postage stamps at auctions are described by the proportions of stamps issued at various periods in the past. Generally the older the stamps the higher the value. At one particular auction, a lot of collectible stamps is advertised to have the age distribution given in the table provided. A retail buyer took a sample of 73 stamps from the lot and sorted them by age. The results are given in the table provided. Test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether there is sufficient evidence in the data to conclude that the age distribution of the lot is different from what was claimed by the seller. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & \text { Claimed Distribution } & \text { Observed Frequency } \\ \hline \text { Before } 1940 & 0.10 & 6 \\ \hline 1940 \text { to } 1959 & 0.25 & 15 \\ \hline 1960 \text { to } 1979 & 0.45 & 30 \\ \hline \text { After } 1979 & 0.20 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The Mozart effect refers to a boost of average performance on tests for elementary school students if the students listen to Mozart's chamber music for a period of time immediately before the test. Many educators believe that such an effect is not necessarily due to Mozart's music per se but rather a relaxation period before the test. To support this belief, an elementary school teacher conducted an experiment by dividing her third-grade class of 15 students into three groups of \(5 .\) Students in the first group were asked to give themselves a self-administered facial massage; students in the second group listened to Mozart's chamber music for 15 minutes; students in the third group listened to Schubert's chamber music for 15 minutes before the test. The scores of the 15 students are given below: $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group 3 } \\ \hline 79 & 82 & 80 \\ \hline 81 & 84 & 81 \\ \hline 80 & 86 & 71 \\ \hline 89 & 91 & 90 \\ \hline 86 & 82 & 86 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Test, using the ANOVA F-test at the \(10 \%\) level of significance, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that any of the three relaxation method does better than the others.

The Mozart effect refers to a boost of average performance on tests for elementary school students if the students listen to Mozart's chamber music for a period of time immediately before the test. In order to attempt to test whether the Mozart effect actually exists, an elementary school teacher conducted an experiment by dividing her third-grade class of 15 students into three groups of 5 . The first group was given an end-of-grade test without music; the second group listened to Mozart's chamber music for 10 minutes; and the third groups listened to Mozart's chamber music for 20 minutes before the test. The scores of the 15 students are given below: $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Group 1 } & \text { Group 2 } & \text { Group 3 } \\ \hline 80 & 79 & 73 \\ \hline 63 & 73 & 82 \\ \hline 74 & 74 & 79 \\ \hline 71 & 77 & 82 \\ \hline 70 & 81 & 84 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Using the ANOVA F-test at \(\alpha=0.10\), is there sufficient evidence in the data to suggest that the Mozart effect exists?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.