/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Give a counterexample to show th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 15

Give a counterexample to show that the following construction fails to prove Theorem \(1.49\), the closure of the class of regular languages under the star operation. \({ }^{7}\) Let \(N_{1}=\left(Q_{1}, \Sigma, \delta_{1}, q_{1}, F_{1}\right)\) recognize \(A_{1}\). Construct \(N=\left(Q_{1}, \Sigma, \delta, q_{1}, F\right)\) as follows. \(N\) is supposed to recognize \(A_{1}^{*}\). a. The states of \(N\) are the states of \(N_{1}\). b. The start state of \(N\) is the same as the start state of \(N_{1}\). c. \(F=\left\\{q_{1}\right\\} \cup F_{1}\). The accept states \(F\) are the old accept states plus its start state. d. Define \(\delta\) so that for any \(q \in Q_{1}\) and any \(a \in \Sigma_{\varepsilon}\), $$ \delta(q, a)= \begin{cases}\delta_{1}(q, a) & q \notin F_{1} \text { or } a \neq \varepsilon \\ \delta_{1}(q, a) \cup\left\\{q_{1}\right\\} & q \in F_{1} \text { and } a=\varepsilon\end{cases} $$ (Suggestion: Show this construction graphically, as in Figure \(1.50\).)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Let's consider the language A鈧 = {蔚, a}, which is recognized by the NFA N鈧 with Q鈧 = {q鈧, q鈧倉, 危 = {a, 蔚}, F鈧 = {q鈧倉, and 未鈧 defined with 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = {q鈧倉, 未鈧(q鈧, a) = {q鈧倉, 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = 鈭, 未鈧(q鈧, a) = 鈭. By following the given construction, we obtain NFA N with states {q鈧, q鈧倉, start state q鈧, accept states F = {q鈧, q鈧倉, and 未 as: 未(q鈧, 蔚) = {q鈧, q鈧倉, 未(q鈧, a) = 未鈧(q鈧, a) = {q鈧倉, 未(q鈧, 蔚) = 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = 鈭, 未(q鈧, a) = 未鈧(q鈧, a) = 鈭. However, the string 'aa', which should be in A鈧*, is not recognized by N, as it goes from state q鈧 to state q鈧, but doesn't return back to the start state q鈧 to process the second 'a' character. This counterexample shows that the given construction does not prove Theorem 1.49 correctly, as it fails to recognize A鈧* in this case.

Step by step solution

01

Counterexample and Explanation

Let's consider the language A鈧 = {蔚, a}, which is recognized by the NFA N鈧 = (Q鈧, 危, 未鈧, q鈧, F鈧), where: Q鈧 = {q鈧, q鈧倉; 危 = {a, 蔚}; F鈧 = {q鈧倉; 未鈧 is defined as: 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = {q鈧倉, 未鈧(q鈧, a) = {q鈧倉, 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = 鈭, 未鈧(q鈧, a) = 鈭. Now, we construct NFA N following the suggested construction as follows: a. The states of N are the states of N鈧: Q鈧 = {q鈧, q鈧倉. b. The start state of N is the same as the start state of N鈧: q鈧. c. The accept states of N are the old accept states plus its start state: F = {q鈧, q鈧倉. d. For the transition function, we need to apply the provided rule for 未, and obtain: 未(q鈧, 蔚) = 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) 鈭 {q鈧亇 = {q鈧, q鈧倉, 未(q鈧, a) = 未鈧(q鈧, a) = {q鈧倉, 未(q鈧, 蔚) = 未鈧(q鈧, 蔚) = 鈭, 未(q鈧, a) = 未鈧(q鈧, a) = 鈭. Now, let's check if N recognizes A鈧*: - 蔚 is in A鈧*, and it is recognized by N, as the starting state q鈧 is in the accept state set F. - 'a' is also in A鈧*, and it is also recognized by N, as 未(q鈧, a) = {q鈧倉 and q鈧 is in F. However, consider the string 'aa', which should also be in A鈧*. When we use N to evaluate 'aa', the following sequence of states will occur: {q鈧亇 鈫 {q鈧倉 鈫 鈭. It leads to an empty set of states meaning 'aa' is not recognized by N. Thus, the given construction fails to recognize A鈧* in this case, which serves as a counterexample proving that the construction is not correct. Note: The construction fails because it does not take into account transitions that need to go back to the start state q鈧 when a word in the language A鈧* is evaluated. A correct construction would require additional transitions to handle such cases correctly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regular Languages
Regular languages are a fundamental class of languages in theoretical computer science and formal language theory. They are known for their simplicity and are defined by their acceptability by deterministic finite automata (DFA) or non-deterministic finite automata (NFA). These languages can be described using regular expressions and are closed under various operations, including union, intersection, and difference.

When you work with regular languages, you are dealing with sets of strings that have predictable and fixed patterns. For example, a language that accepts all strings over the alphabet \( \{0, 1\} \) that contain an even number of zeros is a regular language. Regular languages are recognized by automata that have a finite number of states and thus possess limited memory. The concept of regular languages is significant because they are computationally tractable and can be easily implemented in software for various applications like text processing and syntax highlighting.
Star Operation
The star operation, also known as the Kleene star, is an essential operation in the field of formal languages. It applies to a language and forms what is called the Kleene closure, which represents the idea of taking any number of repetitions, including zero, of the strings that are in the language. Mathematically, if you have a language \( L \), then its Kleene closure, denoted by \( L^* \), is defined as the set containing all strings that can be made by concatenating zero or more strings from \( L \), including the empty string \( \varepsilon \).

