/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 Many fields of engineering requi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Many fields of engineering require accurate population estimates. For example, transportation engineers might find it necessary to determine separately the population growth trends of a city and adjacent suburb. The population of the urban area is declining with time according to $$P_{u}(t)=P_{u, \max } e^{-k_{a t} t}+P_{u, \min }$$ while the suburban population is growing, as in $$P_{s}(t)=\frac{P_{s, \max }}{1+\left[P_{s, \max } / P_{0}-1\right] e^{-k_{s} t}}$$ where \(P_{u, \max }, k_{u}, P_{s, \max }, P_{0},\) and \(k_{s}=\) empirically derived parameters. Determine the time and corresponding values of \(P_{u}(t)\) and \(P_{s}(t)\) when the suburbs are \(20 \%\) larger than the city. The parameter values are \(P_{u, \max }=75,000, \quad k_{u}=0.045 / \mathrm{yr}, \quad P_{u, \min }=100,000\) people, \(P_{s, \max }=300,000\) people, \(P_{0}=10,000\) people, \(k_{s}=\) \(0.08 /\) yr. To obtain your solutions, use (a) graphical, (b) falseposition, and (c) modified secant methods.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, to find the time t and corresponding values of the urban and suburban populations when the suburban population is 20% larger than the urban population, use the given equations and parameter values with three different methods. a) Graphical Method: Plot the urban and suburban population equations, and find the point of intersection. b) False-Position Method: Iteratively update the time estimates using the false position formula until convergence. c) Modified Secant Method: Iteratively update the time estimate using the modified secant formula with a small perturbation factor until convergence. Upon applying these methods, you will find the desired time t and corresponding values of the populations.

Step by step solution

01

Graph the Equations

Plot both the urban and suburban population equations using the dependent variable t and independent variables \(P_u(t)\) and \(P_s(t)\), respectively. Step 2: Find the Intersection Point
02

Locate Intersection of the Population Graphs

The point of intersection between the two population graphs will give us the values of t and corresponding \(P_u(t)\) and \(P_s(t)\) when the suburban population is 20% larger than the urban population. #b) False-Position Method# In the false-position method, we start with two initial guesses for the time t and iteratively update these guesses until we find the value of t that satisfies \(P_s(t) = 1.2 * P_u(t)\). Step 1: Select Initial Time Estimates
03

Choose Time Estimates

Choose appropriate initial estimates for time t, say \(t_1\) and \(t_2\). Make sure that the function $$P_s(t_i) - 1.2*P_u(t_i)$$ changes sign between the two points. Step 2: Iterate until Convergence
04

Evaluate and Update Time Estimates

Use the false-position formula to iteratively find a better time estimate, say t, until the difference in successive estimates is below a desired tolerance, and the function value at the estimated time is almost 0. For each iteration, update the time estimate using the false position formula: $$t_{next} = t_1 - \frac{(P_s(t_1)-1.2*P_u(t_1))(t_2-t_1)}{(P_s(t_2)-1.2*P_u(t_2))-(P_s(t_1)-1.2*P_u(t_1))}$$ Then, update the corresponding population values at the estimated time t. #c) Modified Secant Method# The modified secant method also starts with an initial guess for the time t and iteratively refines this guess by evaluating the function ratio, using a small perturbation. Step 1: Select Initial Time Estimate
05

Choose the Initial Time Estimate

Choose an initial time estimate, say t, and a perturbation factor, say δ, which is a small value (typically 0.001). Step 2: Iterate until Convergence
06

Evaluate and Update Time Estimates

Use the modified secant formula to iteratively update the time estimate, t, until the difference in successive estimates is below a desired tolerance, and the function value at the estimated time is almost 0. For each iteration, update the time estimate using the modified secant formula: $$t_{next} = t - \frac{(P_s(t)-1.2*P_u(t))\delta t}{(P_s(t+\delta t)-1.2*P_u(t+\delta t))-(P_s(t)-1.2*P_u(t))}$$ Then, update the corresponding population values at the estimated time t. By following the mentioned steps for each method, we will find the time(t) when the suburban population is 20% larger than the urban population and the corresponding values of the populations at that time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

False-Position Method
The False-Position Method, also known as the Regula Falsi method, is a numerical technique used for root-finding. It is essentially a bracketing method similar to the bisection method, but with one key difference. Instead of bisecting the interval, it uses a linear interpolation to estimate the root. This method is particularly useful for continuous and smooth functions.

To start, two initial guesses are selected on the x-axis, say \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \), such that the function value changes sign over this interval. In our population growth exercise, we apply it to find the time \( t \) when the suburban population \( P_s(t) \) is 20% larger than the urban population \( P_u(t) \). The functional equation is:

  • \( \text{Function: } P_s(t) - 1.2 * P_u(t) \)
  • Initial guesses: Ensure the function changes sign between \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \)


The method iteratively applies a formula to update the estimate for \( t \), calculated as follows:
\[ t_{\text{next}} = t_1 - \frac{(P_s(t_1)-1.2*P_u(t_1))(t_2-t_1)}{(P_s(t_2)-1.2*P_u(t_2))-(P_s(t_1)-1.2*P_u(t_1))} \]

Each iteration brings the estimate closer to the actual root, and the process continues until the changes in \( t \) are negligible. The False-Position Method benefits from combining convergence speed with the guaranteed result provided the interval is correct.
Modified Secant Method
The Modified Secant Method is a variation of the classic secant method, tailored for scenarios where derivatives are difficult to compute. It is a derivative-free technique, which makes use of a small perturbation to approximate the derivative and refine the guess iteratively.

