/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 Solve and graph the solution set... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Solve and graph the solution set on a number line. $$|x-2|<1$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution to the inequality \(|x-2|<1\) is \(1<x<3\). This is represented on a number line by an open circle at 1 and 3, with the region between them shaded.

Step by step solution

01

Get rid of absolute value

First, get rid of the absolute value by splitting the inequality into two separate inequalities. For \(|x-2|<1\), this becomes \(x-2<1\) and \(2-x<1\).
02

Solve each inequality

Next, solve each inequality. For \(x-2<1\), adding 2 to both sides gives \(x<3\). Similarly, for \(2-x<1\), subtracting 2 from both sides gives \(-x<-1\), which simplifies to \(x>1\) when we divide both sides by -1 and flip the inequality sign.
03

Graph the solution on a number line

Finally, graph the solution on a number line. This solution indicates that \(x\) can be any value between 1 and 3, exclusive. So on a number line, we would mark these two points and draw an open circle at both points, then shade the region between them to represent the solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Number Line Graphing
Visualizing mathematical solutions on a number line makes complex problems easier to understand. In this concept, you're translating the solution of an inequality into a visual format. Imagine the number line as a ruler where each point represents a real number.
To graph an inequality like \(|x-2|<1\), you'll start by marking specific points that are important based on your solution. In our problem, these points are 1 and 3. Since these are not included in the solution set, we use open circles.
This indicates that the endpoints are not part of the solution. Between these marks, you'll shade the line to show all possible values \(x\) can take, which are between 1 and 3.
The shaded part represents the range of values that satisfy the inequality. Graphing on a number line is a visual cue that enhances understanding and communication of an algebraic solution.
Solving Inequalities
Solving inequalities involves finding the set of values that make an inequality true. It's similar to solving equations, but requires more attention to detail due to the inequality signs.
In our exercise, \(|x-2|<1\), we start by transforming the absolute value inequality into two separate inequalities: \(x-2<1\) and \(2-x<1\).
This allows us to work with simpler linear inequalities. The main trick is remembering that if you multiply or divide an inequality by a negative number, you must flip the inequality sign.
Let's solve \(x-2<1\). Adding 2 to both sides gives \(x<3\). For \(2-x<1\), subtract 2, yielding \(-x<-1\). Dividing by -1, and flipping the sign, we get \(x>1\).
Now you've got a solution that tells you the possible values for \(x\). It's important to check your solution to ensure it satisfies the original inequality.
Algebraic Expressions
Understanding algebraic expressions lays the foundation for solving inequalities and equations alike.
Algebraic expressions involve numbers, variables, and operations. In our exercise, the expression \(|x-2|\) indicates the distance between \(x\) and 2 on a number line.
This distance must be smaller than 1, according to \(|x-2| < 1\). When dealing with absolute values, we often split the expression into two cases, as was done earlier with inequalities.
By correctly manipulating these algebraic expressions, you can transform an inequality into something that's manageable.
The goal is always to isolate the variable, which allows us to identify all possible values that satisfy the given condition. Understanding how to navigate and simplify these expressions is key in solving more complex mathematical problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine whether each statement is true or false. If the statement is false, make the necessary change(s) to produce a true statement. The equation \(|x|=-6\) is equivalent to \(x=6\) or \(x=-6\)

Determine whether each statement "makes sense" or "does not make sense" and explain your reasoning. I'm considering the compound inequality \(x<8\) or \(x \geq 8\) so the solution set is \((-\infty, \infty)\)

Without graphing, in Exercises \(55-58,\) determine if each system has no solution or infinitely many solutions. $$\left\\{\begin{array}{l} 3 x+y<9 \\ 3 x+y>9 \end{array}\right.$$

In more U.S. marriages, spouses have different faiths. The bar graph shows the percentage of households with an interfaith marriage in 1988 and \(2008 .\) Also shown is the percentage of households in which a person of faith is married to someone with no religion. (GRAPH CANT COPY) The formula $$1-\frac{1}{2} x+2=$$ models the percentage of U.S. households with an interfaith marriage, \(I, x\) years after \(1988 .\) The formula $$N=\frac{1}{4} x+6$$ models the percentage of U.S. households in which a person of faith is married to someone with no religion, \(N, x\) years after I988. Use these models to solve. a. In which years will more than \(33 \%\) of U.S. households have an interfaith marriage? b. In which years will more than \(14 \%\) of U.S. households have a person of faith married to someone with no religion? c. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b), in which years will more than \(33 \%\) of households have an interfaith marriage and more than \(14 \%\) have a faith/no religion marriage? d. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b), in which years will more than \(33 \%\) of households have an interfaith marriage or more than \(14 \%\) have a faith/no religion marriage?

Write each sentence as a linear inequality in two variables. Then graph the inequality. The \(y\) -variable is at least 2 more than the product of \(-3\) and the \(x\) -variable.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.