For example, if \( L = \{a, ab\} \) then \( L^* \) would include \( \varepsilon \), \( a \), \( ab \), \( aab \), \( aba \), \( abab \), and so on, ad infinitum. It is a powerful operation allowing for the expression of infinite sets of strings and is a central concept in understanding the generative capacity of regular languages.
Non-Deterministic Finite Automaton (NFA)
A non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) is a type of finite state machine that is used to recognize regular languages. Unlike deterministic finite automata (DFA), an NFA can have multiple transitions for the same input from a given state, including transitions that do not consume any input symbols (epsilon transitions).

An NFA is defined by a set of states, an alphabet of symbols, a transition function, an initial state, and a set of accept states. Importantly, despite its non-determinism, an NFA is not more powerful than a DFA in terms of the languages it can recognize 鈥 every NFA can be converted into an equivalent DFA, though potentially with an exponential increase in the number of states. The appeal of using NFAs lies in their simpler and more compact representation for certain languages. In practice, NFAs are valuable in the design of compilers and text processing tools because of their expressive power and easier construction.
Counterexample
In mathematics and computer science, a counterexample is an instance that disproves a proposition or a theorem. In the context of formal languages and automata theory, a counterexample can be used to show that a certain construction or method for recognizing or generating a language fails.

Counterexamples are critical because they help in understanding the limitations of an approach and can lead to more robust and correct algorithms or theorems. For instance, if someone proposed a construction method for an automaton to recognize a particular operation on regular languages, a counterexample would consist of a specific regular language for which that construction does not yield an automaton that correctly recognizes the language as intended. This method of proof by contradiction is a powerful tool that guides researchers towards accurate characterizations of computational models and their capabilities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. Let \(B=\left\\{1^{k} y \mid y \in\\{0,1\\}^{*}\right.\) and \(y\) contains at least \(k 1\) s, for \(\left.k \geq 1\right\\} .\) Show that \(B\) is a regular language. b. Let \(C=\left\\{1^{k} y \mid y \in\\{0,1\\}^{*}\right.\) and \(y\) contains at most \(k\) is, for \(\left.k \geq 1\right\\}\). Show that \(C\) isn't a regular language.

Let \(\Sigma=\\{0,1\\}\) and let \(D=\\{w \mid w\) contains an equal number of occurrences of the substrings 01 and 10\(\\} .\) Thus \(101 \in D\) because 101 contains a single 01 and a single 10 , but \(1010 \notin D\) because 1010 contains two 10 s and one 01 . Show that \(D\) is a regular language.

65 Prove that for each \(n>0\), a language \(B_{n}\) exists where a. \(B_{n}\) is recognizable by an NFA that has \(n\) states, and b. if \(B_{n}=A_{1} \cup \cdots \cup A_{k}\), for regular languages \(A_{i}\), then at least one of the \(A_{i}\) requires a DFA with exponentially many states. 66 A bomomorphism is a function \(f: \Sigma \longrightarrow \Gamma^{*}\) from one alphabet to strings over another alphabet. We can extend \(f\) to operate on strings by defining \(f(w)=\) \(f\left(w_{1}\right) f\left(w_{2}\right) \cdots f\left(w_{n}\right)\), where \(w=w_{1} w_{2} \cdots w_{n}\) and each \(w_{i} \in \Sigma .\) We further extend \(f\) to operate on languages by defining \(f(A)=\\{f(w) \mid w \in A\\}\), for any language \(A\). a. Show, by giving a formal construction, that the class of regular languages is closed under homomorphism. In other words, given a DFA \(M\) that recognizes \(B\) and a homomorphism \(f\), construct a finite automaton \(M^{\prime}\) that recognizes \(f(B)\). Consider the machine \(M^{\prime}\) that you constructed. Is it a DFA in every case? b. Show, by giving an example, that the class of non-regular languages is not closed under homomorphism.

Give state diagrams of DFAs recognizing the following languages. In all parts, the alphabet is \(\\{0,1\\}\). a. \(\\{w \mid w\) begins with a 1 and ends with a 0\(\\}\) b. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains at least three 1 s \(\\}\) c. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains the substring 0101 (i.e., \(w=x 0101 y\) for some \(x\) and \(y\) ) \(\\}\) d. \(\\{w \mid w\) has length at least 3 and its third symbol is a 0\(\\}\) e. \(\\{w \mid w\) starts with 0 and has odd length, or starts with 1 and has even length \(\\}\) f. \(\\{w \mid w\) doesn't contain the substring 110 g. \(\\{w \mid\) the length of \(w\) is at most 5\(\\}\) h. \(\\{w \mid w\) is any string except 11 and 111\(\\}\) i. \(\\{w \mid\) every odd position of \(w\) is a 1 \(\\}\) j. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains at least two os and at most one 1\(\\}\) k. \(\\{\varepsilon, 0\\}\) 1\. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains an even number of os, or contains exactly two 1s \(\\}\) m. The empty set n. All strings except the empty string

Let the rotational closure of language \(A\) be \(R C(A)=\\{y x \mid x y \in A\\} .\) a. Show that for any language \(A\), we have \(R C(A)=R C(R C(A))\). b. Show that the class of regular languages is closed under rotational closure.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.