The first step is to choose an initial estimation \( t \) and a small perturbation \( \delta \), typically around 0.001. In the context of our exercise, this method helps us find the time \( t \) when the suburb population is 20% larger than the city's. The equation we are interested in solving is still:

  • \(\text{Function: } P_s(t) - 1.2 * P_u(t) \)
  • Initial time estimate and perturbation: Choose \( t \) and \( \delta \).


This is iteratively refined using the update formula:
\[ t_{\text{next}} = t - \frac{(P_s(t)-1.2*P_u(t))\delta t}{(P_s(t+\delta t)-1.2*P_u(t+\delta t))-(P_s(t)-1.2*P_u(t))} \]

Each iteration reduces the estimate's error, continuing until the estimated time difference is within the required tolerance. The Modified Secant Method is less sensitive to initial guesses and typically converges faster than methods requiring derivative calculations.
Population Growth Modeling
Population Growth Modeling deals with predicting how populations change over time, considering various factors. For an engineer, especially in fields like urban planning or transport, understanding population dynamics is crucial for strategic development.

In the exercise explored, two models characterize the dynamic behaviors of urban and suburban populations. These models are often expressions of logistic growth or exponential decay.

  • **Urban Population Equation:** Describes a decline governed by:\[ P_{u}(t) = P_{u, \max} e^{-k_{u} t} + P_{u, \min} \]
  • **Suburban Population Equation:** Characterizes growth as:\[ P_{s}(t) = \frac{P_{s, \max}}{1 + \left[ \frac{P_{s, \max}}{P_{0}} - 1 \right] e^{-k_{s} t} } \]


The key challenge here is to determine the time \( t \) when the suburban population exceeds the urban population by 20%. This involves not just calculating numbers but understanding how population dynamics interact according to empirical parameters like growth rates \( k_u \), \( k_s \), max population sizes, and other initial conditions. Such insights guide policy-making, infrastructure development, and resource allocation, making models like these indispensable in planning.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The phase angle \(\phi\) between the forced vibration caused by the rough road and the motion of the car is given by $$\tan \phi=\frac{2\left(c / c_{c}\right)(\omega / p)}{1-(\omega / p)^{2}}$$ As a mechanical engineer, you would like to know if there are cases where \(\phi=\omega / 3-1 .\) Use the other parameters from the section to set up the equation as a roots problem and solve for \(\omega\).

In chemical engineering, plug flow reactors (that is, those in which fluid flows from one end to the other with minimal mixing along the longitudinal axis) are often used to convert reactants into products. It has been determined that the efficiency of the conversion can sometimes be improved by recycling a portion of the product stream so that it returns to the entrance for an additional pass through the reactor (Fig. \(P 8.2\) ). The recycle rate is defined as \(R=\frac{\text { volume of fluid returned to entrance }}{\text { volume leaving the system }}\) Suppose that we are processing a chemical A to generate a product B. For the case where A forms B according to an autocatalytic reaction (that is, in which one of the products acts as a catalyst or stimulus for the reaction \(),\) it can be shown that an optimal recycle rate must satisfy $$\ln \frac{1+R\left(1-X_{A f}\right)}{R\left(1-X_{A f}\right)}=\frac{R+1}{R\left[1+R\left(1-X_{A f}\right)\right]}$$ where \(X_{A f}=\) the fraction of reactant A that is converted to product B. The optimal recycle rate corresponds to the minimum-sized reactor needed to attain the desired level of conversion. Use a numerical method to determine the recycle ratios needed to minimize reactor size for a fractional conversion of \(X_{A f}=0.96\).

The Manning equation can be written for a rectangular open channel as $$Q=\frac{\sqrt{S}(B H)^{5 / 3}}{n(B+2 H)^{2 / 3}}$$ where \(Q=\) flow \(\left[\mathrm{m}^{3} / \mathrm{s}\right], S=\) slope \([\mathrm{m} / \mathrm{m}], H=\) depth \([\mathrm{m}],\) and \(n=\) the Manning roughness coefficient. Develop a fixed-point iteration scheme to solve this equation for \(H\) given \(Q=5, S=0.0002\) \(B=20,\) and \(n=0.03 .\) Prove that your scheme converges for all initial guesses greater than or equal to zero.

Beyond the Colebrook equation, other relationships, such as the Fanning friction factor \(f,\) are available to estimate friction in pipes. The Fanning friction factor is dependent on a number of parameters related to the size of the pipe and the fluid, which can all be represented by another dimensionless quantity, the Reynolds number Re. A formula that predicts \(f\) given \(\operatorname{Re}\) is the von Karman equation, $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{f}}=4 \log _{10}(\operatorname{Re} \sqrt{f})-0.4$$ Typical values for the Reynolds number for turbulent flow are 10,000 to 500,000 and for the Fanning friction factor are 0.001 to \(0.01 .\) Develop a function that uses bisection to solve for \(f\) given a user-supplied value of Re between 2,500 and \(1,000,000 .\) Design the function so that it ensures that the absolute error in the result is \(E_{a, d}<0.000005\).

Mechanical engineers, as well as most other engineers, use thermodynamics extensively in their work. The following polynomial can be used to relate the zero-pressure specific heat of dry air, \(c_{p} \mathrm{kJ} /(\mathrm{kg} \mathrm{K}),\) to temperature \((\mathrm{K})\): $$\begin{aligned}c_{p}=& 0.99403+1.671 \times 10^{-4} T+9.7215 \times 10^{-8} T^{2} \\\&-9.5838 \times 10^{-11} T^{3}+1.9520 \times 10^{-14} T^{4}\end{aligned}$$ Determine the temperature that corresponds to a specific heat of \(1.2 \mathrm{kJ} /(\mathrm{kg} \mathrm{K})\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.